wikipedia is hijacked by activists. Never true when it is political.
And a lot of science on it is also false.
The leftists and Ukraine propagandists have been hijacking these sites right from the start. And they make up lies for everything.
The Scott Ritter I talk about is involved in arms reduction during the cold war. He exposed that Iraq did not have "Weapons of Mass Destruction". Before the US invaded it (illegally). And was attacked by the neocons ever since.
How can we ever trust accusations from those sources. When these same people have been making up lies to attack Julian Assange.
They are following the same script as in Ukraine.
From Scott Ritter (who married a woman from Georgia), most people in Georgia already know that the EU/US want to abuse them. And this has been demonstrated openly in talks with the EU. They see how Ukraine people are used as cannonfodder (over 1 million dead), while they get a carrot-on-a-stick for EU /NATO acceptance.
The problem is that a lot of money is brought in to pay for actors and assassins. But because the Georgians know the enemy, they are ready to oppose a possible revolution.
That fake 88 billion is a confession of the DNC of how many illegal immigrants have been dragged in. The immigrants were paid money to get in. The total damage and cost is exceeding that fake number by far.
And the border security was completely broken. The restoration of basic border security is a military task. The 1 trillion that is now spend on foreign wars in corrupt countries can radically be reduced.
I do need some feedback. Thanks.
I wanted to make a 3D animation to explain this part better.
The wine-glass analogy is indeed confusing.
Below I will try to explain resonance of light and the electron-shell. And compare this to the Photon-model. I hope this will be clearer.
In atomic theories, the electrons of atoms are modeled as rings (Bohr) or as clouds or as probability waves (Quantum Mechanics).
In atomic scanning experiments we see either (1) spheres or (2) almost empty space. I picked the sphere model without good explanation.
In the photo-electric effect the light-wave is very large compared to the atom. The electron-shell causes a dielectric effect. This means that the center of the electric charge of the atom shifts up and down. This resonates with the light. It is why a prism can give us the light-spectrum
Explained by 3blue1brown
What happens at the exact resonance frequency? - The electrons start to move to a different orbit (or different electron-shell).
Depending on the circumstances, these electrons can then move away from the atom, or from the surface of a material.
With gas atoms we can calculate and observe the electron-bands that relate to certain frequencies. This gives the emission spectrum bands.
With solid materials you can get a wide range of resonance frequencies. So if light is causing the release of an electron, the additional energy can also add kinetic energy to this electron.
So the photo-electric effect is just resonance. And it works differently if you have a solid or a gas.
Roughly described, Einstein's model of the photo-electric effect is more like light-bullets that shoot electron-particles out of orbit.
The spectral lines of gas show how this model fails. The gas only reacts to the certain frequencies of the light, and higher frequencies simply pass through.
According to the Einstein the higher frequencies should give more kinetic energy to the atoms. Which is not true in gas.
Light also transfers momentum via dielectric reactions, not via "photons". Explained in this video Why light has momentum even without mass?. Which is why light can also be used to hold small objects in space. example
Don't worry about your lack of knowledge. Knowledge without intelligence is not very useful. And many modern scientists are lacking intelligence and critical thinking.
I think you refer to:
No Black Holes Exist, Says Stephen Hawking—At Least Not Like We Think - Black holes do not have "event horizons" beyond which there is no return, according to renowned physicist.
I think he is just bending the black-hole theory. From his theory, the quantum mechanics can cause stuff to escape a black-hole. The astronomers need that theory, because a lot of stuff escapes from "black-holes". We see very powerful plasma beams, like this one
I think that every part of the black-hole theory is broken. All black-hole images are just simulations and art. It is just a belief that they exist. And this belief blocks scientists from studying what is really going on.
I have written articles that debunk:
1- the "photo electric effect" , for which Einstein got the Nobel prize.
2- black holes . For which Hawking got the Nobel prize.
I am still looking for honest replies that can show even a doubt in my debunking. But just based on observations and basic physics and logic, both Einstein and Hawking are now in the Bullshit category.
I noticed that especially with astronomy. They make up invisible things whenever they need to. Just to keep the ancient hypotheses alive.
There is also a bias towards hype-subjects. As long they are in line with the beliefs of the peers. When someone discovers "something new" with hardly any evidence, it gets so much hype that they promote it as "the best thing ever". Like: AI and Crisper (DNA manipulation).
I write about things that are broken in science.:
http://thescienceanalyst.substack.com
When will they tell us that Ukraine are controlled by Nazis?
Note: These Ukraine Nazis are Bandera supporters, and more extreme than the Nazis in WW2 Germany. They see themselves as superior. They were involved in killing a lot of Polish, and using other people in the front-line as cannon-fodder.
We see the same thing today. They use other people as cannon-fodder, usually picked from the street. They still kill civilians. What seems new is that they stage fake events with a lot of media support to blame the others. A bit like how Mussolini used the media to create fake reporting.
I keep posting this overview, to show that the manufacturers knew that it was not safe (nor effective). The experimental injections are not safe and not effective
Now there is a nice place where all the Syrian refugees can go to..