Best Pride Month so far, perhaps. The truly best one ever will be the one June where SCOTUS overturns Obergefell v. Hodges, and also rules any law to mandate gay marriage on the federal level unconstitutional.
I don't doubt they will try. But in this case, the right needs to copy the left's notes on the dismantlement of segregation: close every loophole and cut off every avenue of retreat the segregationists tried to fall back to in follow-up cases over the next decades - can't literally have black & white schools so you want to go to legally desegregated but de facto still white/black schools? Fuck that, the courts say that you will have diversity bused into your schools and if you don't like it, they'll sic the pigs on your protesting ass no matter whether you're a student or a parent. Don't want to hire diversity but you can't say so outright anymore so you just try to do it unreported? The same courts will mandate hiring quotas and if you refuse to abide, you'll get sued into oblivion and make the diversity richer than they would've been if you just gave them the job.
Indeed this is only the beginning. If there is to be true and consistent justice the right must look at everything the left did to drag the nation, indeed the West, to where it is today and figure out ways to get back at them through similar avenues, most certainly including retaking and then making use of the institutions which have proven to be such effective weapons in the race war, war on religion, and every other social war of the last century. They must fashion from the Bard's most accurate depiction of a Jew ever their new watch-words for the next 1000 years: "The villainy you teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction."
My understanding is that they admitted it was in the past affirmative action cases. It's just that they first ruled it was actually OK because diversity was a 'compelling state interest' (Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1974 - the specific affirmative action program being challenged there was found to be too obviously racist, but otherwise AA was upheld) and then secondly that while it was racist, it was the just and necessary kind of racism that needed to go on for some more time as basically an additional form of reparations to the 'historically disadvantaged' sort of diverse vibrancy (Grutter v. Bollinger, 2003 - the writer of the majority opinion, Sandra Day O'Connor, opined that AA should go on for another 25 years or so).
Yeah, man was so totally not a Christian that he adamantly supported Franco's (zealously Catholic, often crusader-themed) Nationalists whose ranks also included the even more fanatically ultra-Catholic, feudalist Carlist faction in the Spanish Civil War...
Don't forget all that 'die cis scum' messaging put out by these clowns. The troon brigade absolutely intends these terms to be used as slurs against normal people too, often accompanied by violent fantasizing.
Ah yes, that's how we can tell a 'fact' is utterly unimpeachable as to be self-evident. When it's illegal to question it.
Anglicanism was founded as a tool of the state, nothing more, nothing less. That they've gone from nodding along with the king's demands to seize monastic lands for his own profit & to sanction a divorce every time his queen fails to pump out a male heir, to sanctioning all sorts of modern paganism and the Satanic self-worship & degeneracy we call 'LGBTQ+ pride', should be no surprise. They were never supposed to have the balls to stand up to secular authority & secular trends to begin with, indeed the Acts of Supremacy make it abundantly clear that the CoE has no job except to suck off (or lick) its royal Supreme Governor and enthrall the minds and hearts of his/her subjects to their service forever. The same is true of the other Protestant state/mainstream churches, which is why they all suck and why the only Protestants who even still resemble Christians are the independent/'non-denominational'/Evangelical sorts these days.
It should tell you something that pretty much all the great thinkers of Anglicanism were either those with strong Catholic sympathies (the 'Anglo-Catholic' faction, many of whom are just straight up becoming Catholics now) or those with strong anti-state inclinations (many of whom expressed great sympathy with, or eventually just outright became, Puritans and other 'nonconformists').
The Anglican Church is unsalvageable and doomed to perish, as any church built on foundations as shaky as its own are, and the so-called 'conservatives' in its camp are about as effective as conserving the traditions (which the church's founder Henry VIII rejected) as modern neocons are at conserving theirs. Anyone with sense still in its ranks are outright becoming either Catholics or some other sort of Protestant depending on their personal sensibilities, same as the above philosophers.
