10
subbookkeeper 10 points ago +10 / -0

The first step is acquiring a carbon source. One possibility is to remove carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, by passing air through systems that use either filters or chemicals to extract the CO2. That has the benefit of being truly carbon-neutral, in that no more carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere than has already been removed from it. Unfortunately, because CO2 constitutes a mere 0.04 percent of all atmospheric gases, removing and concentrating it on an industrial scale is an immense challenge. “The problem with pulling it out of air is, it’s hard to be efficient, because it’s very dilute,”

The irony of that paragraph

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes sorry I committed the shit forum dude of talking about a video and not posting it. I'll do a progressive circuit of apologising and learning to do better and grovel at everyone's feet.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

There will be actual people that want to be considered intellectuals, the sam harris/triggernometry types that will only now consider this as a problem.

16
subbookkeeper 16 points ago +16 / -0

Carl Benjamin did a good video on her recently about how she's apparently organically leaving the ideology and what a good case study it is.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

"You have no hope because you have no outside objective structures to give you structure and order so your sense of hope comes from inside, and is fleeting. It will soon turn into ash in the wind"

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Monopolies basically don't exist. I agree with economists on this.

I just want youtube to shut down and die though. I think it'd be the best thing for the internet if it did. I remember pre youtube days and a decentralised net was far better.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember being a teen and being incredibly stubborn about the monty hall problem untill I "got it"

It was one of my first red pill moments before I knew what that was.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd be interested to know what they said to get him in that room beforehand in such a "friendly" manner.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do some work with a kid in our respective home country and see him use google quite a bit.

He searches for something and copy pastes what gemini provides and doesn't really seem aware that there are actual websites below that.

6
subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

If I didn't see the thread title or the last 2 seconds I could watch that ad a thousand times and not guess it was from Jaguar.

That should be a trend, cut off the last frames and show it to people and get them to guess what it's for.

1
subbookkeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

They seem to be revealing their hand kind of early.

12
subbookkeeper 12 points ago +14 / -2

It's one of those "language updates" but this ones actually makes sense.

"Pornography" is a legal and consensual act. Child porn is not "children doing pornography" by definition. It is a record of sexual assault of children, the new name is far more accurate, just a bit more unwieldy

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate the woke elements review.

view more: Next ›