Hoax #5 in prior link. Compared to Christian or Roma persecutions, or to Trump actions against other nations, they are indeed rookie numbers.

Complete hoax.

1. James Wickstrom was jailed for a year for making up invalid titles for himself and others.

2. "Abraham 'Abe' Finkelstein" is unfindable. Wickstrom and his guest never elaborate beyond "Abe" having a synagogue somewhere in New York, which has zero independent evidence.

3. The guest agrees you could say he is lying, but that he always tells the truth even when he is lying.

4. The guest constantly fails Hebrew grammar in the same way Wickstrom does. He also fails history.

5. The photo of an unrelated professor, Kenneth Feinberg, was later inserted into this event to represent "Finkelstein", as this thumbnail shows.

It's 100% done for its entertainment and provocateur value.

The 109 lines of text (not countries) ultimately come from Grosser and Halperin 1979, which only resolves to 12 countries (Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine) and parts of 10 others (Algeria, America, Britain, Czechia, Egypt, Latvia, Morocco, Poland, Romania, Tunisia). Hoax #11.

You'd be surprised how many professing Nazis and whitists can't act realistic and human enough to hide the glow especially when called out.

EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES IS ABOUT CONTINGENCY. He may, he may not, he may have already. I don't think he will here, but the point is that the enemy doesn't know that.

I started saying this years ago. Those larping as stupid anti-Semites are probably Zionists creating more Zionism because a system's purpose is what it does.

And, funny thing, without exception, everyone I call out on this point refuses to abandon the stupidity larp and be reasonable.

"All Jews believe the Jesus pee tape!"

"That's not what the Talmud says and not what they believe."

"All Jews believe the Jesus poop tape!"

Dude, this is like the stupidest post, as if a school can be distinguished from a military base right next to it at that scale. You do see the diamond labeled "Iranian Air Defenses", right? You did count the civilians killed by the ayatollah in the last month, right?

Christians (America), Jews (Israel), and Muslims (Iran) are all being blamed for this event, but Trump has now gone on the record saying he's confident it was an Iranian failed launch, so I think he's likely to have data behind that claim.

There is no evidence of American deaths due to Kuwait crashes. All 6 pilots survived. We do have evidence of 4 American deaths in combat so far, but this was not tied to this incident.

Here are the first 10 hits at justice.gov/epstein. We can assume some mentions will be because of notoriety, like Trump's, but diggers might find more than just notoriety.

Showing 1 to 10 of 172 Results.

EFTA00930905.pdf - DataSet 9

The Economist What might Ayatollah Ali Khamenei be making of America's noisy Iran talk this week? Article 3....For Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, it's a double bind: If he offers on the nuclear program a deal that would be acceptable to the West, he risks undermining...The Economist What might Ayatollah Ali Khamenei be making of America's noisy Iran talk this week?

EFTA02021314.pdf - DataSet 10

The Economist What might Ayatollah Ali Khamenei be making of America's noisy Iran talk this week? Article 3....For Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, it's a double bind: If he offers on the nuclear program a deal that would be acceptable to the West, he risks undermining...The Economist What might Ayatollah Ali Khamenei be making of America's noisy Iran talk this EFTA_R1_00527018 EFTA02021318 week?

EFTA02723111.pdf - DataSet 11

Iranian sources speculate that the Guards have been pressuring Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to make a deal or get the sanctions eased by appearing to make...It is clear that Ali Khamenei, the "Supreme Guide" of the Khomeinist regime, lacks the qualifications to be marketed as a religious leader for Iraqi Shi'ites

EFTA01882596.pdf - DataSet 10

Iranian sources speculate that the Guards have been pressuring Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to make a deal or get the sanctions eased by appearing to make...It is clear that Ali Khamenei, the "Supreme Guide" of the Khomeinist regime, lacks the qualifications to be marketed as a religious leader for Iraqi Shi'ites

EFTA01073880.pdf - DataSet 9

This point was specifically mentioned by Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei in March 2011, when he chided Qaddafi for giving concessions to the West over...Last month, Ali Khamenei dropped a bombshell. He suggested that Iran might move from a presidential to a parliamentary system of government.