You want an example of a state church that was actually cool in even the slightest regard, you basically have to look back to late Roman/Byzantine times. At least that church still burned heretics, had strength enough to drive Emperors to their knees and make them beg for forgiveness after committing great evil (the most famous example being Saint Ambrose excommunicating Theodosius I for having barbarian mercenaries put down a riot in Thessalonica by massacring the Roman citizenry) and donated its riches to help the Empire fight off the Sassanid Persians & Muslims.
I cannot think of a more contemptible creature which slithers on God's green earth than the average liberal cuck/cuckquean. At least worms and maggots can actually serve a purpose in nature; Muslims have a few consistent beliefs and are willing to kill and die for them; and even George Soros and the other architects of the current miserable state of the world have a brain, utterly warped and directed toward malevolent purposes though it may be, between their ears.
This Majewski and so, so many other braindead progs exhibits a perfect storm of indescribable arrogance, entitlement, ignorance (willful or otherwise), short-sightedness, sadism toward their enemies and utter spinelessness in the face of actual resistance from those who might object to their agendas. Especially if it's a minority who they assume they have in their pocket by default, double especially when it's the people they brought in the first place to stick it to the Straight White Christian Patriarchy™ and to serve as a permanently reliable voting bloc which will totally never go against them ever.
They manage to be both so vile and so mindbogglingly retarded that I couldn't write this shit in any one of my stories without getting accused of making up an unrealistic strawman villain that totally would never exist IRL!
The only remotely sensible thing ever said by anarcho-Communists was that 'liberals get the bullet too' line.
Nah, people engaging in nigger behavior are awful regardless of skin color. I like Thomas Sowell but have no love for white trash who act like niggers and guess what, neither did historical lynch mobs. Even Wikipedo has to admit that of the over 4,000 lynchings known to have occurred in American history, 1/4 of the people lynched were whites. One of the more notable incidents was one of a (white) bandit getting lynched in Arizona, for example. It just so happens, you know, one race is much more prone to niggery than the other - so of course they'd be punished at a disproportionate rate for it too, back when doing so wouldn't get an army of glowies to Waco your town.
Maybe next time you should try doing some research instead of chimping out at the first sight of le mean doodoo words like some braindead gangbanger who just got called a nigger by whitey, you stupid fucking nigger.
How quickly did society go from disapproving of gay marriage in polls to approving?
If we give polling the benefit of the doubt and assume that wasn't bullshit, then do you think it's possible to reverse the tide in a similar timeframe?
As someone who lives in a red leaning suburb in Texas, the reality is that even plenty of Republicans here actually support same sex marriage.
Scott Presler is our biggest voter registration guy in the GOP and he is gay.
Richard Grenell is gay and he is a major Trump surrogate.
The GOP has more gays in it than you think.
We are not living in the pre-Trump era GOP where opposition to same sex in the party was universal.
Trump was openly for same sex marriage.
Is this supposed to impress me or something? 'cause listing all this shit out is accomplishing is just making me agree with that other guy who said that you're making a great case for ensuring the Republicans only ever lose from now on, at least until the socially liberal element have been expelled or forced back in line.
Every day, something happens to further convince me that Bull Connor was the good guy all along and that perhaps lynching niggers every now and then to intimidate the rest into staying on their knees is just a habit of healthy societies.
Oh yeah, that and also, Pinochet and Franco were way too fucking soft. Suharto's the guy who was right about commies.
Truly feminism was the greatest shit-test ever issued to mankind in history.
Of course. If it doesn't 'validate their existence' (puff up their ego), it's evil, homophobic, bigoted, literally Hitleresque, etc. The trannies' entitlement complex didn't come out of nowhere, in many regards it's a copy of their precursors' mentality (just taken to even more unbearable heights). Just like the trannies, the LGs could never accept nothing less than being perpetually celebrated and adored by the 'breeders' they hold in such contempt: 'just live and let live' was always a lie for the majority of the gay rights movement.
