Out of curiousity, I googled the latest Captain America news. Appareantly, the new Captain actor in the Disney+ series is getting death threats because of Chris Evan whores. Toxic femininity?
Jordan Peterson is controlled-opposition: another academic motormouth with a giant load of skeletons in his closet, and he's been chosen for you to represent you (because who wouldn't want a brain-fried drug-addict as their go-to philosopher?). The "tell" is that they're who the commies are always bitching about full-time, and you're always hearing about said bitching in the useless, tag-team kayfabe conservapundit alt-press. Avoid these SOBs like the plague. Never promote them. Never link them.
What makes you say he is controlled opposition? Despite going to church hundreds of times, he's the only one who got me to read the Bible with open eyes and ears. How is that a bad thing, exactly?
This is what the massively-downvoted poster above was getting at. (You see this phenomena everywhere around you once it "clicks". Politics, entertainment, religion, sports. You're strung along following electroplated heroes promoted into your attention-span who will then implode on cue when needed.)
Freshman congresscritters are an easy example of this phenomenon. The phony right can't stop incessantly yammering about AOC, and the phony left can't stop incessantly yammering about MTG, both of whom a basically mirror images of each other as powerless, low-level squawking parrots reeling off manicured talking-points like kayfabe wrestlers massaging their allotted mic time.
It's comic-book fight choreography, and they're treating you like eight year-olds.
""Juden Peterstein" has been a meme for quite some time now."
Is it? First I've heard of it.
My criticism of him comes from an entirely different angle.
(And as far as I am concerned, all neo-Nazi-esque groups are controlled fronts. The Deep State / Cabal doesn't care about communism, national-socialism, Fabianism, Jews, or whites; everyone is recruitable, everyone is expendable. For them, it's all a big game of 'let's you and him fight' while I sell both of you morons lots of weapons, making sure I have plenty of controlling video of everyone committing all sorts of crimes, and use your antics for explanations of what happened to the stock-market when the tape was painted the way I wanted.)
I've only heard of it because about a 1 year ago, someone showed up on /r/KiA2 who started calling him that. He happened to be a total psycho, as one would expect from someone posting such things.
It's not as if it's incredible common, because for that one guy, there were 100 other Stormfags posting nonsense like 'early life' and 'NOTICING'.
My criticism of him comes from an entirely different angle.
Same, I find the Jungian stuff to be totally unpersuasive to say the least. Everything that isn't that, I rather like.
You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.
The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.
So:
he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites
he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims
he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races
he cannot talk about in group preference
he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual
he cannot talk about immigration
But:
he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)
he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.
he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happiness comes from individualism.
Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.
It's a slight of hand magic trick in 100 000 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.
The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.
You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.
Of course, individualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is inseparable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.
So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.
But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.
You can use this is the technique to evaluate everyone, even here on win forums. It's a great tool.
I think I tend to lean on the individualists side, as I don't feel that the offspring is responsible for the sins of their fathers. I also don't think they are responsible for the successes of their fathers. I would just disagree with him on having pride in your people/country. I just don't view him in my mind as a politics character and I suppose the answer is "bro you're on KIA2 of course we look at things politically first and foremost", but, he's not very interesting to me politically. I like him for his religious stuff or profesionally for self authoring, and it's just so strange watching people get so heated around the topic of him.
Overall I at least see where you're coming from groups vs individuals. I just suppose I do lay more on his side of things. I was raised LDS and they have an article of faith that I didn't understand as a child that I think is the demarcation line that makes sense to me on that topic.
“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression”
Especially as someone who has sinned plenty during his lifetime, I have enough reasons that I myself can damn myself over, I don't need the guilt of every sin that my fore-fathers committed laid at my feet, and while I am literally in awe and have a deep reverence for what my fore-fathers did and for which I will always be thankful for, my honest conviction about what sort of responsibility or relationship we have with the past was what woke me up from being a lefist a long time ago. I wasn't about to repent for something I didn't do as I was already rather busy trying to make amends for my actions. The past is a source of pride and inspiration, but I don't feel any ownership over their actions, only that I should emulate the best of them.
