I want to highlight this because it is vital. The bulwark against the current shitshow will not be found in institutions that are simply Right wing, they must be institutions that are keenly aware of and actively hostile to the threat that the Left represents.
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
It'd be nice to operate in an environment in which it's possible to have an honest debate between left and right, hash out the best ideas of each - I'm not naive enough to think the right has a monopoly on being right about everything for all time.
It's unfortunate because the left, having lost a lot of these arguments, collectively decided to embark upon a project whereby they'd simply infiltrate and eradicate any institution that held a right-wing position so they'd be able to win by default. I think it truly says something that this was regarded as the easier path than coming up with arguments that didn't fail almost every test.
The left has made the anti-left position a necessity because of their hegemonic fixation.
Correct.
Any institution that is not expressly anti-marxist eventually becomes marxist. Always.
Unless an institution is comprised of anit-marxist people who are wide awake to marxist tactics, that institution will be infiltrated and subverted over time until it is fully marxist-controlled.
It needs to be understood that as soon as one marxist gets into a position of power, they will immediately attempt to open the door for other marxists, and close it for non-marxists.
I don't doubt it. But there's a sliding scale of people that are willing to adapt to support people and their tribe. The easier you make it for people to donate USD through a right wing Paypal/Google/Apple Pay service, with a right wing bank that won't cut off your finances for saying it's okay to be white, the more leeway you have to get the message out and build culture without worrying about the death deplatforming squads.
Anyone who thinks cryptocurrency is the answer doesn't understand cryptocurrency. People think that cryptocurrency serves the underdog, but it doesn't - it serves whoever wields the most power in an attempt to control it. That's not you, it's the CCP, or Google, or Amazon. What we need is a payment processor controlled by someone who actively works to prevent it being subverted, not crypto's open invitation to the world.
Well, unless someone can come up with a moneyless system (which even the bull-moose commies and Roddenberry-ites can't seem to imagine), the only real competitor for the currency system is good old-fashioned barter.
(Of course, the only reason humans do "higher" things for fun in the Trek world, is because someone already took away all the television, movies, and social media as distractions. Oh, and drugs and real alcohol, too. So they might as well learn how to paint.)
If the choice is to embrace Islam or be required to publicly proclaim a man can turn into a woman by wishing in order to participate in normal society, then Ash-hadu an la ilaha ill Allah
Force every uppty female to cover up and pop out babies or by Allah she’ll taste the stones.
Sounds worth the bowing 5 times a day shit.
Hell, you’ll either shut down feminism overnight, or you’ll get them to start attacking Islam, which means a whole bunch of irate Arabs are going to start beheading them.
I am actively advocating anti-parallel institution building. While we do that, we need to engage in Civil Disobedience against what we persevere to be unlawful, unconstitutional, or otherwise illegitimate doctrine.
This will cause violent and aggressive reactions against us by the establishment, but it will also undermine the establishment's position further. We can take losses and maintain our own defensive structures while they expend their limited hard-power resources to attempt at convincing others to destroy us, because they really won't be able to do it themselves.
Once the system seizes up, we rebuild the new system from our own positions.
James is a left-wing institutionalist, so he thinks the destruction of our leftist institutions is a defeat and a significant loss.
It won't be.
That's why we need to build anti-Left institutions now.
I want to highlight this because it is vital. The bulwark against the current shitshow will not be found in institutions that are simply Right wing, they must be institutions that are keenly aware of and actively hostile to the threat that the Left represents.
Unfortunately, I agree with you. It'd be nice to operate in an environment in which it's possible to have an honest debate between left and right, hash out the best ideas of each - I'm not naive enough to think the right has a monopoly on being right about everything for all time. It's unfortunate because the left, having lost a lot of these arguments, collectively decided to embark upon a project whereby they'd simply infiltrate and eradicate any institution that held a right-wing position so they'd be able to win by default. I think it truly says something that this was regarded as the easier path than coming up with arguments that didn't fail almost every test. The left has made the anti-left position a necessity because of their hegemonic fixation.
It's okay to have them participate as members. But under no circumstance should they be allowed to hold power.
Correct. Any institution that is not expressly anti-marxist eventually becomes marxist. Always.
Unless an institution is comprised of anit-marxist people who are wide awake to marxist tactics, that institution will be infiltrated and subverted over time until it is fully marxist-controlled.
It needs to be understood that as soon as one marxist gets into a position of power, they will immediately attempt to open the door for other marxists, and close it for non-marxists.
Agreed.
The number one thing we need right now is a bank/payment processor. From what I've seen, that's the biggest hurdle for a lot of the deplorables.
Honestly, that's gonna have to be trading in crypto and metals
I don't doubt it. But there's a sliding scale of people that are willing to adapt to support people and their tribe. The easier you make it for people to donate USD through a right wing Paypal/Google/Apple Pay service, with a right wing bank that won't cut off your finances for saying it's okay to be white, the more leeway you have to get the message out and build culture without worrying about the
deathdeplatforming squads.Anyone who thinks cryptocurrency is the answer doesn't understand cryptocurrency. People think that cryptocurrency serves the underdog, but it doesn't - it serves whoever wields the most power in an attempt to control it. That's not you, it's the CCP, or Google, or Amazon. What we need is a payment processor controlled by someone who actively works to prevent it being subverted, not crypto's open invitation to the world.
Well, unless someone can come up with a moneyless system (which even the bull-moose commies and Roddenberry-ites can't seem to imagine), the only real competitor for the currency system is good old-fashioned barter.
(Of course, the only reason humans do "higher" things for fun in the Trek world, is because someone already took away all the television, movies, and social media as distractions. Oh, and drugs and real alcohol, too. So they might as well learn how to paint.)
We work with what we have, and when it comes to finance... this is what we have.
That or we just ship silver coins at each other.
If the choice is to embrace Islam or be required to publicly proclaim a man can turn into a woman by wishing in order to participate in normal society, then Ash-hadu an la ilaha ill Allah
Sounds worth the bowing 5 times a day shit.
Hell, you’ll either shut down feminism overnight, or you’ll get them to start attacking Islam, which means a whole bunch of irate Arabs are going to start beheading them.
Either way it will be fucking hilarious.
كافر
Can't go with you on that.
eww.
What those CIA guys did was totally unnecessary. It gives torturers a bad name.
I'm willing to entertain the possibility of pyrrhic victory before I am willing to admit the possibility of defeat.
I can't remember the exact term used, but a user here was talking about civil disobedience or something?
That was me.
I am actively advocating anti-parallel institution building. While we do that, we need to engage in Civil Disobedience against what we persevere to be unlawful, unconstitutional, or otherwise illegitimate doctrine.
This will cause violent and aggressive reactions against us by the establishment, but it will also undermine the establishment's position further. We can take losses and maintain our own defensive structures while they expend their limited hard-power resources to attempt at convincing others to destroy us, because they really won't be able to do it themselves.
Once the system seizes up, we rebuild the new system from our own positions.