I mean back in 2000 the original UN plan was exclusively to shore up economies through replacement migration so perhaps.
I think there's 2 obvious explanations. I think the first is more possible IMO because it's just more common.
1 - They are just stupid and they think that "nationalism caused wars ergo remove all nationalism" because at their heart they are just managers materialistic who think anything can be a uniform number on a spreadsheet. Mixing the world means that everywhere is the same, and everything can be part of the bureaucracy to be managed. They are mangers, therefore they must manage. They live in a bubble so anyone who doesn't sniff their farts is excluded, so they genuinely think it's not a problem.
2 - They are evil. It's either Jews, Pedo elites cutting down population because the Trisolans told them too or they are just evil and want to exert power for powers sake, maybe they identified a little too hard with Obrien in 1984.
I think it's number 1 because any scenario with #2 also requires them to be stupid enough to believe it can work, they're basically the Umbrella Corporation from the final resident evil movie and just want the world population to be umbrella corporation clones because reasons.
to set precedent to undo Trump's once he is out of office. Or something similar.
The only reason to set precedent is to make it legal. Why the fuck would they care? they'll just do it once he's out of office.
I'm guessing the post was cropped to remove the date of 04/01/2015 or whenever this was originally posted .
Supersaurus just because it's probably the largest land animal ever and it was named by a scientists kid (probably).
- Michael Jackson
- Queen
- Carl Orlf
- Beethoven
- The first rendition of the 1812 overture with the cannons.
Counterpoint:
Women are simply not turned on by studious, cautious engineers and businessmen with smart plans for the future. They are turned on by rock stars, rappers, athletes, serial killers, and gang members.
They are turned on by status, and status is given to Men by other Men. If Men bought jerseys with engineers names on them and paid money to go watch engineers work each Sunday then engineers would be sex symbols.
Yes I know this doesn't include the violent sex symbols which is a separate minority.
Macron's office initially denied the authenticity of the images, before they were confirmed as genuine.
Lol
In a few years I'd actually like to know what that was, they just kind of turned around and drove home. And no-one has any competent or realistic explanation as to what it was and why it went home.
Probably not the time the french unleashed their moroccans too rape an Italian town in WW2 either.
It was definitely held above water by Tom Cruise. I could overlook all the plot contrivances, questionable editing, length, convoluted plot and girl bossing because I got the impression that the director didn't hate me. No doubt because Tom Cruise was a producer and used his star power. If he wasn't in it, it would be awful.
Wait till you find out what car and life insurers are using your data for.
"Don't Judge" in the biblical sense, even on the most superficial level, is a warning against being a hypocrite. "Lest ye be judged" is the second half. If you're not ok to be judged on that standard, don't judge others. If you are, then judge away. It's re iterated in another gospel with the passage about noticing the speck in your neighbours eye but ignoring the log in yours.
"Don't judge a book by it's cover" is so monumentally stupid. If someone ever asks says that in person, ask what the point of a cover of a book is.
Let me back up, I think he had a persuasion filter that was very useful for 80% of reality, and would try to fight a rear guard to stretch it over the remainder rather than just acknowledging it.
He did that by communicating in a feminine way. He used words not to communicate direct information but to influence and lead you to a certain point abstractly or indirectly. That is feminine communication, not masculine.
I'm not trying to say he didn't have his faults or defend them, I'm saying that I think he will be judged positively as time goes on, as ultimately he did more good than harm.
Yes, people see james lindsey sperging out but forget that what sent him this crazy was actually deep diving into marxist literature and pulling and revealing the threads that prove that yes anti racism was explicitly created from marxism.
I disagree on the premise that there's more than one way to skin a cat.
I agree in your assessment of him, he obfuscates and personally is a weird dude with a weird way of looking at the world.
I disagree with you; in the fact that he is, at the end of the day, on "our side" of the fence. And has been for decades, whilst living in California and remaining effective at messaging despite being cancelled multiple times.
In a war, not everyone has to be shooting. Someone has to drive the trucks bringing supplies. I think if you tally up what he's actually done, judge him by the fruits he bears, he will squarely end up having done good.