Incidentally this is a big reason as to why I do not believe it is useful to distinguish the LG from the T, in the end. Evil and disorder are evil and disorder, be they lesser or greater. Groups like Gays Against Groomers (weak and despised by their own aisle they might be) might serve a purpose as a tactical tool in the here & now, but when you are done with a tool, you put it away - in this case, back in the closet for the good of everyone else. (Before you feel too bad about this stance, I guarantee that they feel the exact same way about the right side of the aisle: I've seen more than a few posts by disenchanted liberals in right-wing spaces claiming they need to stop being dinosaurs and become 90s-early 2000s Democrats to 'keep up with the times', and that the right wing should only ever go back to the halcyon days of 2010-15.)
Certainly that's the case now, in spite of what leftist propaganda might say, not even the most overtly theocratic Evangelical from the 80s would approve of chucking gays off the nearest rooftop simply for being gay. Hell, contrary to leftist propaganda, Uganda doesn't do that either.
On the flipside, medieval & Early Modern Christians prescribed burning at the stake as the punishment for sodomy. IIRC that's where the origin of 'faggot' (a 'bundle of sticks' = kindling after all) as an insult comes from. The conservative backlash against post-60s degeneracy is only starting to get going: with luck I'll live long enough to witness 'Make Faggots Flammable Again' dethrone 'Love Is Love' as the popular motto of the age.
The Armenians aren't even Muslim, but rather Muslims' victims. They got genocided by the Turks back before and during WW1 and those same Turks' descendants, as well as their Azeri cousins, have busily been trying to finish the job since the collapse of the Soviet Union. I wouldn't consider them 'barbarians' and by definition they aren't Third World ('Second World', ie. ex-Soviet, at worst since Armenia was an SSR).
The loathsome Kardashian clan aside, I will say it's nice to see that at least the Armenian Apostolic Christians haven't lost their balls entirely and are still willing to stand up to Globohomo in one of its greatest centers of power. Surviving real, savage persecution by both the Muslim Turks and atheist Soviets must've helped with that.
Let us never forget that the specific gaggle of Injuns to hold the Black Hills area where Mt. Rushmore is located, the Lakota, ruled it for less time than the USA has - 100 years, from 1776 to 1876 when they were defeated in the Great Sioux War, whereas the Americans of course have held it for the 147 years since.
Also the Lakota didn't just walk in there and settle it peacefully, they wrested the Black Hills from the people already living there like the Crow - many of whom then went on to enlist with the Americans as 'Indian Scouts'. But nobody wants to talk about those guys for the same reason that they don't want to talk about the Tlaxcalans and all the other native allies who helped the Spanish destroy their common Aztec enemy.
This was rare when Pride was about tolerance, understanding, & getting along. Even social conservatives, including Christian & Islamic faith communities, appreciate those values.
That was their mistake. God willing, those 'social conservatives' realizing how much of an error the doctrine of 'live and let live' was and taking steps to the contrary will firstly escalate past boycotts, and secondly spill over the American border.
Depends on the parents' race & religion I'll bet. If they're white Christians, I give them a week tops, but the cops will probably come for them a lot sooner than that. If they happen to be vibrant and diverse Mohammedans however, then never, as not only is that Islamophobic but the Saracen crowd tend to respond rather explosively when Globohomo insists upon itself in their sight, and knowledge of this truth has installed a healthy fear of Allah in the hearts of progs.
Careful now Elon, lest you break your neck from all that back-and-forth whiplash.
In fact, there won’t be an official Pride Month celebration in St. Cloud this year at all. A festival scheduled for June 10 was canceled last month by its primary organizer, who cited a “climate of fear” and hostility toward LGBTQ people in a post on Facebook.
Good. Evil degenerates SHOULD live in constant terror for their lives. I dream, I hope, I pray that the alphabet soup genocide these fucks whine is always around the corner actually gets rolling someday soon. Letting the freaks out of the closet was society's first mistake, as we've seen if you give wickedness an inch and soon they'll have crossed the mile to castrating and raping your children.