That's the trick. The trick is to get you to think it is more one vs the other and that you have a choice. This isn't so at all. Individualism vs ingroup are there and present all the time with every action and every inaction you ever take.
You CANNOT take an action that either DOESN'T require the group or DOESN'T affect the group. It is utterly IMPOSSIBLE for the individual to exist, act and survive without the group.
Every action you take REQUIRES resources acquired and provisioned to you by the group. Simultaneously, every action you take either ADDS or TAKES away from the net / net resources of the group.
Lastly, your BIRTH / EXISTENCE is EXPLICITLY an expression of the ingroups existence and success.
As well, once a persons starts to see the magic trick these charlatans are pulling, a kind of synthesis happens:
All of a sudden you can, simultaneously, see your purpose as an individual and purpose as a member of an in group.
All of a sudden you understand why you need to pick up the heaviest thing you can find and carry it and why it's important to clean your room bucko.
All of a sudden you have clarity beyond the horizon imposed on you by charlatans, you have access to the full database instead of a tiny column of data over there in the corner that these people need you to be slaves to.
All of a sudden all of our myths and history have meaning and every black and white photo comes to life and every 40 000 year old etching on a cave in France has deep deep spiritual and transitive quality.
All of a sudden you understand why you exist and you understand the maximum potential meaning of your life will have accumulated at your death bed.
All of a sudden death, life and the present have new meaning.
There are reasons they want us to forget the past and become atomized. This isn't by accident.
I mean I agree, the only thing is that the only groups that have static boundaries are families. Nations, Races, and Religions are always drifting and changing, sometimes quickly, usually slowly, but still.
If you are the glorious expression of your peoples survival for 500 000 years or more in conditions so harsh you cannot fathom it (ever consider going out into the woods naked with no camping gear, no tools and try to survive for week?), just how much reverence do you have for the continuation of your lineage?
THIS is the goal of the magic trick. A magic trick has two components: HIDE INFORMATION (don't tell them the whole truth) and REDIRECT THEIR FOCUS to an area that is beneficial to you. All magic tricks are exactly this slight of hand.
The moment you start to see ALL OF THE INFORMATION and the moment you start to FOCUS ON YOUR SURVIVAL is the moment you are focused on the survival of your people.
The only question here is, DO YOU control your access to information and your focus or does your enemy.
Huge JP fan here (though I haven't listened to him much lately - the IDW has become as a whole very cringeworthy to me now). I have never seen this before.
In his defense, publicly speaking about the JQ is risky, especially for such a large public figure. Even if he answered thoughtfully and in good faith, it would be taken out of context and him and his family would recieve 1000x more hell than they've already received. Would you talk about the JQ if you were JBP? I am not sure if I would.
I'd probably be more willing to say "I can't honestly answer that without risking my loved ones" instead of just sidestepping it entirely when it's central to 90% of what he talks about. He constantly brings up the last century, but it's always the Nahzeeees, and virtually never the communists.
Ah, that fills out the picture. I really hope 200 Years Together gets fully translated one day. I'm on Vol 2 out of 3 of The Gulag Archipelago and I'm certainly interested in what else he had to say, even if he wrote it far after the events had transpired.
We should have known when YouTube was pushing him to the front page. He has some killer moments in interviews but in hindsight I suspect they’re scripted. Watching him in college speeches it’s nothing but nonsense dressed in sesquipedalian loquaciousness.
What’s hilarious is a like an actually well done watchmen-esque, morally grey arc with a realistically compelling villain would kill it right now. Instead we get “SafeSpace and Snowflake”or whatever they were called .
At this point, Red Skull needs a show where he helps people with their problems for 20 minutes then, after everything been solved, and everyone's happy, he randomly pulls out a weapon or explosives and goes "Okay, now how about we go do some terrorisim?"
That basically seems to be his characterization. Self Help, Civic Nationalism, Let's work together to do something meaningful together and make the country a better place, while growing as individuals, SMASH CUT, terrorisim.
I guess that's what happens when your writers can't tell the difference between white bread conservatisim, and Nazis/Fascists. At this point they wouldn't even recognize actual Fascisim for what it is the meaning has been so distorted.
