It was like watching every single person forget every single thing they'd ever learned about medicine ever.
Exactly.
What helped me understand some of this craziness was Mattias Desmet's research into "mass formation". This was caused by military hypnosis tactics "4th level warfare". In many countries, these military were also involved directly and instructed the media to produce certain articles. Including the staged news and crisis actors.
Desmet's research warned me that aggressive resistance would be used by the insane to become more violent against the sane people. We saw that in some cases were people were strangled/suffocated, because they did not wear a mask.
Making insane people look silly and foolish did seem to work.
I forgot to add the problems with the global Covid19 mRNA experiment.
Generally it is dangerous because the mRNA and its spike-protein can get everywhere in the body, in random doses. It causes all kinds of damage. The mRNA causes inflammation from the immune system (like inflammation of brain or heart), and the spike-protein causes long-covid like symptoms. Unlike the virus, this stuff is directly spreading via the blood.
The mass produced product also contains bacterial DNA giving long term problems. It may be responsible for the "turbo-cancer". After a year the injections can still cause severe problems.
Long article here: The experimental injections are not safe and not effective
Besides the Lab Leak, there are some interesting additions.
The WHO is bad. Social distancing, Masks and Lockdowns are do not work. Protocols killed people.
Countries like Sweden did not have Masks, Lockdowns and social distancing, and had no problems at all. Yet the media tried to bend statistics, to make it seem as if Sweden was murdering people. This manipulation by the media was extreme and visible in many other countries as well. Who is really controlling the media? Certain journalists who pretended to be doctors or scientists, were identified as working for the Gates foundation. But in countries like Israel and the UK the media was controlled by the military, with military style propaganda (brainwashing).
There should be some more additions related to science:
The high number of "Covid cases" and "deaths from Covid", were caused by false positive tests and covid bonus money. Deaths from anything (incl. car accidents) with a positive Covid test were seen as a covid death. The PCR tests were badly calibrated and used >=30 cycle counts (even 40 to 60 in UK). It gives 99% false positives.
HCQ +Z, Ivermectin and Vitamin-D worked well as early treatment. Doctors using them, saved 99% of their patients.
Not using the standard protocols against lung infections caused deaths. Virus infections often combine with bacterial infections, and anti-biotics should be used.
The ventilators and remdesivir were useless and caused deaths. Doctors came out to advise oxygen over ventilators. And remdesivir was Fauci's killer medicine causing kidney failures.
Early reports showed that the virus was not very dangerous at all. South Korea reported a death-rate similar to flu. A cruise boat (with lots of old people) reported only a few deaths.
But the alarm was raised when deaths came in a few hospitals where very old people were treated (like in Italy Bergamot). They likely followed the WHO protocols. So they stopped using antibiotics and used ventilators.
Viruses spread very rapidly and were likely in every country within a week. (I got it jan 2020, from someone who was very sick in dec 2019). So any measures after nov 2019 were just for the show. People that had a lot of exposure (like Nurses) were quickly immune. That is because asymptomatic people (with low viral load) spread a low number of viruses so other people can build natural immunity. This was confirmed in population research in Ireland.
We know that Ivermectin and Vitamin-D can help against cancers. And how certain diets can help against cancers.
See https://imahealth.org/research/cancer-care/
But those solutions are almost free..
I think Europe will be unable to pick up the war. Or even continue the support. France and England can threat with nukes.. for now.
Europe has invested everything in the Green revolution and immigration. All industry is reduced in production without any future nor energy. And even the farmers are getting cut.
They do not have any money, nor any meaningful army. Not even a single language. Instead they may have a famine and more crime from immigration.
The EU politicians have lots of unrealistic plans, and will push them forward until those plans fail.
But it could be part of their absurd plan. They are still planning the great reset, and for that to succeed, all money most become worthless. This will create an opportunity for social credit based currency. The communism in China is seen as an example.
It is a sad situation that could easily have been avoided. :-(
Here is an overview that I learned from independent war journalists. Like Garland Nixon, and Scott Ritter.
The war has now just over 1 million registered military casualties on Ukraine side. (according to registered kills, so could be a lot more). And Russia about 80 thousand. (according to money given to families and such).
The difference is due to strategy differences. Ukraine soldiers were sent into the mine-fields under artillery fire. Not the best strategy. Large armies can not be formed with modern surveillance and modern rockets / drones (on both sides). But for more funding, Zelenski needed to show the west that they could conquer an area. Most of those funds get lost in the corruption. Those "conquered areas" were turned into artillery traps, following the Russian defense doctrine. The NATO training is focused on tactical operations to capture strategic targets quickly, but lack in strategic planning.
The army also changed. First there were some well trained troops. Now many on the front are involuntary. as they are picked off the street.
The core of the army does not even go into fighting, as they are just their to shoot people that try to flee the battle field. Most of them seem to be the neo-nazis following Bandera's WW2 strategy.
There are also NATO soldiers staying in the back. They operate the complex rockets and air-defense systems. As they require years of training, and access to secret codes.
So let us not forget how the left is the main cause of the massive rape problem. They were even attacking women who did not want to be raped. (video of protest vs antifa).
The massive rape (and murder) crime was already reported many times by Tommy Robinson.
Seven years ago Millions of rapes
But the government and justice and police tried to cover it up, some were even involved in raping, and that got him in trouble.
And he was put into prison for trying to expose this, and attacked by left extremists. While he may be a controversial figure (he regards all Islam as extremist), the left has been spreading various fake news around him. I suspect that the UK intelligence also works against him.
Documentary:
The Phantom Rape Gang - Tommy Robinson
It is always "disinfo" when Urkaine has been doing warcrimes. Also the US (often CIA) and Israel perform warcrimes, while it is censored as "disinfo".
