You can capture almost every purported leftist belief with the combination of disparate impact theory and blank slate theory. The first claims to objectively investigate any system that generates disparate outcomes while the second guarantees that the aforementioned investigation will only discover oppression as the cause of disparity.
Underlying this academic ruse are resentment and envy, which comprise the temperamental component of virtually every leftist political movement. These people are taken by destructive emotions directed at anyone who succeeds through discipline and work ethic. Redistributive policy is a manifestation of that resentment and envy, and that policy draws the support of irredeemable people.
The way I see it is that "leftism" as we call it is the belief that man made beliefs are more powerful than natural truth. It doesn't matter what the natural truth is if you can get the vast majority of the public to behave as if it's not true.
It is driven by things like envy and resentment, but also ego and overconfidence. Obviously this house of cards will not last forever, but it may become big enough that when it does fall it takes the whole human race or intelligent life in general with it.
Ask yourself what the goal of a healthy society is.
The goal of a leftist society is to put leftists in unearned positions of privolege and power, feeding the lazy and envious thieves with a system that only functions when enough debt-slaves and wagecucks are enslaved and forced to serve it. They want you farming their free grapes while you are forced to eat bugs.
Not all ideas are equal. Not all people are equal. Trying to forcefully equalize people means holding back the healthy so they can't outrun the lazy. It means silencing the smart so they don't correct the "experts" and embarass them. It means treating a white person's right to live and an imported sub-saharan sub-80 IQ serial rapist's right to live equally, despite the absurdity of such an act. This anarcho-tyranny where the law treats some racial castes with kid gloves and makes an example out of uppity whites... You already know it's unhealthy.
The goal of a healthy society is to do what is best for its people. Not the ruling class, but the vital people that earn their keep. For a healthy society to remain healthy it needs a clear vision of who its people are and who they should be. A healthy society does what's best for the physical and mental health of its citizens, providing them with opportunities to succeed based solely on merit, and an education grounded in science and reality rather than today's marxist indoctrination dog-training only traitors willingly subject their children to. A healthy society won't try to brainwash you and sell you the "work hard enough for some lucky billionaire's corporation and you'll surely be successful!" lie because a healthy society doesn't need a class of easily-duped useful-idiot worker bees so it can afford to keep its neediest mouths fed. The government should do what healthy people can't do for themselves and no more. The people of the nation and the futures of their children should be its highest priority.
Look at the problems facing America today and the wishy-washy liberal ideas that caused them. Liberalism always gives way to leftist tyranny and calls any alternative to its tyranny a tyrant. Liberalism doesn't work. Good people might want to put others first but you can't save anyone if you can't save yourselves. And good people will need to save themselves if they want to survive this one-sided leftist war or ever get back their human rights and peace.
Not everyone can prosper. Some people will fail despite the best efforts of "no child left behind" policies. People should have human rights but some people are more human than others. Hollywood loves to depict anyone who understands this as a violent monster who wants culling for anyone who isn't airy enough, or whatever hollywood's boo-word for whites is. Why? Because they don't want you questioning if it's really in your best interest to spend your life as a wage slave whose taxes fund a government more interested in buying the fleeting love of imported ethnically self-interested invasive voter blocs than your wellbeing and the wellbeing of your family and children. And what kind of rational society is terrified of questioning why America gives away so much money to Israel? This society is slowly rotting away because of all the leftist parasites, and the drones just follow the bad ideas they were taught by this dying society and the government's schools growing up. This dying society promotes sicknesses over health, treats those of the luckier skin tones and the luckier sex better than better people, and sabotages the development of children in the name of spite.
Anything's better than more of this leftist communist anarcho-tyranny. Absolutely anything.
The Left is evil. "The Right" is absolutely all alternatives to that evil, whether they actually oppose the left or not. There is no center. The left are pedophiles who want power and will say and do anything to get power and keep power. They can't be reasoned with. Locking them in straightjackets amd padded rooms, and deporting their sub-80 IQ Useful Idiot imported voters is the peaceful solution.