Case in point, you watch any video of him and you probably end up angry. 90% you are angry about a specific based topic, and you are angry because you didn't think he went far enough.
But your thinking about that topic and you can't stop thinking about it. That's the point.
I'm not sure that's an accurate summation of his views. It's really hard to know his views because he rarely says them outright, or even has them concretely. Many many times he's talked about techniques to play it both ways by saying things semi ambiguously and allowing people to "hallucinate" in the gaps as he put it. Probably his biggest flaw was being aggressive to those that made the logical assumptions that he without a doubt knew what he was doing. For example he'd make a post counting 1 through to 10 but miss the 4, obviously insinuating that 4 was the missing number, then when someone accused him of saying the number 4 he's accuse them of hallucinating it because he never actually physically said the number.
He definitely left the conclusions about the covid shots unsaid, many many times he'd follow the patterns of "this is what the FDA said and I'll spend 40 minutes shredding it, but conclude with "they're the experts and we should follow the experts"
It allows people to draw the conclusions they want from it.
Ok I watched the part where he talks about it.
I first read the Dilbert Future in the late 90's and have followed him since ever since the back section of the book talks about affirmations and even back then talked about reality not quite being what it seems.
I think someone who produces a "rise and fall" documentary of him well will produce hours of extremely interesting content.
It's hard to summarise him from that time period but I'll do my best.
Scott Adams is one of the best ways to "open the door" to alternative ways of thinking, but his failure is the next stop of "doing something" with that new knowledge falls a little flat. Any criticism of him I think stems from misusing something that he's created. It'd be like finding Excalibur and pulling it from a stone, only to use it as a door stop.
I really really think that history will judge him favourably as time goes on as his waffling fence sitting period will fade into history and his initial takes on reality being moldable as humans fundamentally view reality irrationally, the 2 movies on one screen becomes his legacy.
It's probably too early to talk about lessons from his life but I think ultimately his life shows that reality matters. Sure you can bend reality but ultimately it still gets a say. I'll use his love life as an example, he had a "normal" marriage to "Shelley" initially and divorced a few decades ago, then he delved into the reality bending phase and met and married Christina a smoking hot neuroscientist instagram model. But a Woman like that is one day, inevitably, going to roll over one morning and see through the spell and realise that Scott is just an old, dweeby, effeminate bald nerd and from that moment the marriage was doomed.
Yes you can make yourself a charming man of mystery and make anyone fall in love with you, but at the end of the day, 10's do not marry 3's.
I'm sad he's going, and especially in such a painful way. He's certainly someone that you could benefit from studying quite a bit after he's gone. That's probably the best eulogy you could say about anyone. He definitely made a mark on the world despite not having Children of his own.
Because the counter point is obvious, you need a discrete number of engineers to maintain clean water and sanitation, you need a certain number of people willing to maintain sewers and fix downed power lines late at night in storms.
The competency crisis threatens this, if we make it through the population squeeze it will be bountiful on the other side for your children and grand children.
Look at South Africa.
Korea is an ancient and noble civilisation and it's terribly sad to see it destroyed in mere decades by American liberalism. It's weird that North Korea, a literal fucking starving hermit kingdom is a genetic lifeboat of the Korean people.
EDIT
I don't actually think Korea or any other country will literally collapse because there will be a minority of people that reject this, and they will have enough kids that will grow up into an empty society that will be bountiful for them. They will be the next baby boomer generation.
Those laws are already on the books in the US and could be enforced by any state or federal attorney general at any time over the last 40-50 years I think. Never been used once.
I spent a fair amount of time looking at that photo and didn't see anything.
I only listened to it once but I seem to remember him addressing what to do and how to screen for Women. Just be based on the first date and they'll screen themselves.
Literally a joke in the Ali G movie.
Israel v Palestine is like choosing a side between 2 serial killers. Yes I'm sure one has physically killed 15 people while the other has only killed 13, but "two less victims" doesn't make me support them.