9
omnirin 9 points ago +10 / -1

Well praise white supremacy at the gym then. I don't want to be dying from a heart attack at 40 because I'm a lazy fat ass. I'll be a white supremacist at the gym all I want. Fuck these journos.

15
omnirin 15 points ago +17 / -2

"Satan Whore, shut the fuck up". That's all you have to answer to these people.

11
omnirin 11 points ago +12 / -1

the logic is women sucking dicks for money == empowerment

men drawing sexy women == objectification

That's basically the capitalist version of Marxism AKA progressivism.

17
omnirin 17 points ago +18 / -1

My god, that's sex worker exclusionary! SWERF! Airbnb are fucking bigots! /s

See? Prostitutes are "marginalized" by the vile patriarchy! Someone quickly creates outrage on reddit!

0
omnirin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Idiot, 100% fake not the same person at all on both photos. But I guess you can't tell one black person from another.

-2
omnirin -2 points ago +6 / -8

I don't know why people even care about that guy here, he is a "british" "celebrity" and a pornographer and represents everything that is wrong with our civilization. Because the left hates him? He's very much a leftist as the rest of the pornographers because of his complete lacks of morals. Only in US idiots are trying to frame him as "alt-right" or something.

1
omnirin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, I was skeptical because her skin tone made me suspicious that she'd just be a case of Netflix hiring the first passably non-white actress they got their hands on, but her performance was one of the best in the show, really only topped by Cavill.

Well to be fair, while Yennifer in the game is white, in the region (Poland), the actress could definitely pass as a gipsy and they were already there in Bohemia in medial Europe, and many were considered "witches". Obviously the black actors were a bit harder to swallow. Even if there were moorish people there too, they did look more like Arabs than negroes.

But that isn't really the issue so much as the team in charge of the writing who despise or actively mock the source material. It should never happen.

by folx
5
omnirin 5 points ago +6 / -1

I mean if you take manga and anime, there is plenty of gay characters. I remember in Saint Seya a character like Shun was dubbed by a woman in my country until the production realized that it was a man and changed the voice actor. And while I don't watch them, there is plenty of yaoi anime, or shows homosexual innuendos (JoJo Bizarre Adventures).

So it's not so much about shoving LGBT characters than the preachy, patronizing tone, or shows that need to belittle straight males because otherwise "LGBT" characters can't stand on their own. And of course these "inclusive" characters are "bad ass" never make a mistake, are never made fun of, are perfect in everyway, and writers and show runners think they are owed a medal or something and go on and on about "diversity" in interviews.

So it's not so much about shoving LGBT characters in shows, than these shows becoming purely about parading LGBT characters with no reason others than for the writer to get twitter likes from their followers or something, or even worse sometimes, the production mandates 50% of LGBT, 50% of diversity and has guidelines that comes straight out from activist organisations that are partisan by definition.

The great majority of anime or manga aren't partisan, they don't push this or that ideology, they just tell a story. Hunter X Hunter has at least 2 characters that are transvestites, one of them is an assassin, the author isn't pushing progressivism or communism or trying to satisfying a checklist from a woke organisation.

That's the difference, the mandates from western productions that require ideological purity.

7
omnirin 7 points ago +8 / -1

Too bad, I liked Yennifer's actress, although I was skeptical at first. But blame the unhinged writers, the show runner and whoever hired these idiots. I will never understand these studio literally putting dollars on fire by ruining IP.

21
omnirin 21 points ago +22 / -1

thank you

these idiots literally believe that they actually look like women, that's some high level of delusion...

0
omnirin 0 points ago +1 / -1

So reddit blocked? when?

3
omnirin 3 points ago +4 / -1

A statement from The Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) states that it is "aware of multiple complaints about a sexually explicit performance marketed to children held in Fort Lauderdale on December 26th."

A prosecutor needs to be on that case, not yet another random administration, and shut down whoever is showing pornography to children. Drag Queens are literally adult performers, who in their right minds would let strippers perform in front of kids? But hey, it's "LGBT+", if you criticize you're a "bigot"... enough with that madness. What the fuck conservatives are doing at the federal level against all that? Nothing.

15
omnirin 15 points ago +16 / -1

SJW are like pedophiles, they always double down. This is the pedophile elite doubling down, they know that sexualizing children is now acceptable on the left. Or why would the left subject their kids and other people's to transvestite porn shows?

And where are the conservatives on it? Asleep at the fucking wheel, striking deals with "progressives" in the house and senate...

0
omnirin 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're not trying to ban the word woman for being offensive,

the whole point is that the word "woman" is offensive to trannies, because (male) trannies don't have a uterus, can't get pregnant, so it disqualifies them as women at first place.

This language is dehumanizing but it's not really euphemistic.

No, the language is very much euphemistic, by the very definition of the word.

6
omnirin 6 points ago +7 / -1

"people with periods"

"people with uteruses"

"people with milk in their tits"

"people with eggs"

how do you tell progressivism? By the excessive use of euphemisms. The problem with euphemisms is that people are actually aware they are euphemisms, including the people who can't handle reality. Ultimately even euphemism become offensive.

Remember when saying "black people" was offensive? Now "african american" is offensive, better use "Blacks"... I'm not making that shit up. It's on the infamous stanford list of banned words...

2
omnirin 2 points ago +3 / -1

right, because obese people usually cannot lie down, ironically or they are at risk of snapping their neck.

1
omnirin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Progressivism is a self-solving problem, eunuchs and gays can't have kids, and fat "body acceptance" jack asses will die young. But their ideology needs to be isolated from the rest of the population. That's the hardest part because it always looks for more victims, more people to groom into insanity.

6
omnirin 6 points ago +7 / -1

I mean that's pretty obvious. It's meant to turn the kids into sex objects that will go into prostitution as soon as they are 16, and that's for the lucky ones.

Pedos often show pornographic content to children before trying to rape them, it's literally what grooming means. To manipulate children into consenting the most disgusting fetishes.

Imagine if someone exposed you to scatophilia or zoophilia since you were 6. Of course you're going to grow up completely fucked up in the head and depraved.

Why the cops or the FBI aren't doing anything about all that obscenity is the real question.

-8
omnirin -8 points ago +3 / -11

African Americans =/= all black people.

"black" isn't a culture, no more than "white" is. Blacks can't be Christian now? Jesus certainly wasn't white.

22
omnirin 22 points ago +23 / -1

Yes, it's going to suck.

16
omnirin 16 points ago +17 / -1

Yes, we need to add these categories instead:

Best pre-op tranny actor

Best post-op tranny actor

Best MtF tranny actor

Best FtM tranny actor

Best pedophile actor

Best child groomer actor

Best gay actor

Otherwise it's just queer erasure!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›