Hence why there's all this screeching about Jordan Peterson, but the continuous government overreach during covid must be defended as justified response to threat.
A lot of this you don't even need to be conservative to find agreeable...
This isn't even "Hitler was a vegetarian, animal lover who breathed air and drank water". This is like a bizarre Nega-Strawman:
"Nazis say you should eat healthy, get plenty of exercise, and improve yourself to achieve independence, so therefore the only moral position is to be a fat sack of shit who lives off of a diet consisting mostly of soy, and sits around waiting for government handouts all day."
Maybe they aren't quit there yet, but it's certainly starting to feel that way.
he helps people with their problems for 20 minutes then, after everything been solved, and everyone's happy, he randomly pulls out a weapon or explosives and goes "Okay, now how about we go do some terrorisim?"
When their entire worldview is morally inverted this is inevitable. Next issue, Red Skull sends Hydra agent to stand in front of a Christian bake shop that the heroes are trying to burn down. One of our heroes is tragically murdered when he heroically pulls a gun on the much more heavily armed Hydra agent.
...Is he supposed to be the good guy here? The artist clearly is trying to draw him like what he or she imagines Hitler would look like, and then it's all "The right of people is to exist, to pass down generational knowledge, and continue the family blood line."
These people view "The right of people is to exist, to pass down generational knowledge, and continue the family blood line" as nazism and fascism.
Hell, they are even statements like this:
" It�s about not-becoming because the notion of becoming is perceived as following the capitalist logic of production and models of success that are often tied up with colonialism. It asks, why the fuck should queers be nice? And asserts that politeness is heteronormative and we should embrace our utter failure at functioning within a colonialist, heteronormative, capitalist, racist, sexist and transphobic framework."
Depending on how extreme they are, civilization itself is nazism and must be torn down.
I think it only recently became more widely known because someone tweeted it to JBP. It's naturally going to take a while for this stuff to become well known as no one is reading these shit comics anyway.
Based Red Skull keeps his room clean.
Out of curiousity, I googled the latest Captain America news. Appareantly, the new Captain actor in the Disney+ series is getting death threats because of Chris Evan whores. Toxic femininity?
Jordan Peterson is controlled-opposition: another academic motormouth with a giant load of skeletons in his closet, and he's been chosen for you to represent you (because who wouldn't want a brain-fried drug-addict as their go-to philosopher?). The "tell" is that they're who the commies are always bitching about full-time, and you're always hearing about said bitching in the useless, tag-team kayfabe conservapundit alt-press. Avoid these SOBs like the plague. Never promote them. Never link them.
What makes you say he is controlled opposition? Despite going to church hundreds of times, he's the only one who got me to read the Bible with open eyes and ears. How is that a bad thing, exactly?
That comment is literally oozing “shill” I would ignore it.
Obviously a leftist got triggered by the use of his name.
"Juden Peterstein" has been a meme for quite some time now. Not saying I agree, I just don't think the dude above is a leftist shill
People who say that are leftist/Stormfag shills.
Required reading:
"...The same performance art can be seen in every single Christian circle. The enemy relentlessly seeks to elevate the weak, the stupid, and the fraudulent in order to obstruct the genuine leaders from rising...."
This is what the massively-downvoted poster above was getting at. (You see this phenomena everywhere around you once it "clicks". Politics, entertainment, religion, sports. You're strung along following electroplated heroes promoted into your attention-span who will then implode on cue when needed.)
Freshman congresscritters are an easy example of this phenomenon. The phony right can't stop incessantly yammering about AOC, and the phony left can't stop incessantly yammering about MTG, both of whom a basically mirror images of each other as powerless, low-level squawking parrots reeling off manicured talking-points like kayfabe wrestlers massaging their allotted mic time.
It's comic-book fight choreography, and they're treating you like eight year-olds.
""Juden Peterstein" has been a meme for quite some time now."
Is it? First I've heard of it.
My criticism of him comes from an entirely different angle.
