These faggots deserve what they promote, you wanted a liberal society that imports other cultures. Well guess what, it was white westerners who rescued the relics being used as toys and trash in Egypt, same in Africa, all we got for saving the heritages of the world was scorn and cries of colonialism. Now you are mad that the cultures you imported still don’t give a fuck.
I get why some people freak out about "stealing" artifacts, but they were literally sitting there by cultures that were intentionally destroying them and so they got rescued and preserved for.... well let's just say virtually all time thanks to this. Maybe there were some mishaps along the way, but seriously "colonialism" is actually one of the best things that ever happened to archaeology and to preserve cultures throughout the world xD even if it wasn't intended to be.
Anyone who knows even basic terrestrial mythology knows the origin of the mummy's curse:
The origin is disease. Obviously. Specifically, Egyptian people were using mummy wrappings to wrap food. They were breaking apart ancient tombs and shrines and pyramids, going "oh, corpse, well, smashy smashy fun times, hey look, wrapping paper!" and putting it on their lunches. Then getting sick. And going "clearly, mummy tomb is cursed".
Meanwhile, the British went "you're smashing these things for fun, destroying them... And using them in foodstuffs? Okay... no. All that shit is coming with us back to England."
Flash forward several centuries, and you get "Waah, waah, our heritage! You stole it!"
I guess they wanted to use the stone sarcophagi and grind them down to gravel for their roads or something, and were short on rocks, so had to yell at the brits. They probably would have, not like they historically didn't pull that shit before. Even now just a country or two over, they're STILL grinding historical statues into rubble.
Is that REALLY what was happening, damn. I give a lot of shit to the 600-1400's Europeans that dismantled Roman roads and structures to build houses, but at least using well cut marble to build a slightly better house isn't as bad as eating the rotting skin droppings from some dead dudes.
We should not wish for the destruction of historical artifacts simply out of spite for those who have terrible judgement. This is an unhealthy mindset to dwell in.
And if they ever call you on your BS just say it was modern art/performance art about how much the white man is stealing the wakanda culture of the black man. You will be rich.
"It was a social experiment to start conversations."
https://archive.ph/TjZIz
https:// www. nytimes. com/2021/06/06/nyregion/yale-psychiatrist-aruna-khilanani. html
A Psychiatrist Invited to Yale Spoke of Fantasies of Shooting White People
The Yale School of Medicine said the tone and content of a lecture by Dr. Aruna Khilanani, who has a private practice in New York, were “antithetical to the values of the school.”
Yale University has restricted access to an online video of a talk given by Dr. Aruna Khilanani, in which she said that talking directly to white people about race was a “waste of our breath.” Credit...Christopher Capozziello for The New York Times
By Michael Levenson
June 6, 2021, 11:16 a.m. ET
She added: “My speaking metaphorically about my own anger was a method for people to reflect on negative feelings. To normalize negative feelings. Because if you don’t, it will turn into a violent action.”
Dr. Khilanani noted that her lecture had initially been well received. After she gave it, several attendees praised her comments on the online feed.
One woman who identified herself as a Yale psychologist called it “absolutely brilliant.” A man said, “I feel very shook in a good way,” and a Black woman thanked Dr. Khilanani for giving “voice to us as people of color and what we go through all the time.”
Dr. Khilanani posted several videos on TikTok addressing what she called Yale’s “suppression of my talk on race.” In her email, she called on Yale to release the video, and she said in a phone interview that Yale should not have been surprised because “they knew the topic, they knew the title, they knew the speaker.”
"London was a lot more black than literally every painting, every drawing, every first hand account for hundreds of years" - Doctor Who, 2019, trying to explain why they flooded the set with black extras to meet quota.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - Eric Blair, aka George Orwell. 1984.
