Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.
I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.
You responded to this comment...
Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.
With this...
"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."
I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842
Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.
Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.
If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?
Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:
- https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/lgbt-us-msa/
- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/sexuality/bulletins/sexualorientationenglandandwales/census2021
Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.
Do you understand?
EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...
Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.
You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities, and 11% is highly significant for women of marrying age.
Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey from PRRI showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.
Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.
The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.
It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.
I don't know how much more simply I can make it.
No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.
Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.
That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.
- Do...
- You...
- Understand?
According to what Tim Burton had planned, he was going to blackwash Two-Face by having Billy D(Dee?) Williams turn into Two-Face in the third film, which thankfully never got made.
Burton was also going to blackwash Robin by casting Marlon Wayans. I think Marlon talked a bit about this and Burton mentioned it somewhere? (I'm too arsed to find the links at this point)
Either way, the blackwashing of Batman was an inevitability.
It was meant to happen sooner in the 1990s, yet Warner Bros., (for better or for worse) canned Burton as director due to the backlash from Batman Returns (i.e., parents complained it was too "dark" and "sexual" for the little lads and lasses).
You can decide whether the pozzing of the Batman franchise happening 30 years ago or today is better or worse.
EDIT: Also, I have not seen The Batman and likely never will (though maybe if I'm bored enough I might, but I doubt it). Blackwashing Gordon (and likely Barbara), and niggerfying Catwoman were all a bridge too far. Plus, Pattison just did not exude enough masculinity to be considered or taken seriously as Batman.
It was a funny bit of trivia that Pattison was actually OLDER than Christian Bale when playing his year-one Batman, even though Bale came across as WAY more mature, intimidating and physically capable.
The study says the same thing as the article, not what you're saying
The study literally says...
Participants were women (N=123), ages 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact. Approximately 27% of women identified as exclusively heterosexual
That's literally what I said.
1 in 4 women who identify as straight said they still slept with other women in college, according to Marie Clarie.
The only person not taking the time to read and responding like an AI bot is the person collectively ignoring all the data to troll with anecdotes.
Most women may sleep around a lot, but few of them are attracted to other women so they only sleep around with men.
It doesn't matter what you think, or what they say they're attracted to. They will sleep around with whomever, whenever, if they feel like it. You literally have zero data for your position, just your feelings.
The point is that bisexual women are rare, contrary to propaganda about all or most women being bisexual.
No one said all or most women are bisexual. This is a strawman you keep bringing up because you cannot grasp how data works. Here's another stat that also aligns with all the other bits I posted:
It doesn't align with anything you're saying.
But it also doesn't mean these women are actually attracted much to women, it just means that they're whores who will experiment and sleep around. Heck, 8 - 11% of women aged 18 - 35 have OnlyFans, according to Aaron Clarey (and other recent data), and a lot of those whores will mess around with other slags, even IF they're dating men or marry a man (like those whores Lillian Phillips or Nala Rey).
That's mostly what the data is saying: women are whores, regardless of who they're attracted to.
It's why bisexuals do not have long-lasting same-sex relationships, and most end up with men (i.e., they're whores).
In fact, you would NEVER know a woman is bisexual unless she told you, I don't get the impresison you talk much to the lasses, though, since you have a hard time following basic logical threads (no offence, mate, but the fact I have to keep repeating myself and breaking down irrefutable data while you rely on anecdotes and your feelings says a lot).
I also am compelled to ask, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
I have folders, because I oftentimes encounter "centrists" or liberals who are always defending the faggot-filled lifestyle. So I have to quote the stats occasionally to let it be known that it's a sinful, disease-ridden life with no good end but a bad one.
Sometimes -- like in this thread -- I will have to sort through the links and do a bit of housekeeping. There were a few links I needed to refresh and update, so technically it was a good thing these fellas were skeptical because there was one particular link that I had forgotten to save and thought I had lost it for good some time ago, but thankfully I was able to find it again because of this thread.
A lot of people have a hard time reconciling that two things can be true at the same time.
It's always disappointing when people back some obvious bad actor because they said something "based"... once.