Putting up with their abuses won't make them stop. Asking them to stop won't reverse their demograohic war on you. Saying "moral" things like "I don't agree with what you have to say but I'll still die to protect your right to say it" will not impress them. They want you broke or raped or dead or all of the above and they think it's funny.
I'd be arrested if I told you to treat them how they brag about wanting to treat you.
Is the idea, that lefty beliefs taken to their non-extreme are somehow virtuous? Because equality is immoral regardless if it takes the form of welfare state or handicapper general.
I wish I could shove a copy of my Rudyard Kipling poem collection into every head in America. The Gods of the Copybook Headings summarizes our present problems better than any text I've read. Prepare for the terror and slaughter, because the Gods of the Copybook Headings will return.
Everybody knows Kipling wrote "something racist" but nobody knows he grew up in India and preferred the native Indians to most englishmen. He had a tonne of respect for the Indians, but was somehow still a huge racist. Somehow.
Extreme? This has been the goal of leftists since that bitch ass Marx wrote his manifesto after fapping to Rousseau, Engels and Kant while not understanding a damn thing he read, like all commie scum.
There's some logical fallacies in your arguments, so I'd not use those ones necessarily.
Your last, final point, for example. It is the exact same as saying "white people commit far more rape than black people in the USA, and therefore are clearly more evil". The proposition is an entirely true statement, the conclusion is a blatant lie through statistics. White people DO commit more rapes. Obviously they do. They're 6-7x the population. Black people could rape 500% more than white people per-capita, and white people would STILL have a huge lead in rape count. Likewise, OBVIOUSLY organized group Christianity has done more charity work than a non-movement non-group does in the name of its non-group non-movement that is also one one-tenth the size.
And you're missing what is probably the most important point: Collectivism vs Individualism
"China, which prizes social cohesion over accomplishment and personal responsibility, let COVID out of a Wuhan lab as a consequence of their lack of personal morality" would be a MUCH better springboard for a soapbox.
Atheism isn't actually a lefty belief. It's a right-wing one, ironically. Everyone grouping up under one identity, splitting groups by identity known as "religion", and then judging who is better or worse based on their identity group instead of their individual personage, that's SUPER left-wing, maximum identity politics. Discarding religion, discarding labels and just doing what you personally view as the best action to take, is HIGHLY individualistic. The issue is these cultic morons found a new religion in Wokeness, instead of actually just being atheistic and individualistic.
Congratulations, though, you're a left-winger. You like big organized groups based on identity, because of the increased efficiency they have over individual rights and actions. Introspect on that. You're just a left-winger who disagrees with the current left-wing identity group.
It's called "Assemblywomen." Lysistrata is another play by the same guy. Read the synopsis of it at least, it's fucking fascinating how the same garbage women were whining about in 400 BC is still being whined about today.
Eve didn't doom humanity. Adam and Eve did it together--jointly. Adam lied to God and tried to hide what he had done, and he knew it was the fruit of the tree of good and evil when he tried it. Don't give that guy a pass, he was just much to blame as Eve.
If we look at that story, you could probably say Adam's even worse than Eve was. She told the serpent they could eat from everything but that one tree but the serpent lied to her. Adam doesn't even do anything, no "hey we aren't supposed to eat that." No refusing, he just takes the fruit without question and eats it.
But honestly, arguing which one was worse is stupid (but hey, perfectly fine if you want to say why women or men are icky and gross I guess) because both Adam and Eve made the conscious choice to eat the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. Eve didn't force Adam to eat it, the serpent didn't force Eve to eat it.
Because weak people need strong leadership structures and lacking the identity group and command structure of religion, they seek out oppression in different areas.
You can capture almost every purported leftist belief with the combination of disparate impact theory and blank slate theory. The first claims to objectively investigate any system that generates disparate outcomes while the second guarantees that the aforementioned investigation will only discover oppression as the cause of disparity.
Underlying this academic ruse are resentment and envy, which comprise the temperamental component of virtually every leftist political movement. These people are taken by destructive emotions directed at anyone who succeeds through discipline and work ethic. Redistributive policy is a manifestation of that resentment and envy, and that policy draws the support of irredeemable people.