One of the great tragedies is that people don't understand just how deep the concepts in 1984 go. It's not just "censorship bad", but there's a ton of discussion of the underlaying principals. Daily hates to keep people focused on one random enemy at a time, torture to get people to reject their own reality for what is fed to them, in Fahrenheit 451 it wasn't illegal for books to exist but people would gleefully run and dump their own and their neighbor's books out on the lawn for people to blaze em up, and they surrounded themselves with wall to wall tv's to blare out any thought.
Cambridge University backs academic who tweeted 'White Lives Don't Matter' - and PROMOTES her to professor - after she received barrage of abuse and death threats
Dr Priyamvada Gopal was hit by a wave of abusive messages and death threats
The academic tweeted: 'I'll say it again. White Lives Don't Matter. As white lives.'
Cambridge University defended rights of academic to express lawful opinions
By BHVISHYA PATEL FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 12:04 EDT, 25 June 2020 | UPDATED: 05:43 EDT, 26 June 2020
Thing is there is more than one Britain. I hate yours, racist Empire-shagger. I am very contented to engage with the Britain of the Diggers & the Levellers, the Chartists & the International Brigades. Of Robert Wedderburn & Elizabeth Heyrick. Not heard of them? Oh dear.
But I hope it answers the question: 'Why don't you leave then?'. Yours politely, PG
You know, it's true that my identity has taken me far. But it's not my identity as a woman of colour in Britain; it's my manifold advantages as an Indian upper-caste who, like white men, also like to bang on about 'merit.' The real identity politics is the one that goes unnamed
This. This is why I am far more afraid of white women than men. Terrorised, actually. The pious victimhood, the relentless refusal to assess one's own position. I say this as someone who has learned very late in life to assess her own upper-caste advantage and willed ignorance.
Countdown to righteous tears. Or has that already happened?
One of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen is that there should be no museums and just leave the stuff where it's found. Like yeah, I'm sure that these tribes are funding and training people to carefully excavate and preserve their discarded shit.
Fuck'em. These are the some of the wokest of the woke. They aren't doing archeology so much as rewriting history and denying actual science for their witchdoctor voodoo shit.
That which is represents the accumulation of that which was. What are the implications for that which will be; if ignoring that which is for that which was?
I genuinely can't tell if this is a shitty bot or some neckbeard with a keyboard who has been huffing his own farts for so long he has brain damage from hypoxia
That implies a good bot; which would represent the conflict of reason (good vs bad aka true vs false); which means this represents a suggested belief (bad) in exchange for ignorance towards free will of choice; needed for constant evaluation to sustain balance (hence choice) as form within flow.
What does " -> " represent? Motion aka flow aka implication (if/then). Take a finger and jab it gently in your face. What you will feel represents form within flow aka momentum within motion.
We perceive because flow communicates to form; we can act because form represents a response to flow, we have a choice of action (free will) because temporary momentum within ongoing motion implies balance, and balance within motion implies the need for choice of action for form within flow...adaptation.
the middle ground
A to Z equals beginning (inception) towards end (death); which makes the sustenance of life (form within flow) a choice based responsibility; a balance act; ONEs (form) middle ground of temporary opportunity (potential) within the ongoing ALL (flow) aka potentiality.
to fill in
Flow represents ALL (potentiality); form represents the segregation of collective potentially into individual ONE potential. ONE perceives ALL; has a choice (free will) to adhere or ignore ALL, and the result of that choice builds ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived aka ONEs potential within ALL offered potentiality.
Filling in represents adaption to inspiration (from ALL), which through free will of choice, will be transmuted into comprehended information (within ONE). Flow moves form; form perceives the movement of other form; which represents the inspiration communicated from flow to form.
We are dealing with a parasite (form) that suggests us to ignore adherence to flow by consenting through free will of choice to "believe" in the suggestion of other form. If we ignore to adapt to inspiration; while believing suggested information; then we self restrict the transmutation from inspiration (flow) into information (form) aka our potential aka our responsibility to sustain ONEself (form) within ALL (flow).
