Not only fake empathy, but also selective empathy.
Extremely empathetic towards the in-group, and completely unempathetic towards the out-group.
Fake only in the sense that they are empathetic to the in-group no matter what, based on delusions. So it's not real empathy (how the other feels) but deranged empathy (how the made up other feels under these made up conditions).
The contrast is feeling empathy as a blanket, covering everyone, with higher intensity the closer you get to the center.
I think it's connected to neurotisism. The more anxiety, the more selective the empaty. Leftists are naturally high on neurotisism, but right leaning folks aren't immune to anxiety and when the conditions are met they too become selective.
Personality traits neuroticism (groupthink / NPC behavior) and agreeableness (irrationality / delusion).
Arguably you won the silver in the semi final match. And then you lost the gold in the final.
Accelerationism is the only strategy with any real chance of success.
Stuff like this should be celebrated.
They also tend to adopt a more masculine personality
You mean in contrast to their petite physiques and feminine facial features?
The left hates Israel more than any nation besides America.
I'm out of the loop on this one. What happened?
The PMC aren't low IQ, they're midwits in the 105-115 IQ range.
Smart enough to grasp concepts of causal relations, interconnected systems, and a myriad of correlations, but not smart enough to intuit system complexity, consider chaos theory, understand game theory, or to see very deeply into any problem. Knowing a little bit about something they are comfortable having opinions about it, because they lack the imagination to understand the immensity of what they don't know.
Socially they go through their formative years as opinionated among peers who never challeng them, because no teenager has a holistic view of anything. This errodes in them over time any sense of humility, and continuing in midwit fields surrounded by other midwits they never grow out of this sense that they have the answers to everything. It's never a very exact answer, if you press them, but always ends in some argument to authority, from an authority that's either also a midwit, or from some data they have completely misrepresented or misunderstood.
They alse tend to reduce everything to 2 dimentions (y is because of x), or 3 dimentions (if we do x right now then we will achieve y), while those smarter are mostly concerned with how systems work in motion, e.g. not "how do we achieve x", but how do we design a system that consistently produces results that trend the closest towards x.
My theory is that; 1) people above and below this midwit-range have more in common with eachother than either have to midwits. And 2) midwits have a lot in common with those who are low IQ (below the 90s).
(1)
People from about 90ish to 105ish are generally not coming up with grand theories of everything and are happy to admit that they don't know. They tend to be concerned with their lives, and have a commonsensic view of things.
People above are also not interested in such theories because they intuitively know that they don't know. They tend to be concerned with their professions or academic fields. Both groups engage with politics only enough to be left alone. This alliance does all the important work and create all the innovation.
(2)
The ones in the midwit range are convinced that they know what they're seeing in the metaphorical fog. Feeling the fog, and feeling that they need to make sense of it, causes anxiety. They study other midwits and build upon their midwittery. And they become obesessed with these grand narratives they're working on in tandem. This conviction makes them want to impose their reality upon everyone else as any opposition or critisism causes mental dissonance. They are natural activists. Their sense of rightousness trains them into becoming propagandists and manipulators. They are natural groupthinkers because their map of meaning consists of the opinions of others, where everything is intertextual and reality is subjective.
The low-IQ see even the everyday life of family, work and entertainment, and the simple systems in place to facilitate the everyday world, as part of the fog, which must be terrifying as in a fog everything is chaotic and complex and hard to grasp and thus frightening and a potential threat. As such they are very quick to take to theories that give meaning to the chaos they experience. Historically that's been religion, but more recently critical theories and thier favorite 'ism' has become a one answer explanation for everything.
This creates an alliance where the midwits knit togeher the framework that the stupes use to justify their actions and situations brought about by their inability to delay gratification and to plan for the future.
The groups intuitively understand each other. The first alliance is united by common sense and positivity born out of their "chop wood carry water" mentality, and a desire to be left alone to enjoy their life. They're ok with uncertainty and therefore they reject grand theories.
The second alliance is united by an underlying constant sense of fear, anxiety, and confusion. They are not ok with uncertainty, becuse more uncertaintly means more anxiety, and they are already at dysfunctional levels of anxiety. Therefore they retreat into delusions. The anxiety also compells them to force everyone to share their grand theories, because any challenge to the delusion is experienced as more anxiety.
Gain of function, if that's what you're refferring to, is incredibly stupid but it's disingenous to claim they were producing bioweapons.
I don't know much about this, but are they on testosterone for the rest of their lives?
And do the positive effects wear down over time?
The only thing that's holding them back is this evil spell cast by whites that gives them all the power and keeps the rest in misery.
If only you get rid of whites or break their spirit the /violin music/ POC will bloom and free from the shackles of oppression they will all become competent and effectice and suddenly without the white supremacist glasses on everyone will realize that black women are the most beautiful and all the POC will hold hands and they will dance on the streets in big diverse block parties and eat tacos and drink nigerian sodas and everyone will finally be able to finally breethe with relief now that all aggression and hatred has been irradicated with the evil whites and everyone will love and have sex with every gender in nature and Greta will become President of Earth and heal us and humans will live in harmony and there will forever be peace and there will be no more violence because violence isn't at all linked to IQ and even if it was it wouldn't matter because everyones IQ is super high now that the evil whites aren't there to be evil anymore <3<3<3
To keep, or to dismantle the Ukrainian response?
I would think they would want a buffer zone to the EU, and consolidate with only parts of Ukraine.
We'll see I guess.
I still believe that they will not attack NATO, that would start a major war.
Russia will grab eastern Ukraine and consolidate.
There's not going to be a war between the US and Russia.
Unless Russia threatens a NATO country.