The way I see it is that "leftism" as we call it is the belief that man made beliefs are more powerful than natural truth. It doesn't matter what the natural truth is if you can get the vast majority of the public to behave as if it's not true.
It is driven by things like envy and resentment, but also ego and overconfidence. Obviously this house of cards will not last forever, but it may become big enough that when it does fall it takes the whole human race or intelligent life in general with it.
It wouldn't be too much of a stretch to simplify things to "The Left is just the political manifestation of Evil".
Ask yourself what the goal of a healthy society is.
The goal of a leftist society is to put leftists in unearned positions of privolege and power, feeding the lazy and envious thieves with a system that only functions when enough debt-slaves and wagecucks are enslaved and forced to serve it. They want you farming their free grapes while you are forced to eat bugs.
Not all ideas are equal. Not all people are equal. Trying to forcefully equalize people means holding back the healthy so they can't outrun the lazy. It means silencing the smart so they don't correct the "experts" and embarass them. It means treating a white person's right to live and an imported sub-saharan sub-80 IQ serial rapist's right to live equally, despite the absurdity of such an act. This anarcho-tyranny where the law treats some racial castes with kid gloves and makes an example out of uppity whites... You already know it's unhealthy.
The goal of a healthy society is to do what is best for its people. Not the ruling class, but the vital people that earn their keep. For a healthy society to remain healthy it needs a clear vision of who its people are and who they should be. A healthy society does what's best for the physical and mental health of its citizens, providing them with opportunities to succeed based solely on merit, and an education grounded in science and reality rather than today's marxist indoctrination dog-training only traitors willingly subject their children to. A healthy society won't try to brainwash you and sell you the "work hard enough for some lucky billionaire's corporation and you'll surely be successful!" lie because a healthy society doesn't need a class of easily-duped useful-idiot worker bees so it can afford to keep its neediest mouths fed. The government should do what healthy people can't do for themselves and no more. The people of the nation and the futures of their children should be its highest priority.
Look at the problems facing America today and the wishy-washy liberal ideas that caused them. Liberalism always gives way to leftist tyranny and calls any alternative to its tyranny a tyrant. Liberalism doesn't work. Good people might want to put others first but you can't save anyone if you can't save yourselves. And good people will need to save themselves if they want to survive this one-sided leftist war or ever get back their human rights and peace.
Not everyone can prosper. Some people will fail despite the best efforts of "no child left behind" policies. People should have human rights but some people are more human than others. Hollywood loves to depict anyone who understands this as a violent monster who wants culling for anyone who isn't airy enough, or whatever hollywood's boo-word for whites is. Why? Because they don't want you questioning if it's really in your best interest to spend your life as a wage slave whose taxes fund a government more interested in buying the fleeting love of imported ethnically self-interested invasive voter blocs than your wellbeing and the wellbeing of your family and children. And what kind of rational society is terrified of questioning why America gives away so much money to Israel? This society is slowly rotting away because of all the leftist parasites, and the drones just follow the bad ideas they were taught by this dying society and the government's schools growing up. This dying society promotes sicknesses over health, treats those of the luckier skin tones and the luckier sex better than better people, and sabotages the development of children in the name of spite.
Anything's better than more of this leftist communist anarcho-tyranny. Absolutely anything.
The Left is evil. "The Right" is absolutely all alternatives to that evil, whether they actually oppose the left or not. There is no center. The left are pedophiles who want power and will say and do anything to get power and keep power. They can't be reasoned with. Locking them in straightjackets amd padded rooms, and deporting their sub-80 IQ Useful Idiot imported voters is the peaceful solution.
Putting up with their abuses won't make them stop. Asking them to stop won't reverse their demograohic war on you. Saying "moral" things like "I don't agree with what you have to say but I'll still die to protect your right to say it" will not impress them. They want you broke or raped or dead or all of the above and they think it's funny.
I'd be arrested if I told you to treat them how they brag about wanting to treat you.
Slippery slope is slippery
Is the idea, that lefty beliefs taken to their non-extreme are somehow virtuous? Because equality is immoral regardless if it takes the form of welfare state or handicapper general.