(And as far as I am concerned, all neo-Nazi-esque groups are controlled fronts. The Deep State / Cabal doesn't care about communism, national-socialism, Fabianism, Jews, or whites; everyone is recruitable, everyone is expendable. For them, it's all a big game of 'let's you and him fight' while I sell both of you morons lots of weapons, making sure I have plenty of controlling video of everyone committing all sorts of crimes, and use your antics for explanations of what happened to the stock-market when the tape was painted the way I wanted.)
I've only heard of it because about a 1 year ago, someone showed up on /r/KiA2 who started calling him that. He happened to be a total psycho, as one would expect from someone posting such things.
It's not as if it's incredible common, because for that one guy, there were 100 other Stormfags posting nonsense like 'early life' and 'NOTICING'.
Same, I find the Jungian stuff to be totally unpersuasive to say the least. Everything that isn't that, I rather like.
Raise a hand if the first time you heard of Peterson was either:
<sudden internal gust of wind blows the roof off>
You make a good point. You can't expect every expert to talk about everything in one book, or even ever. Experts only really talk about things they know well, which is why they get paid to be experts.
The way you figure what a person is about is this technique: COMPARE WHAT THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT vs WHAT THEY CAN TALK ABOUT.
So:
he cannot talk about jews despite the fact that gulag archipelago thrust was the jew hatred of whites
he cannot talk about any of the other groups participating in in inter group competition, particularly muslims
he cannot talk about race and genetic differences between races
he cannot talk about in group preference
he cannot ever talk about the individual as part of the group, he only talks about the individual
he cannot talk about immigration
But:
he goes out of his way to say things like, you cannot take pride in your civilization because it wasn't built by you it was built by your ancestors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoTGmhczcY (around 2:22 mark)
he goes out of his way to emphasize the individual and atomize you.
he goes out of his way to explain that all of your success and happiness comes from individualism.
Notice the trend? Group identity bad, individualism good.
It's a slight of hand magic trick in 100 000 ponderous words or 30 years worth of lectures. Veeeeeery slow and methodical.
The presupposition driving Peterson is that WW2 was driven by in group preference and in group thinking so the solution is to keep propagandizing individualism and atomization and to keep groups of people in the west from getting together.
You will notice he doesn't go to India, China or Africa to preach this. He only does this in western countries.
Of course, individualism and group membership are two sides of the same coin. The individual exists BECAUSE of the group success, one is inseparable from the other. Individualism is important for the success of the group, success of the group is important for the success of individuals. As well, human brains are not single processing units, our brains are a set of subsystems, some very old, some very young, some highly co-related to other systems some less so. What this means is that we have parts of our brain that are dominant when we are individuals and other parts that are dominant when we are in groups ... this is why you are one person when you are alone BUT YOU ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT when you are in a group. Because you are a different person in a group, a different part of your brain with a different personality is driving you in that situation.
So, he has provided us with a great deal of insight and important information in a VERY VERY VERY NARROW WAY. Which is exacly what we want, we want precision.
But there is english on his queball. On the one hand, he cannot talk about certain things because he would literally get him self killed. On the other, the human mind is good at picking out patterns and if you ever felt there was something ooooooooddddly wrong with what he was saying, well its becaue of the list above: he is DELIBERATELY leaving out information and massaging the message.
You can use this is the technique to evaluate everyone, even here on win forums. It's a great tool.
I think I tend to lean on the individualists side, as I don't feel that the offspring is responsible for the sins of their fathers. I also don't think they are responsible for the successes of their fathers. I would just disagree with him on having pride in your people/country. I just don't view him in my mind as a politics character and I suppose the answer is "bro you're on KIA2 of course we look at things politically first and foremost", but, he's not very interesting to me politically. I like him for his religious stuff or profesionally for self authoring, and it's just so strange watching people get so heated around the topic of him.
Overall I at least see where you're coming from groups vs individuals. I just suppose I do lay more on his side of things. I was raised LDS and they have an article of faith that I didn't understand as a child that I think is the demarcation line that makes sense to me on that topic.
“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression”
Especially as someone who has sinned plenty during his lifetime, I have enough reasons that I myself can damn myself over, I don't need the guilt of every sin that my fore-fathers committed laid at my feet, and while I am literally in awe and have a deep reverence for what my fore-fathers did and for which I will always be thankful for, my honest conviction about what sort of responsibility or relationship we have with the past was what woke me up from being a lefist a long time ago. I wasn't about to repent for something I didn't do as I was already rather busy trying to make amends for my actions. The past is a source of pride and inspiration, but I don't feel any ownership over their actions, only that I should emulate the best of them.