Therefore, there's also not going to be a war between Russia and any NATO country. If you're in Poland you can relax.
I wasn't the person you were talking to.
Just pick up a newspaper. Yeah there's no direct "let's go to war", but you can't really say that, and that's not how propaganda works anymore.
What you'll find is a lot of attention on Ukraine, and a lot of rethoric which logical conclusion is that something should be done, or I sure hope someone somewhere does something.
But of course the washington post or nyt aren't writing these pieces about every conflict in the world. They've picked this one. And they won't let it go. There appears to be some sort of internal messaging saying that this conflict should be escalated. And the question is why. Why is this conflict useful to the cathedral? What is their endgame here? I agree they're not going to go to war against Russia, but they might want to spark a new cold war to justify grabbing new powers, for instance. Ramp up the rethoric to the brink of war, and keep people in the fear that it might happen any day now. And if we're going to war with Russia any day now and Russia backs Trump supporters, and Russia funds the alt-right, and Russia likes the Republicans, and Russia gave money to the truckers, etc. etc. etc. Well then you can imagine how a cold war could be useful in justifying going after your political opposition.
A lot of it is between the lines, which is possibly why a non-native speaker wouldn't pick up on it. And I'm not saying that's the end goal - but this is the kind of conversation people are aiming for when they ask; why is the left egging for war? They're not asking for some autist to repeat how there's not going to be a war!!1!11!!! Yeah, we know that. Calm down.
Also maybe if you ask people instead of telling them they won't percive you as being such a twat.
I don't really see anyone shilling for Putin.
I see a lot of people saying this is none of our business. They, and me, are still waiting for a comvincing argument about why the US should care about Russia invading Russian speaking parts of Ukraine.
I mean if it was a NATO country, I'd see the the argument that NATO needs to intervene, but it's not, so I'm curious what the reasoning is here.
What they're trying to tell you is that in the states a lot of leftists are egging for war, and the question is; why? What's their motivation?
If you calm down you'll see that you're going off on tangents.
Sexually they're attracted to whomever is atop the social hierarchy, or is physically attractive by a very narrow definition. They are all lusting over the same 20%.
All of them. And yes they'll all settle with some schmuck, but he's never going to satisfy her desire.
This means a fierce competition, from puberty until mid 20s, where they're all attracted to the same few guys.
Inversely, men's sexuality draws them towards a very wide selection of women. And most men have different preferences. There's only about 20% of women who no one would be completely happy to end up with, compared to the 80% of men.
Men can collaborate, because they can all win.
Women can't collaborate, because only a few of them can win, and the rest are to some degree dissatisfied.
It's why they can't get along with each other. The distaste for other women runs deep in their genes and is born from this competition. Environments where they are forced to work together fast become toxic.
They also can't be physically aggressive, so their aggression takes the form of ruining reputations, gossip, exclusion, etc.
Not to contradict you, just adding one more thought to your analysis, which I found very insightful.
Leftists believe they're not going to attack them if they grovel, kneel, and lick their feet.
And more often that not that's probably true. Why would you get rid of willing slaves?
They demonize every single person who dares oppose them in public. And it's so few, that even boring people like this get attention. Says something about how utterly dominant they are in the culture.
If the right knew how to win they'd be calling for more diversity in leftist professions.
More black journalists! I's brilliant. Not only will the clergy lose their jobs, but incompetence will crumble their institutions.
Everyone should be calliing for more black journalists from every rooftop. Put them under pressure to comply with their own demands.
So they'er smart enough to control the world, but they're too stupid to stop themselves from turnung the world into a disaster conflict zone?
Only a high IQ society can be safe and stable, so their master plan is to replace the high IQ poopulation in the same countries where they live?
Their big plan is to overthrow their docile, indoctrinated, domesticated, idiot NPC puppets and replace them with an angry, uncontrollable, low IQ horde who will turn society into a shithole and hunt them down at the first opportunity?
They will secure their own tiny homeland surrounded by enemies by undermining and destroying the one nation that's guaranteeing their safety?
This is such a fucking cult.
We're doomed unless normies start revolting against the branwashing.
Anything but a red blowout at the next few elections means it's too late.
Not that republicans will stop the madness, they're incompetent, but it's a signal that people are starting to have had enough.
Also if anyone is connected with anyone influential or with 4chan - get them to try to trend not watching the new LOTR show.
A billion dollars invested, there will never be a better moment to send a message.
That works accross platforms, but different accounts on the same platform are linked through IP. Just FYI.
How about people who didn't manage to invent the wheel?
Women score high on both those traits.
Personally I think jews is a misnomer. They're a minority group and like all minority groups they have an in-group preference, but this weird facination with jews is the right sabotaging itself.
It's almost as pointless as the imps feminism fetish.
The world is a complex network of interconnected butterfly effects, and no one is in control. If your analysis needs a bogeyman, then it's too simplistic.
The west is falling because mass immigration is dividing interests, driving down IQ averages, and making sure that hordes of people can't compete and have a grievance, coupled with an empire ideology that caters to the most neurotic by enshrining as cultural taboos any challenge to blank slate theory, and now the agrieved have a tool to attach their greivance to and use as a weapon. Add to that guilt and incredulity and suddenly all defenses are down. All of which likely came about as a consequence of our civilization turning matriarchal. Possibly an inevitability, possibly it's what's driven all empires to an end - the slow decline towards good times making weak men, and weak men becoming feminine and society turning from high risk / high reward, and focused on victory for the strong to low risk, collectivist, and focused on protection for the weak.
The origins of all of this is insecurity, greed, stupidity, guilt, reightousness, pride, not some cabal trying to disrupt the very societies they live in and control.