Life was designed to evolve. Evolution wasn't designed to have the results of life's tests "Equalized" to favour scum and hamstring the best.
I wish I could shove a copy of my Rudyard Kipling poem collection into every head in America. The Gods of the Copybook Headings summarizes our present problems better than any text I've read. Prepare for the terror and slaughter, because the Gods of the Copybook Headings will return.
Kipling is king. He's given bad press these days though.
Yeah, that's what happens when you write a poem satirizing the White Man's Burden and people take it as sincere.
Everybody knows Kipling wrote "something racist" but nobody knows he grew up in India and preferred the native Indians to most englishmen. He had a tonne of respect for the Indians, but was somehow still a huge racist. Somehow.
"You're a better man than I, Gunga Din"
You are wonderful, I need a way to put teleporting bears into my RPG, a displacer beast variant perhaps?
I'd make it a Dire-variant blink dog over a displacer beast.
If prayer wont get me teleporting cyberbears with a thirst for leftist blood, then perhaps science will! ... Does anyone know a mad scientist?
Extreme? This has been the goal of leftists since that bitch ass Marx wrote his manifesto after fapping to Rousseau, Engels and Kant while not understanding a damn thing he read, like all commie scum.
There's some logical fallacies in your arguments, so I'd not use those ones necessarily.
Your last, final point, for example. It is the exact same as saying "white people commit far more rape than black people in the USA, and therefore are clearly more evil". The proposition is an entirely true statement, the conclusion is a blatant lie through statistics. White people DO commit more rapes. Obviously they do. They're 6-7x the population. Black people could rape 500% more than white people per-capita, and white people would STILL have a huge lead in rape count. Likewise, OBVIOUSLY organized group Christianity has done more charity work than a non-movement non-group does in the name of its non-group non-movement that is also one one-tenth the size.
And you're missing what is probably the most important point: Collectivism vs Individualism
"China, which prizes social cohesion over accomplishment and personal responsibility, let COVID out of a Wuhan lab as a consequence of their lack of personal morality" would be a MUCH better springboard for a soapbox.
Atheism isn't actually a lefty belief. It's a right-wing one, ironically. Everyone grouping up under one identity, splitting groups by identity known as "religion", and then judging who is better or worse based on their identity group instead of their individual personage, that's SUPER left-wing, maximum identity politics. Discarding religion, discarding labels and just doing what you personally view as the best action to take, is HIGHLY individualistic. The issue is these cultic morons found a new religion in Wokeness, instead of actually just being atheistic and individualistic.
Congratulations, though, you're a left-winger. You like big organized groups based on identity, because of the increased efficiency they have over individual rights and actions. Introspect on that. You're just a left-winger who disagrees with the current left-wing identity group.
Atheism stumbles worse than Christianity when it comes to opposing Feminism. Why do you think that is?
The Bible opens with a woman dooming humanity. It really sets the tone imho.
Lmao the Greeks had a hilarious play about how women vote with their feelings when they get power.
What play is that?
It's called "Assemblywomen." Lysistrata is another play by the same guy. Read the synopsis of it at least, it's fucking fascinating how the same garbage women were whining about in 400 BC is still being whined about today.
I forgot its name but feminists are still mad about it
Probably this?
Eve didn't doom humanity. Adam and Eve did it together--jointly. Adam lied to God and tried to hide what he had done, and he knew it was the fruit of the tree of good and evil when he tried it. Don't give that guy a pass, he was just much to blame as Eve.
Adam was the first simp. He put his trust in his woman rather than God.
If we look at that story, you could probably say Adam's even worse than Eve was. She told the serpent they could eat from everything but that one tree but the serpent lied to her. Adam doesn't even do anything, no "hey we aren't supposed to eat that." No refusing, he just takes the fruit without question and eats it.
But honestly, arguing which one was worse is stupid (but hey, perfectly fine if you want to say why women or men are icky and gross I guess) because both Adam and Eve made the conscious choice to eat the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. Eve didn't force Adam to eat it, the serpent didn't force Eve to eat it.
Because weak people need strong leadership structures and lacking the identity group and command structure of religion, they seek out oppression in different areas.