Benetton goes Balenciaga
(twitter.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
SJW are like pedophiles, they always double down. This is the pedophile elite doubling down, they know that sexualizing children is now acceptable on the left. Or why would the left subject their kids and other people's to transvestite porn shows?
And where are the conservatives on it? Asleep at the fucking wheel, striking deals with "progressives" in the house and senate...
SJWs are pedophiles
Titus, get the cross.
Quite unsurprising from a company that used 'diversity' before everyone else did, and which advertised using death row inmates who had tortured, raped and murdered their victims.
That's the stuff wokies love, as is this.
Don't forget, they also used death bed pics of a gay man dying of aids too. United Colors of Benetton includes ghouls as well.
Tell me what "this" is. What am I supposed to be offended by here? You can go to any department store that sells underwear for kids and see pics of kids in underwear on the packaging.
If there were bondage bears, okay. If there were sexually suggestive poses, okay. But my only takeaway from this is "you can never show pics of kids in underwear for any reason because people trying to stir up a moral panic will latch onto it, even though you're literally selling underwear and you have models for all your clothes."
Of course you can do that by looking at the packaging. This is an Instagram post. What is this Instagram post selling exactly? It's not even clear.
Not "for any reason", but this is definitely inappropriate to the extreme.
That, and... it's not like I go around looking at packages or children's underwear, so I might be wrong, but I don't think the kids on there usually 1) look like someone just tore half their clothes off of them, and 2) have these fucking looks on their faces.
That is part of the issue. Maybe they're all this bad? But I doubt it. It's certainly not something I want to research.
That's the issue for me, too. The shirt tucked into the underwear, and the sweater or whatever half off. That's what gave me the immediate 'ick' factor. What the heck? If you need to show models in underwear for your ad*...do that. Why does it look like they were either stripping or, as you say, sexually assaulted? And, yeah, they look dead inside. The additional clothes make it creepier than if it had just been underwear.
* which you don't.
Is there anyway we can blur this post as NSFW so you have to click to view, all of us don't need to see this pop up on our phones or computers
We don't work at a fashion industry
Done.
Benetton has always been woke, pedo and creepy.
Don't make me tap the sign.
Is there a religion that actually kills pedophiles and punishes those that helps them? I would advocate for that one.
Best I can do is one that calls them prophets.
No deals. More than one wife is insane.
'scuse me, what the fuck?!
It's not really the same in the sense that this is just kids in underwear presumably for a brand that literally sells kids underwear.
In the past this would not have been noticed at all. It's only now, AFTER the balenciaga scandal, that suddenly showing a little girl in a bra and panties is a scandal.
I don't see anything sexualizing in the picture. The poses aren't sexually suggestive. There are no bondage bears. This comes across to me as falling more in the "moral panic" side vs the "corrupting the kids" side.
How? Just a pic of the underwear with no models? For a fashion corpo which posts models for all their clothes? Seems weird.
Good. Maybe the pedos in the "fashion" industry will finally be held accountable.
Such a sad, disgusting sight.
I remember when Benetton made headlines by having a kickass Formula 1 team, not by exploiting minors.
Eh, they're kids in underwear. It's not like you had to mark this NSFW.
Actually, someone just asked me to.