EFTA01953058.pdf - DataSet 10

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader who holds the ultimate authority in the Islamic Republic, and his aggrieved Revolutionary Guard are wary of...Events since the election have been particularly kind to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

EFTA01141247.pdf - DataSet 9

EFTA01141261 Last week Reuters published a three-part (six-months) investigation into the financial empire of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei...As a result Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei controls a business empire worth around $95 billion - a sum exceeding the value of his oil-rich

EFTA00935829.pdf - DataSet 9

Iranian sources speculate that the Guards have been pressuring Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to make a deal or get the sanctions eased by appearing to EFTA00935835...It is clear that Ali Khamenei, the "Supreme Guide" of the Khomeinist regime, lacks the qualifications to be marketed as a religious leader for Iraqi Shi'ites

EFTA02722901.pdf - DataSet 11

He couldn't defy the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, or run afoul of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard....As Khomeini did before him, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has the final say on all affairs of state, with the president relegated to being a steward of day-to-day

EFTA01073941.pdf - DataSet 9

Azadeh Moaveni Oct. 12, 2011 -- In early 2009, after Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader declared that anyone killed defending Palestine would...General Ghassem Suleimani, the chief of the Quds Force, reports directly to Ayatollah EFTA01073956 17 Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader.

Full name 172 times, last name 196 times.

And every Catholic is a foreign spy of the sovereign Vatican City state, Reagan said, I understand. We sovereigns work these things out through channels.

Jesus rejected some Jews in John 8:44 and I do too. Those Jews that are satanic will indeed bow before Christians, though that is not the first application of Rev. 3:9. The issue is that we are not to write off any group on account of some, or many, evildoers, without some formal tribunal. I see nothing that judges the children, or the religion's formal teachings, as evil.

When we discussed this before I trusted you understood the difference between charging all the people and charging specific groups. I don't encourage the use of ambiguous language that blurs this difference.

Thanks for the criticism. Objective language standards, exact communication, and desire to share context are part of the SwampRangers.com mission. I respect that your concerns about that published mission resembling other unpublished missions guessable from the actions of others require me to pursue an even higher standard. If we both keep pursuing Jesus alone we'll arrive with him together.

You can't use muh collectivism as an excuse to protect members of a group when the group exists with the sole purpose of worshipping demons.

That would be valid if (1) the children were excluded, which is not the case with the ordinary meaning of "Jews", and (2) there were proven demonstration that Judaism systematically purposes to worship demons. I've asked for recognition of the first and demonstration of the second for five years. It's not enough to show that some Jews worship demons because some people of every broad profession do so. I believe there is no systematic rejection of the true God in Judaism, there is only unwillingness to learn more about him; they might be the world's last unreached people-group, greater resisters than the insular wilderness tribes. I've laid out a challenge asking for proof that Judaism teaches rejection of the true God as a tenet, from some authoritative congregational rabbi or rabbinical org, and I haven't received it for years of challenge. So I'm always interested in what evidence people use to justify the charge above as to rabbinical Judaism.

But somehow they got the admins of this site to bypass the community members and just get put in as a mod. How does this happen?

https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ARwwofnil/conspiracies-has-suffered-a-coup/c/4eZDpMzPFpM

I think that in this transition period her new proposal is likely to address your concerns.

Facts: The only thing being cleaned up is a yearlong queue. I proposed that very old reports might rightly be mooted.

Noticing of Jews isn't cleaned up, but collectivism (judging the innocent with the guilty) is. You know I say Name The Jew For Real.

u/Perun and u/Thisisnotanexit are both new mods, TINAE is taking the lead, she reports to admin.

(Add: The community agreed 2-3 months ago that a new mod was needed, and I affirmed all who stepped forward. TINAE announced that admin privately approached her, and her potential appointment was vetted for months.

TINAE did allude to surveillance state; she has withdrawn that argument because apparently nobody agreed with it.)

We are negotiating the rules now (a step which I attempted 3 months ago). TINAE has proposed a good method of allowing free speech without falling prey to the rules against disrespect, abuse, bullying, violence, attack, etc.

AFAIK discussion of anyone's plans or of any final solution is perfectly allowed at Conspiracies.

Ooh, a conspiracy about me! I like it! I can say that I've gotten to know TINAE over 5 years online and we have thoughts that resonate, but there is no collusion unless you count a very rare DM no different from anyone else.

So you've got me being Jewish when I always affirm Jesus, hijacking moderation when I asked the community and they voted that we needed moderation, working too closely together when I said I'd support the new mod regardless of who, sending the pedo when I've gotten his accounts suspended, sending Imp when I came here telling him he was illogical and genocidal, getting people to call for moderation when the reason for calling for moderation was to restore roundtables instead, trying to install someone when I gave equal opportunity to everyone who considered being mod, and turning the place into Reddit when I've just affirmed that orderly suspension of Rule 1 wouldn't contradict Scored terms.