That's the trick. The trick is to get you to think it is more one vs the other and that you have a choice. This isn't so at all. Individualism vs ingroup are there and present all the time with every action and every inaction you ever take.
You CANNOT take an action that either DOESN'T require the group or DOESN'T affect the group. It is utterly IMPOSSIBLE for the individual to exist, act and survive without the group.
Every action you take REQUIRES resources acquired and provisioned to you by the group. Simultaneously, every action you take either ADDS or TAKES away from the net / net resources of the group.
Lastly, your BIRTH / EXISTENCE is EXPLICITLY an expression of the ingroups existence and success.
You literally have no say in this whatsoever.
That is quite the quote there.
As well, once a persons starts to see the magic trick these charlatans are pulling, a kind of synthesis happens:
All of a sudden you can, simultaneously, see your purpose as an individual and purpose as a member of an in group.
All of a sudden you understand why you need to pick up the heaviest thing you can find and carry it and why it's important to clean your room bucko.
All of a sudden you have clarity beyond the horizon imposed on you by charlatans, you have access to the full database instead of a tiny column of data over there in the corner that these people need you to be slaves to.
All of a sudden all of our myths and history have meaning and every black and white photo comes to life and every 40 000 year old etching on a cave in France has deep deep spiritual and transitive quality.
All of a sudden you understand why you exist and you understand the maximum potential meaning of your life will have accumulated at your death bed.
All of a sudden death, life and the present have new meaning.
There are reasons they want us to forget the past and become atomized. This isn't by accident.
I mean I agree, the only thing is that the only groups that have static boundaries are families. Nations, Races, and Religions are always drifting and changing, sometimes quickly, usually slowly, but still.
And here is where the rubber meets the road.
If you are the glorious expression of your peoples survival for 500 000 years or more in conditions so harsh you cannot fathom it (ever consider going out into the woods naked with no camping gear, no tools and try to survive for week?), just how much reverence do you have for the continuation of your lineage?
THIS is the goal of the magic trick. A magic trick has two components: HIDE INFORMATION (don't tell them the whole truth) and REDIRECT THEIR FOCUS to an area that is beneficial to you. All magic tricks are exactly this slight of hand.
The moment you start to see ALL OF THE INFORMATION and the moment you start to FOCUS ON YOUR SURVIVAL is the moment you are focused on the survival of your people.
The only question here is, DO YOU control your access to information and your focus or does your enemy.
"What makes you say he is controlled opposition?"
You are not promoted by the establishment unless you're controlled-opposition. And how are you promoted? They talk about you constantly.
It's all political kayfabe.
Well it depends on what you mean by God...
He's most likely not, but there's things that get people suspicious. I think the biggest thing is that he wont call out the jew. Here's the clip most people who call him a jewish shill post.
Huge JP fan here (though I haven't listened to him much lately - the IDW has become as a whole very cringeworthy to me now). I have never seen this before.
In his defense, publicly speaking about the JQ is risky, especially for such a large public figure. Even if he answered thoughtfully and in good faith, it would be taken out of context and him and his family would recieve 1000x more hell than they've already received. Would you talk about the JQ if you were JBP? I am not sure if I would.
Ok then.
I'd probably be more willing to say "I can't honestly answer that without risking my loved ones" instead of just sidestepping it entirely when it's central to 90% of what he talks about. He constantly brings up the last century, but it's always the Nahzeeees, and virtually never the communists.
Wrong, he talks about the communists as much if not moreso than the nazis. I have watched all of his lectures and many of his interviews.
Ah, that fills out the picture. I really hope 200 Years Together gets fully translated one day. I'm on Vol 2 out of 3 of The Gulag Archipelago and I'm certainly interested in what else he had to say, even if he wrote it far after the events had transpired.