It's a companion piece to this study, showing that 27% of women who identified as exlcusively heterosexual still had same-sex relations:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5844220/
It also doesn't matter if you don't thikn it's true, today's femoid are slag-minded whores. Even the CDC had to reluctantly admit that the average bodycount for most wenches is between 5 - 8 during the college years, and that's being very conservative about it.
But that's completely beside the point...
The point -- as the other user pointed out, and as the studies irrefutably demonstrate -- is that bisexual women are disease-carrying whores, and, unfortunately there are plenty of simps out there who sleep with them.
You're actually correct, I posted the wrong links...
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2377304/
(for those who don't want to click the link here are the relevant bits):
Sexual behavior and sexual identity data indicated that 1.3% to 1.9% of the women were lesbians and 3.1% to 4.8% were bisexual. Self-reported viral STD rates were significantly higher among bisexual women (15.0% to 17.2%) than among lesbians (2.3% to 6.7%).
Just a follow up on the former: https://www.stdcheck.com/blog/lgbt-std-statistics/
Another link...
Relevant bits that corroborate the other links...
College women who reported having sex only with men during the past year had an average of two sex partners, as did those who reported having sex only with women. Women who reported sex partners of both genders during the past year had an average of five sex partners.
More useful info...
Lesbians were least likely to report having HPV/genital warts, while, compared with lesbians, heterosexual women had a fourfold increased risk, bisexual women had a sixfold increased risk, and those unsure of their sexual orientation had a fivefold increased risk.
Most relevant bit...
When all the STDs were taken together, lesbian women had the lowest risk of infection—a 62% decreased risk, compared with heterosexual women. Bisexual women were 60% more likely to have an STD than heterosexual women were. But, compared with lesbian women with their very low rate, bisexual women were four times more likely to have an STD.
Awesome. Thanks for this, mate.
It's not saying "lots of women are bisexual", it's saying a sizable percentage have been brainwashed into acting out their whoredom without a filter.
A while back there was a report that 25% of women who identify exclusively as heterosexual still experimented in college sleeping with other women for no other reason than because they wanted to see if it was pleasurable:
Again. that's data from over a decade ago -- before degeneracy went rampant post 2020.
85% of most bisexual women also had male partners (and this was more than 25 years ago):
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1874216/
And unfortunately men are more open to dating bisexual women:
https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/23915-LGBTQ-dating-bisexual-trans-poll-2019
Again, those are old numbers -- post OnlyFans boom, I can't imagine older millennials and younger zoomers who grew up on nothing but porn are going to be more reserved about who they sleep with if given the choice/chance.
All that is to say is that bisexual women sleep with bicurious women, bisexual/gay men, AND straight men. They have a higher than average annual partner count, and are the highest disease carrier group next to gay/bisexual men.
This is just to reaffirm the other poster's point that yes, there is a strong likelihood of it jumping the barrier depending on its prevalance in areas like London, California, Seattle, Amsterdam, New York, Atlanta or Portland, where a lot of bisexuals reside and where sex amongst those groups are more rampant.
Unfortunately they do. Bisexuals are the highest disease carriers next to gay men:
And a lot of degenerate men like sleeping with bisexual women because they foolishly think that they can get a threesome out of it:
(Keep in mind, those percentage growths all come from old data, it's risen drastically since then)
Worse yet, majority of these bisexual women go on to marry men, taking all of the diseases and infections from past hookups with them into their new relationships...
...and they still don't stop sleeping with other women even when they marry men...
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15299716.2011.620472
Can we get a link to the actual post? I really want to read those replies.
Nah, they throw bones to people who actually spend money by adding content people actually want to buy (which includes masculine blokes and hot wenches).
But all of their content is almost exclusively themed around Liberal Progressive views. They promote BLM, pride faggotry, women's day stuff -- all of that nonsense.
As others said, they had unskippable, uninterrable black fellating going on with a giant screen. I was pretty sure they also did some trans nonsense too.
But a company that occasionally throws you a bone while still promoting out-and-out-degeneracy absolutely is not resisting wokeness.
