I want to highlight this because it is vital. The bulwark against the current shitshow will not be found in institutions that are simply Right wing, they must be institutions that are keenly aware of and actively hostile to the threat that the Left represents.
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
It'd be nice to operate in an environment in which it's possible to have an honest debate between left and right, hash out the best ideas of each - I'm not naive enough to think the right has a monopoly on being right about everything for all time.
It's unfortunate because the left, having lost a lot of these arguments, collectively decided to embark upon a project whereby they'd simply infiltrate and eradicate any institution that held a right-wing position so they'd be able to win by default. I think it truly says something that this was regarded as the easier path than coming up with arguments that didn't fail almost every test.
The left has made the anti-left position a necessity because of their hegemonic fixation.
Correct.
Any institution that is not expressly anti-marxist eventually becomes marxist. Always.
Unless an institution is comprised of anit-marxist people who are wide awake to marxist tactics, that institution will be infiltrated and subverted over time until it is fully marxist-controlled.
It needs to be understood that as soon as one marxist gets into a position of power, they will immediately attempt to open the door for other marxists, and close it for non-marxists.
I want to highlight this because it is vital. The bulwark against the current shitshow will not be found in institutions that are simply Right wing, they must be institutions that are keenly aware of and actively hostile to the threat that the Left represents.
Unfortunately, I agree with you. It'd be nice to operate in an environment in which it's possible to have an honest debate between left and right, hash out the best ideas of each - I'm not naive enough to think the right has a monopoly on being right about everything for all time. It's unfortunate because the left, having lost a lot of these arguments, collectively decided to embark upon a project whereby they'd simply infiltrate and eradicate any institution that held a right-wing position so they'd be able to win by default. I think it truly says something that this was regarded as the easier path than coming up with arguments that didn't fail almost every test. The left has made the anti-left position a necessity because of their hegemonic fixation.
It's okay to have them participate as members. But under no circumstance should they be allowed to hold power.
Correct. Any institution that is not expressly anti-marxist eventually becomes marxist. Always.
Unless an institution is comprised of anit-marxist people who are wide awake to marxist tactics, that institution will be infiltrated and subverted over time until it is fully marxist-controlled.
It needs to be understood that as soon as one marxist gets into a position of power, they will immediately attempt to open the door for other marxists, and close it for non-marxists.
Agreed.