In good time, I hope. But clearly Western Christians are very far from that point still, having only just begun to wake up to and fight back against the extent of the post-1960 cultural revolution.
Still I'll take 'taking the mic away and forcing the mincing queer to leave' over 'doing absolutely nothing because that'd be oh so unkind & disrespectful' the same way I'll take boycotting Anheuser-Busch and Target over thoughtlessly consooming products pushed by people who hate your guts, even if I would prefer 'cleansing San Francisco the way the crusaders did Jerusalem in 1099' and 'razing the Castro & Greenwich Village and salting their ruins'. Here's just hoping I live long enough to see Christians get that angry again.
'Swarthy' I believe was Tolkien's preferred term. With the possible exception of the Slavic-sounding Variags of Khand, the Easterlings were intended to be Middle-earth's equivalent to the Asiatic nomad hordes which periodically invaded Europe - Huns, Avars, Turks, Mongols, etc. - so 'swarthy' would seem about right for all but the northernmost of their kind. Compare, for example, modern Turkmens (not Southeast Asian dark or Abo black, but not exactly as snow-pale as the Chinese/Japanese/Korean ideal of beauty either) to fanart of Easterlings from the books.
It's the Far Haradrim who Tolkien intended to be the LOTR equivalent to truly black, sub-Saharan Africans. (The Near Haradrim, the sort who were more heavily represented in Sauron's armies and who fielded those Oliphaunts at the Pelennor Fields, weren't generally described as black but also 'swarthy' and approximated to the Arabs - Middle Easterners and North Africans, of course, are as a rule not 'black' either.)
Unironically what it's probably going to take and what may well happen. No matter what they and their simps say, the vast majority of women will fall in line when pushed into it by truly strong and authoritative men, and in fact the louder they bitch about being stronk independent girlbosses who don't need no man, the more likely they are to secretly crave male domination or straight up have rape fantasies.
Twilight & 50 Shades were mega-hits despite our age being one where feminism had been ascendant for almost a century with no significant reverses. Hell, history shows as much: during the Spanish Civil War the Nationalists had a habit of stripping anarchist milicianas and making them drink castor oil so they'd have to crawl around naked & shit themselves in public, and yet those supposed revolutionary girlbosses didn't choose to fight to the death or go to a mass grave (as plenty of Republican men did) to avoid such indignity. Most just bowed to Franco's regime and became meek tradwives or at least inoffensive spinsters in the decades which followed!
I do believe that once a critical mass of conservative young men come of age and decide to tear the incumbent rotten system asunder, the women will roll out the welcome mat for them. They're gonna give as much of a shit about any soy elemental simp claiming to fight for said system and their supposed rights as those milicianas did about their menfolk or, indeed, the pre-Indo-European matriarchs did when the Indo-Europeans rolled in at the start of the Bronze Age (hence the often-radical changes in European genetics from the latter's invasion onward, they routinely killed the pre-Indo-European men and took the women, and also passed property & titles down strictly patrilineally) - none at all.
There's truly nothing new under the Sun, the Japanese New Left of the 1960s was no less batshit insane than their Western counterparts, complete with their own SDS and such, and it was a miracle that their equivalent to the Weathermen ended up mostly killing themselves off & getting embarrassingly crushed by the cops rather than living to infect the education system like the American original did. Unfortunately as can be seen, they were a symptom and not the cause, the same mind virus germinating in the US just regrew its Japanese tentacle once it became strong enough to do so.
BTW, you know how a key facet of modern intersectional ideology contends that the US is an inherently (the left might say 'ontologically') evil construct founded on slavery and authoritarian impulses which should be destroyed at all costs, and that the very concept of 'whiteness' is tied to this evil and thus must also be deconstructed and extirpated if the great paradise of diverse empathy or whatever-the-fuck is to be realized? The Jap left was into that sort of shit before it was cool, too.