We should have known when YouTube was pushing him to the front page. He has some killer moments in interviews but in hindsight I suspect they’re scripted. Watching him in college speeches it’s nothing but nonsense dressed in sesquipedalian loquaciousness.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12: Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This is more an opinion, and not what that rule is about.
The reporter knew that when they submitted. Therefore, I'd like to report them, whoever they are, for lying. I.e., the very save rule: Falsehoods.
Marvel has been making Red Skull look like a better human being than half the population for years now.
Edit: UNINTENTIONALLY at that
What’s hilarious is a like an actually well done watchmen-esque, morally grey arc with a realistically compelling villain would kill it right now. Instead we get “SafeSpace and Snowflake”or whatever they were called .
We need The Crazed Condiment to realize Gothamites are just hot dogs in human clothing.
Red pulled Red Skull
At this point, Red Skull needs a show where he helps people with their problems for 20 minutes then, after everything been solved, and everyone's happy, he randomly pulls out a weapon or explosives and goes "Okay, now how about we go do some terrorisim?"
That basically seems to be his characterization. Self Help, Civic Nationalism, Let's work together to do something meaningful together and make the country a better place, while growing as individuals, SMASH CUT, terrorisim.
I guess that's what happens when your writers can't tell the difference between white bread conservatisim, and Nazis/Fascists. At this point they wouldn't even recognize actual Fascisim for what it is the meaning has been so distorted.
Hence why there's all this screeching about Jordan Peterson, but the continuous government overreach during covid must be defended as justified response to threat.
A lot of this you don't even need to be conservative to find agreeable...
This isn't even "Hitler was a vegetarian, animal lover who breathed air and drank water". This is like a bizarre Nega-Strawman:
"Nazis say you should eat healthy, get plenty of exercise, and improve yourself to achieve independence, so therefore the only moral position is to be a fat sack of shit who lives off of a diet consisting mostly of soy, and sits around waiting for government handouts all day."
Maybe they aren't quit there yet, but it's certainly starting to feel that way.
Far Cry 4 true ending flashbacks
Crab Rangoon intensifies
Dude just wanted to spend time with his son :'(
What the government is doing with covid restrictions and vaccine passports is almost literal fascism.
And it is 100% supported by most of the "liberals". They wouldn't know fascism if it stuck a needle in their ass.
They wouldn't know fascism if it swabbed their urethra under the pretense of testing for SARS-19.
"It's like he only knows how to get things done in an evil way." -Yahtzee, Knack review
Marvel is still trash? Not surprised. And people wonder why no one reads comics anymore. Just read manga.
When their entire worldview is morally inverted this is inevitable. Next issue, Red Skull sends Hydra agent to stand in front of a Christian bake shop that the heroes are trying to burn down. One of our heroes is tragically murdered when he heroically pulls a gun on the much more heavily armed Hydra agent.
Leave it to an upjumped negro to make a nazi look reasonable.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with Coates? Did a white man steal his bread when he was young?
Obligatory Based Red Skull
...Is he supposed to be the good guy here? The artist clearly is trying to draw him like what he or she imagines Hitler would look like, and then it's all "The right of people is to exist, to pass down generational knowledge, and continue the family blood line."
These people view "The right of people is to exist, to pass down generational knowledge, and continue the family blood line" as nazism and fascism.
Hell, they are even statements like this:
" It�s about not-becoming because the notion of becoming is perceived as following the capitalist logic of production and models of success that are often tied up with colonialism. It asks, why the fuck should queers be nice? And asserts that politeness is heteronormative and we should embrace our utter failure at functioning within a colonialist, heteronormative, capitalist, racist, sexist and transphobic framework."
Depending on how extreme they are, civilization itself is nazism and must be torn down.
Apparently, the next page is new recruit strapping up as a suicide bomber.
I would prefer the Red Skulls 10 rules before the Marvel crap anytime.
oh god Red Skull is advocating for alternative self-help practices somebody stop him.
Who cares? If you do, you shouldn't.
Stop watching garbage, and go out and conquer the world, like men.
Should I care about this controlled opposition, unapologetic douchenozzle? Nah.
I think it only recently became more widely known because someone tweeted it to JBP. It's naturally going to take a while for this stuff to become well known as no one is reading these shit comics anyway.