That has been one of my fears. That these injections were simply test runs (the largest testing population ever for a drug). I think they failed though in terms of actually delivering the drug because I don't think that they have been properly stored or manufactured (require very cold conditions and very specific manufacturing capabilities).

It is a gas necessary for life on earth.

The cliques didn't have any foundation to stand on.

Stop buying from them.

Slytherin was not inherently evil. Slytherin is not demonic and totalitarian.

You mean Andrew Breitbart's very suspicious death.

And have their boys circumcised if they do live.

And now sometimes have their boy's penis chopped off by a "doctor."

Are women by nature the most pro-war since they are not directly involved in conflict?

This reminds me a lot of Hillary Clinton.

Football is gay and female.

Edit: I was referencing this image: https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.be3f39665c2b2388725eabf3eca7ab6a?rik=%2f4kkc2IdBQ3ZMg&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

Training exercise. Very dangerous, very evil training exercise. That has been my thought for a long time.

That is why the psy-ops were so strong and were military-grade.

Thank you for correcting me. I didn't know what the default rate was, and I didn't how many loans were never repaid (i.e. default by death).

Yes, this is that one. I have no idea how this technology is going to work properly. I don't think anyone does. This is the shooting in the dark version of science (which is incredible in the worst possible way).

I don't think the executive has the unilateral authority to do this. Congress has to sign off on this as far as I know. Hasn't stopped this administration thus far though.

The first thing that I think of is corona-insanity when I think of safety culture unfortunately. There are legitimate reasons to prevent workplace injuries and deaths through the use of proper engineering controls, workplace management, PPE, and general awareness. This is actually useful. I would prefer OSHA and MSHA not existing, and this be done at a state-level though.

I just don't want anything to do with the plastic barriers at stores, useless and dangerous face masks, testing kits, or injections as safety items. They aren't preventing deaths and can't prevent deaths. They are just dangerous scams and have caused so much unnecessary suffering.

I think worksite helmets are overused by some bosses. I am not saying they are a bad invention, just overused and probably overcited by OSHA.

The etymology of safety is interesting from etymonline:

https://www.etymonline.com/word/safety

Maybe security or secure should be used instead of safe. Stay secure versus stay safe. I like the word secure (thinking how one would secure oneself when climbing a mountain)

Do you take issue with phrases like "Safe travels" or giving someone "safe passage?" I feel these terms may be less cowardly than "Stay safe," and they may be older as well.

I didn't invent it for what that is worth. The word has been used for a while.

Off the top of my head, OSHA started in the 1970's with Nixon (safety culture from that), and hard hats were first used for the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge as far as I know (I think in the 1930's or 1940's).

So, safetyism has been here for a bit now. Think about all the children wearing helmets while riding a bicycle rather slowly. Children didn't wear helmets in the past.

Think about how often you hear the phrase "Safety First" as opposed to "Break a Leg." Think about when you first heard the phrase "Safety First."

Safetyism is a feminine cancer in the west. Safetyism and its followers are part of the reason the COVID-fiasco happened.

Don't submit to loyalty oaths. You may be fired anyway. Stand firm to virtue.

I think I am confused by the common definition of self-sufficiency as "able to supply one's or its own needs without external assistance." "Without external assistance" implies to me isolated independence inherently (unless external means outside of one's community rather outside of oneself).

"If we were left alone today only to be pestered once a year for literal wheat by a tax man, society "as we know it" would collapse into base social traditions and expectations."

I would love nothing more than a collapse or reformation to good values. I think it is inevitable. It is simply a matter of debating the number of generations it will take. I want virtue back, and I strive for that.

I think the term is a misnomer as Indipendepede stated. I am trying to understand a man's definition of self-sufficiency.

I know this is an extreme view, but you are never financially independent if you are reliant on a currency that could be hyper-inflated (and no this is not advocating for crypto currency, I have my own issues with that).

Taken from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/self-sufficient:

"able to supply one's or its own needs without external assistance."

Perhaps, I am being pedantic, but I define "needs" as food, water, and shelter and "external assistance" as any help to obtain these items from any other source other than oneself. Maybe the term independent (as much as one can be) is better than the term self-sufficient. I don't think self-sufficiency exists, or the term simply doesn't sound right to me.

Electric (battery) truck is one of the dumbest things of this era.

I think that it will be very difficult to build these bridges. The out-group (not vaccinated) are willing to talk to the true believers, but the true believers are not willing to listen to reason. They have been brainwashed by the media.

Good for Nickmercs and everyone involved in that separate event. Parallel events for the non-crazies is the way to go going forward.