Most people don’t understand that ‘diversity’ is a product of pandering to women, there isn’t a larger market for oligarchy/communism than women. These troglodytes that buy into advertising are the same nimbys that look shocked when they get called Karens.
This is also why I think men need to step up first. Women are going to keep looking to create families & patriarchs were there shouldn't be any, and men are the only solution to that problem.
They are excessively over represented in advertising. I remember even Drew Magary talked about how off putting it was to hear the blatant, fetishistic pandering that went on in ad rooms when discussing casting of commercials. I'm fine with "diversity" but when you constantly hear about how we "need" more representation of PoC in various fields its funny how that only goes one way. Oddly enough, another group that is massively over represented is gingers.
I should have clarified. I guess what I meant is there are around 44 million black people in the US so I would understand seeing them in advertisements occasionally. But when it comes to reality and the current definition of diversity, I trust science and science has shown that diversity is a net negative on society (and not just for evil whites.)
Yeah, they consciously made the decision to show no whites in their media a few years back. About the same time their products started slowly going to shit.
Most people don’t understand that ‘diversity’ is a product of pandering to women, there isn’t a larger market for oligarchy/communism than women. These troglodytes that buy into advertising are the same nimbys that look shocked when they get called Karens.
Hilariously, white women in particular.
This is also why I think men need to step up first. Women are going to keep looking to create families & patriarchs were there shouldn't be any, and men are the only solution to that problem.
They're definitely not Uighurs
also: https://archive.vn/hMyUm https://notthebee.com/article/i-guess-apple-didnt-pander-hard-enough-because-heres-one-of-their-stores-burning-to-the-ground-in-portland
Isn't it common in American advertising that almost everyone is black?
I see it more and more here as well, even though almost no one is black.
They are excessively over represented in advertising. I remember even Drew Magary talked about how off putting it was to hear the blatant, fetishistic pandering that went on in ad rooms when discussing casting of commercials. I'm fine with "diversity" but when you constantly hear about how we "need" more representation of PoC in various fields its funny how that only goes one way. Oddly enough, another group that is massively over represented is gingers.
Why are you still "fine" with diversity if you know it's a lie?
I should have clarified. I guess what I meant is there are around 44 million black people in the US so I would understand seeing them in advertisements occasionally. But when it comes to reality and the current definition of diversity, I trust science and science has shown that diversity is a net negative on society (and not just for evil whites.)
Yeah, they consciously made the decision to show no whites in their media a few years back. About the same time their products started slowly going to shit.
Must be a coincidence.
Surprisingly it actually wasn't anywhere near as severe as the last event or two, although still noticeable.
Every commercial I see for any product or whatever is all black people and rarely do I see a white dude
I actually think this is fine. The miscegenation stuff is far worse of a message to send.
You're projecting your own neurotic issues with women onto others again.
I agree with you 90% of the time, but this ain't it man
You are a nothing scumbag
Are those really the only two options in your mind?