You are; so everything that was lead towards you to be. What if others suggest you to ignore the sustenance of that which is (you); for contemplation about that which was (not you)? In other words...suggestion as distraction to waste potential. Sounds like a beneficial racket for the few who want to control the many; doesn't it?
As form within flow; the pull of flow upon form, represents the temptation to ignore adherence to self sustenance. This is why you're tempted to choose wants over needs.
wank to porn
Suggested lust (porn) in exchange for consent to self sacrifice of life (masturbation)...a soft genocide by suggestion and highly effective at that. Btw; not only is pornography being suggested as a culling tool for the masses; but also onanism (masturbation) aka self defilement.
These faggots deserve what they promote, you wanted a liberal society that imports other cultures. Well guess what, it was white westerners who rescued the relics being used as toys and trash in Egypt, same in Africa, all we got for saving the heritages of the world was scorn and cries of colonialism. Now you are mad that the cultures you imported still don’t give a fuck.
I get why some people freak out about "stealing" artifacts, but they were literally sitting there by cultures that were intentionally destroying them and so they got rescued and preserved for.... well let's just say virtually all time thanks to this. Maybe there were some mishaps along the way, but seriously "colonialism" is actually one of the best things that ever happened to archaeology and to preserve cultures throughout the world xD even if it wasn't intended to be.
African Americans wouldn't know the shape of the continent that they wear on their t shirts if it wasn't for colonization.
colonialism was objectively good.
Anyone who knows even basic terrestrial mythology knows the origin of the mummy's curse:
The origin is disease. Obviously. Specifically, Egyptian people were using mummy wrappings to wrap food. They were breaking apart ancient tombs and shrines and pyramids, going "oh, corpse, well, smashy smashy fun times, hey look, wrapping paper!" and putting it on their lunches. Then getting sick. And going "clearly, mummy tomb is cursed".
Meanwhile, the British went "you're smashing these things for fun, destroying them... And using them in foodstuffs? Okay... no. All that shit is coming with us back to England."
Flash forward several centuries, and you get "Waah, waah, our heritage! You stole it!"
I guess they wanted to use the stone sarcophagi and grind them down to gravel for their roads or something, and were short on rocks, so had to yell at the brits. They probably would have, not like they historically didn't pull that shit before. Even now just a country or two over, they're STILL grinding historical statues into rubble.
Is that REALLY what was happening, damn. I give a lot of shit to the 600-1400's Europeans that dismantled Roman roads and structures to build houses, but at least using well cut marble to build a slightly better house isn't as bad as eating the rotting skin droppings from some dead dudes.
This. Hopefully the savages destroy all these shitty museums across Europe
We should not wish for the destruction of historical artifacts simply out of spite for those who have terrible judgement. This is an unhealthy mindset to dwell in.
Your account is new and this is the only post you have made.
Just "find" some Wakanda artifacts made from craft glue and foamboard then.
Lots of Soros and Rockefeller grant money from shitty corpos desperately trying to not look racist.
And if they ever call you on your BS just say it was modern art/performance art about how much the white man is stealing the wakanda culture of the black man. You will be rich.
"It was a social experiment to start conversations."
https://archive.ph/TjZIz https:// www. nytimes. com/2021/06/06/nyregion/yale-psychiatrist-aruna-khilanani. html
Cutting a population's ties to their past and their progenitors makes them easier to control.
Probably didn't "find" enough black people in ancient England, so now they have to go.
"London was a lot more black than literally every painting, every drawing, every first hand account for hundreds of years" - Doctor Who, 2019, trying to explain why they flooded the set with black extras to meet quota.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - Eric Blair, aka George Orwell. 1984.
One of the great tragedies is that people don't understand just how deep the concepts in 1984 go. It's not just "censorship bad", but there's a ton of discussion of the underlaying principals. Daily hates to keep people focused on one random enemy at a time, torture to get people to reject their own reality for what is fed to them, in Fahrenheit 451 it wasn't illegal for books to exist but people would gleefully run and dump their own and their neighbor's books out on the lawn for people to blaze em up, and they surrounded themselves with wall to wall tv's to blare out any thought.