Well, it's a theory, anyway, it's what Conspiracies is about. When accused I stand on my actions because empty denial is rather worthless.

I identify as everything.

Trump calls it "consequence culture".

Not what he meant, I expressed the thought accurately as being less claim. The African tribes are being debated by world Jewry regularly, many are accepted fully such as those he spoke of, some are also given provisional acceptance due to weaker history. That's mostly about outlier cases though, as well as about "degree of Jewishness". To the question of who are Jews when Jews are being persecuted by government, yes or no, they all qualify, and Christians don't anymore (not since the 300s).

I didn't acknowledge that the Ashkenazi aren't Judahites. Evidence indicates they arise from the merger of Judahites and Khazarians, which eventually continued the name Judahites and not the name Khazarians. It doesn't make them non-Jews just because they have more intermix but have always been taken as Jews by Jews and most everyone else. There is no case in history I know of where mixing two together removes the right to use either name in the future; and usually a marriage takes the man's name.

Yes, when someone claims to be a Jew, Jesus warns that it's an important claim to verify. I've provided evidence that the verification is sufficient for ordinary standards (you make extraordinary claims). I've alluded to the Ashkenazi I knew who pointed out his tribe had less claim on Judaism than many African tribal Sabbatarians, solely because of the Khazar ingrafting. If you want to get specific about any evidence I should consider about what I'm not seeing about continuity of Judah/Jewry, I'm still waiting. But words like "genocidal" I counsel journalistic patience about.

Thanks, the car issue is resolved.

You seem to be disappointed that I wrote 200 words to frame a useful historical document I posted without putting more than a "---" to indicate where the document began (to those who couldn't tell it was a document); that's the main reference I understand your comments to mean.

If you mean all my comments taken together, you raised many issues. The one sentence necessary to the issue in this comment is what most people understand: Though unimportant outliers exist, Jewishness is defined by birth or naturalization into the self-maintained Jewish people historically descended from Judah and his brothers.

Jews are people born or naturalized into the family of Judah and his brothers. Pretty simple. The family as a group monitors itself.

Though there are edge cases, they do not extend to the general claim that e.g. (pick your favorite) all Ashkenazim are not Jews. The fact is that Ashkenazim have been accepted by (basically) all Jews as Jews since they became a subtribe. There's no edge-case status about that.

The burden is on you to show something historical, like the merger of two peoples somehow causing the loss of rights to continue using the name of one of those two peoples (which has never happened AFAIK).

However, there has never been a right for outsiders to name groups maliciously against the groups' preferences. For instance, some whites reject the right of Jews to define the term "white".

This comment was pretty well complete but unposted when I dealt with a minor family emergency, so it will have to do for now. Thank you for the civilized discussion.

Jesus says twice they are not Jews. I don't know why it's so hard for followers of Jesus to hear Jesus say they are not Jews and to tell him they are Jews. Too much Scofield interpretation going on, methinks, self-deprecating.

I thought of a new one BTW. The fact is that nobody in that century would take "satanic synagogue" as meaning all synagogues were satanic. The fact is that synagogues meant culturally acceptable religiosity anywhere the word was used and rarely had a negative overtone. Logically, by saying "satanic synagogue" Jesus is saying that it's a totally new kind of synagogue, not something that already existed. It's unlike the acceptable ones and is evil in its origin and practice (unlike the understanding about the thousands of others at the time). He explains the reason is that, unlike what would have to be called "traditional synagogues" by contrast, this synagogue was not composed of Jews but of Gentiles who lie that they are Jews. The only reason people read Jesus as saying the opposite of what he said is not listening to his words as they would be understood by his primary audience. Denial of the Shepherd.

Anyway, this is suitable for another thread, even the one I linked. It's a simple matter to trace how the false application of Jesus's words began recently among collectivists. If you wish to defend what I see to be false with your facts and logic, I just complimented you for your handling of similar things including your handling on this thread, so I think we can make headway.

To OP obviously (I just said) Deut. 28 shows that any "Zionism" should admit both the positive and the negative promises to Israel, just like we admit positive and/or negative promises to many other nations in Scripture, notably Egypt and Syria. So it's a good point if it's not taken into collectivism. Some Zionists are big cherry-pickers about promises.