Just check out how the civilians in Crimea and Donbas are continuous under attack by Ukraine artillery and drones. If we would believe Ukraine they are their own civilians.
There are no "good guys" in a war. It is always a lesser evil.
The Ukraine/NATO drones were attacking Kazakhstan during the accident. Probably because Kazakhstan had held a Bricks meeting. The goal is to make life difficult for those who support Bricks or Russia.
The western media is subject to propaganda from the North Atlantic Counsel (also active in reddit). So they create narratives to make Ukraine seem like a saint. While Ukraine (Nazi) intelligence murders people with different opinions.
While bringing down these drones, it seems that the shrapnel from an explosion hit the airplane. The pilots mentioned 2 explosions in the air (from traffic control). The airplane was still able to fly for a long distance. If it was a SAM-target it would have been easily destroyed in the air. Passenger airplanes are very easy targets.
Both the drones and the SAM might have carried frag-munitions that created the square holes. They may have caused the damage that was critical during the landing procedure.
There will be an investigation into what really happened, but it is already fully politicized.
wikipedia is hijacked by activists. Never true when it is political.
And a lot of science on it is also false.
The leftists and Ukraine propagandists have been hijacking these sites right from the start. And they make up lies for everything.
The Scott Ritter I talk about is involved in arms reduction during the cold war. He exposed that Iraq did not have "Weapons of Mass Destruction". Before the US invaded it (illegally). And was attacked by the neocons ever since.
How can we ever trust accusations from those sources. When these same people have been making up lies to attack Julian Assange.
They are following the same script as in Ukraine.
From Scott Ritter (who married a woman from Georgia), most people in Georgia already know that the EU/US want to abuse them. And this has been demonstrated openly in talks with the EU. They see how Ukraine people are used as cannonfodder (over 1 million dead), while they get a carrot-on-a-stick for EU /NATO acceptance.
The problem is that a lot of money is brought in to pay for actors and assassins. But because the Georgians know the enemy, they are ready to oppose a possible revolution.
That fake 88 billion is a confession of the DNC of how many illegal immigrants have been dragged in. The immigrants were paid money to get in. The total damage and cost is exceeding that fake number by far.
And the border security was completely broken. The restoration of basic border security is a military task. The 1 trillion that is now spend on foreign wars in corrupt countries can radically be reduced.
I do need some feedback. Thanks.
I wanted to make a 3D animation to explain this part better.
The wine-glass analogy is indeed confusing.
Below I will try to explain resonance of light and the electron-shell. And compare this to the Photon-model. I hope this will be clearer.
In atomic theories, the electrons of atoms are modeled as rings (Bohr) or as clouds or as probability waves (Quantum Mechanics).
In atomic scanning experiments we see either (1) spheres or (2) almost empty space. I picked the sphere model without good explanation.
In the photo-electric effect the light-wave is very large compared to the atom. The electron-shell causes a dielectric effect. This means that the center of the electric charge of the atom shifts up and down. This resonates with the light. It is why a prism can give us the light-spectrum
Explained by 3blue1brown
What happens at the exact resonance frequency? - The electrons start to move to a different orbit (or different electron-shell).
Depending on the circumstances, these electrons can then move away from the atom, or from the surface of a material.
With gas atoms we can calculate and observe the electron-bands that relate to certain frequencies. This gives the emission spectrum bands.
With solid materials you can get a wide range of resonance frequencies. So if light is causing the release of an electron, the additional energy can also add kinetic energy to this electron.
So the photo-electric effect is just resonance. And it works differently if you have a solid or a gas.
Roughly described, Einstein's model of the photo-electric effect is more like light-bullets that shoot electron-particles out of orbit.
The spectral lines of gas show how this model fails. The gas only reacts to the certain frequencies of the light, and higher frequencies simply pass through.
According to the Einstein the higher frequencies should give more kinetic energy to the atoms. Which is not true in gas.
Light also transfers momentum via dielectric reactions, not via "photons". Explained in this video Why light has momentum even without mass?. Which is why light can also be used to hold small objects in space. example
Don't worry about your lack of knowledge. Knowledge without intelligence is not very useful. And many modern scientists are lacking intelligence and critical thinking.
I think you refer to:
No Black Holes Exist, Says Stephen Hawking—At Least Not Like We Think - Black holes do not have "event horizons" beyond which there is no return, according to renowned physicist.
I think he is just bending the black-hole theory. From his theory, the quantum mechanics can cause stuff to escape a black-hole. The astronomers need that theory, because a lot of stuff escapes from "black-holes". We see very powerful plasma beams, like this one
I think that every part of the black-hole theory is broken. All black-hole images are just simulations and art. It is just a belief that they exist. And this belief blocks scientists from studying what is really going on.
I have written articles that debunk:
1- the "photo electric effect" , for which Einstein got the Nobel prize.
2- black holes . For which Hawking got the Nobel prize.
I am still looking for honest replies that can show even a doubt in my debunking. But just based on observations and basic physics and logic, both Einstein and Hawking are now in the Bullshit category.
I noticed that especially with astronomy. They make up invisible things whenever they need to. Just to keep the ancient hypotheses alive.
There is also a bias towards hype-subjects. As long they are in line with the beliefs of the peers. When someone discovers "something new" with hardly any evidence, it gets so much hype that they promote it as "the best thing ever". Like: AI and Crisper (DNA manipulation).
I notice that a lot of new videos (on youtube) have an AI voice-over with AI written text.
They AI-text seems interesting, but the text has almost no actual information. A lot of it is just to fill up the time of the video.
Due to Youtube's algorithm, a longer video gives more income. So the creators just artificially lengthen the videos to get more money.
The prompt that they give to the AI is probably the actual information in a few lines, which the AI translates to a story of 15 minutes. I suspect that some AI also adds stock-footage to the video as filler.