That's a big part of it: we will make you into a willing participant in your own indoctrination (and of course in the indoctrination of others).
But of course that could never happen here.
Just a minute... I'm being handed a note...
Principles.
https://archive.ph/eEWK8 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8460059/Cambridge-University-backs-academic-tweeted-White-Lives-Dont-Matter.html
"Professor of Postcolonial Studies in the Faculty of English at the University of Cambridge"
https://archive.ph/Y3pxi
https://archive.ph/Blqpn
https://archive.ph/3oznz
She didn't receive it, she did it to herself. That's how these cunts work.
They're also dropping history and anthropology everywhere.
One of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen is that there should be no museums and just leave the stuff where it's found. Like yeah, I'm sure that these tribes are funding and training people to carefully excavate and preserve their discarded shit.
Fuck'em. These are the some of the wokest of the woke. They aren't doing archeology so much as rewriting history and denying actual science for their witchdoctor voodoo shit.
Aracheology is racist.
That which is represents the accumulation of that which was. What are the implications for that which will be; if ignoring that which is for that which was?
Bad bot.
I genuinely can't tell if this is a shitty bot or some neckbeard with a keyboard who has been huffing his own farts for so long he has brain damage from hypoxia
That implies a good bot; which would represent the conflict of reason (good vs bad aka true vs false); which means this represents a suggested belief (bad) in exchange for ignorance towards free will of choice; needed for constant evaluation to sustain balance (hence choice) as form within flow.
Bad bot.
If form within flow aka life moving from inception towards death, then what are the implications of "driving forwards"?
Bad bot.
You're asserting A -> B; E -> F. Care to fill in the middle ground a little?
What does " -> " represent? Motion aka flow aka implication (if/then). Take a finger and jab it gently in your face. What you will feel represents form within flow aka momentum within motion.
We perceive because flow communicates to form; we can act because form represents a response to flow, we have a choice of action (free will) because temporary momentum within ongoing motion implies balance, and balance within motion implies the need for choice of action for form within flow...adaptation.
A to Z equals beginning (inception) towards end (death); which makes the sustenance of life (form within flow) a choice based responsibility; a balance act; ONEs (form) middle ground of temporary opportunity (potential) within the ongoing ALL (flow) aka potentiality.
Flow represents ALL (potentiality); form represents the segregation of collective potentially into individual ONE potential. ONE perceives ALL; has a choice (free will) to adhere or ignore ALL, and the result of that choice builds ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived aka ONEs potential within ALL offered potentiality.
Filling in represents adaption to inspiration (from ALL), which through free will of choice, will be transmuted into comprehended information (within ONE). Flow moves form; form perceives the movement of other form; which represents the inspiration communicated from flow to form.
We are dealing with a parasite (form) that suggests us to ignore adherence to flow by consenting through free will of choice to "believe" in the suggestion of other form. If we ignore to adapt to inspiration; while believing suggested information; then we self restrict the transmutation from inspiration (flow) into information (form) aka our potential aka our responsibility to sustain ONEself (form) within ALL (flow).
2 deep 4 me
You are; so everything that was lead towards you to be. What if others suggest you to ignore the sustenance of that which is (you); for contemplation about that which was (not you)? In other words...suggestion as distraction to waste potential. Sounds like a beneficial racket for the few who want to control the many; doesn't it?
As form within flow; the pull of flow upon form, represents the temptation to ignore adherence to self sustenance. This is why you're tempted to choose wants over needs.
Suggested lust (porn) in exchange for consent to self sacrifice of life (masturbation)...a soft genocide by suggestion and highly effective at that. Btw; not only is pornography being suggested as a culling tool for the masses; but also onanism (masturbation) aka self defilement.
Bad bot.
Did you knew that bad(ro)bot is a j.j. abrams operation with a weinstein as president?