Jared Taylor is further being proven right with every passing event.
The combat and the atmosphere/setting of Stellar Blade 2 are all right up my alley. But I'm done playing as female protagonists for now.
Maybe in a few years my mind will change, but even with the excellent looking combat animations and the mouthwatering environments, I just don't feel like playing as a wench in my high-def games anymore.
This is true.
The problem is that they close down a legacy studio and then some new one pops up with "lead designer from popular franchise!" and it gets marketed like the next big thing under a new studio name pushing the same DEI slop.
I'll give you two examples: Exodus The Expanse
These two games are being propped up for the people working on them and their pedigree in the industry. Both games follow a similar formula and Exodus already shows all the usual signs of a DEI-infested game and they've only released bits of gameplay.
So it's the same thing under a different name. Money is changing hands from different players but the outcome still seems to be the same.
And that's not to mention that as old pubs like Ubisoft start folding in we have literal faggot-run media companies like Annapurna publishing games, movies and other media, all with a faggot-tint to them. So it's like a hydra -- cut off one head and two more appear.
I literally said this would happen in a thread of people saying she was "based".
I said, "When has a woman been elected into a leadership role that didn't cave to the sensibilities of the zeitgeist?" and the people supporting her just kind of waffled around the issue.
Now, day by day, it's becoming obvious that she's abusing the sentiment of "yorosukuonegaisimasu" to the extent of basically betraying her own kind for the Jewish overlords.
It's disturbing that they look like sisters.
I get that... but one is downstream the other.
The nerdom was only allowed to be usurped because Church & State were usurped.
Culture is downstream the sociopolitical zeitgeist, and when the long march through the institutions took place, nerdom was always going to fall.
Had the Church and Academia bulwarked their bastions, we likely wouldn't even need a KIA/KIA2.
There would be so much cheating going on; one scandal after another...
North Korea hiring a Japanese player to get the edge; South Korean players getting last-minute eye surgery for 20/10 visual acuity...
Yeah, I don't know what he's on about.
There is a schism in the religious community right now, about how many of the Occidental religions have been usurped by feminism.
It's not just a nerd thing.
What's dangerous about it is that it allows them to recapture skeptical normies.
We have our senses heightened for this thing -- we're looking out and attempting to avoid the propaganda so they don't wank one over on us. But the Critical Drinker types and his followers just want to consume something entertaining and not have to think about it. Those are the types who will fall to the subversion rather easily.
HIding and inserting the woke in the way they're doing it now is going to allow them to keep expanding and subverting. And then we end up with normies using lines like...
"But mate, it's a great game! It's the best since the last great game they made! Who cares if there are disabled trans-black lesbian jews in the game? So long as it's fun!"
The comments from faggots and tards attacking her is sickening.
There are some people in there defending her, thankfully.
There was another short-haired lesbian that was there on their team, but they purposely avoided showcasing her during the gameplay.
I was almost about to praise this game, too, because the seven minutes of gameplay didn't look bad. Even though there was nothing terribly new other than being able to low-wall cover and leap from objects, I figured, "at least it's masculine again....!"
Then I noticed that one of the four teammates was a blonde short-haired looking dyke, and my woke-radar started pinging.
Then I noticed there was an unskippable segment where Marcus gets downed and someone has to save him while he's being mauled. Then I noticed ANOTHER unskippable cutscene where Marcus is going one-on-one with a Locust and nothing he does is working and he's about to die, until the Maori, Tye, comes to save him.
This is a trend I noticed in movies and games with male leads: they're constantly being undermined and haivng to be saved by some DEI hire.
It was a constant them in the movie Predator: Badlands, the movie War Machine, and that 007 game. And in just seven short minutes Marcus had to be saved twice via unskippable cutscenes. I can only imagine what the rest of the game is like (well, judging by the clip of the dykemutt...I guess we can all figure it out).
Thanks for the reminder, because I was just about to ask, "Wasn't Schumacher also accused of being a pedophile?" and you went on confirmed it with the Wikipedia entry.