When a communist tells fellow communists they want to be farmers, they get called names and told to fuck off. It's fucking hilarious.
Is there a single aspect of life in which they are not utterly, retardedly, hilariously delusional?
Like you, I think they'd rather avoid that. But assuming for a moment that the presidency holds real power, then they'd rather assassinate him than allow him to ascend to it while vowing "retribution".
It's true, also, that a cornered animal is desperate. If Trump does represent a real threat to them - and there may be some hope of that, since they're trying so hard to stop him, although I think that's more about the populism he represents - they might decide they have nothing left to lose.
Instead, they had to act like total psychos.
I resent them for that more than I express, but since it revealed their true selves, I'm glad they did. At least we know what we're fighting. Better yet, a significant amount of people are waking up to their ways. Their hubris is their downfall. I hope.
You don't want to do that because you are ceding control over reality and objectivity itself.
I struggle sometimes with whether it's the right move to adopt their weapons (after all, when the dust clears you want a healthy society) but I disagree that it would be ceding control. They're already redefining everything. They already have superiority in the realm of dishonest argument, because they engage in it all the time, and we try not to. But our insistent adherence to reality is one of our major strengths, and it would be risky to give that up.
However, I agree that driving a threat underground runs the risk of it proliferating unchecked. But there's a difficult balance to achieve. Some of what you describe occurring at Stonewall is indeed harmful to a wider society, but society was definitively stronger when homosexuality was segregated. It's when it become 'integrated' that the slippery slope came into full, alarming effect - admittedly at the hands of dishonest activists who wished it so. And really, has gay marriage helped homosexual men so much? Anecdotally, I don't see a great uptick in the amount of healthy, monogamous relationships. It certainly hasn't improved the moral rectitude of the gay community, which seems as degenerate and promiscuous as it ever was, and much more subversive.
Besides, I'm of the firm belief that society needs an underground scene as a sort of pressure valve for the misfits of said society, or even those who resent the growing regimentation of the west - as long as their harmful ways are kept localized to the underground scene. Which is difficult to achieve - like I said, it's a difficult balance.
As to whether we need laws against homosexuality, enforced or otherwise - I was really just playing devil's advocate, and I suppose acknowledging how much better things seemed to work in the semi-recent past, when 'unofficial tolerance' was the way. But I think removing propaganda and anti-speech cabals alone would put us in a much better position to keep the sickness in check. In truth, I legitimately do not care what gay people do to each other so long as they're not messing with kids or spreading disease to a wider society.
But thank you for the engaging and informative reply.
Not among the ruling class!
Her twitter is empty except for making claims of abuse every couple of months. It couldn't be more obvious that it's a grift.
Being disgusted, voicing that disgust, and holding firmly to your standards is not being a victim.
Even though by deliberately subverting what we care about they seek to victimize us.
If you want to play the game, play it. You don't need to make excuses for setting your standards aside. You don't need to convince yourself that the game isn't so bad, really, because it deigns to let you avert your eyes.
Yeah, there are greater threats. Those threats came about because we let our culture get subverted, and entertainment was a big part of that. The overton window is a powerful thing.
Have you ever heard of Iceberg Theory? That shit infests the game world even when it's not actively being shoved in your face. It will always float to the surface.
Can you take it seriously, as a setting created with integrity, and feel like you're not being insulted? I can't.
It's just the same as 'needing' the ability to make amputees or wheelchair bound people, it's another step on their holy quest to make sure every last person on earth (above white males on the progressive stack) gets to be literally represented in a game, and damn the resource expenditure.
It's a non-issue made political because they always need a new crusade, basically.
It's not as bad as what passes for most modern 'games', but it's still bad. They just cared about making a decent game on top of the wokeness.
Don't go out of your way to support it. They don't exactly deserve your money. But if you want to play it, buying it is probably less supportive of harmful subversion than buying other games would be.
Even as short sighted and incompetent as they are, they're afraid to kill him. The Trump train might not be running as strongly as it was (he really did have a disappointing first term in office), and the right might have taken a lot of shit until now, but there is a non-zero high chance that assassinating their leader would ignite a huge powder keg.
But the powers that be are morons. Cunning manipulators and immoral liars, but complete idiots. Maybe they underestimate the powder keg, or in fact think they want to take advantage of it. So your scenario is possible.
Personally I think he gets back in office and does nothing useful. His base cheers and declares victory, Trump bloviates, we make some small victories, nothing really gets better. I do think his heart is in the right place (to the extent it isn't dwarfed by his ego and desire to be popular) but I don't think he wants to get his hands dirty with anything real.
We can survive that if we don't fall into complacency. The real change has to come from us. And it already is.
He's just looking for ideas on how to be a worse Prime Minster. Joke's on him, he couldn't possibly be worse.
Am I tempting fate, here?
They couldn't give a fuck about the fact that men's spaces have been rendered completely non-existent for the sake of appeasing a bunch of bitter feminists, which is why they can all go fuck themselves.
They never care to be consistent in their views. They demand compassion and action, and have nothing for men but snide insults. Partly this is a function of stupidity, but one cannot ignore the innate psychopathy and sense of entitlement that pervades their ideology.
For me it was the 'pro choice' types supporting mandatory vaccination. They can go fuck themselves.
Bioware ruined CRPGs. They started the rot and welcomed the audience change.
You're right. Everything about the game is off putting. Even basic scenes feel terrifically stale and amateurish even before you get to the writing.
But the woke shit doesn't help at all.
That was more of a cool mechanic than anything. A macro thing that was a neat addition to an RPG, because their friendship or relationship values would affect optional scenes you'd see, how likely they were to get pissed if the other fell in battle and so forth. It was one of the things that drew me to it as well, and it's completely different from the marketing, and the game itself, revolving around badly written romances specifically written for players (specifically females and gays) to get their rocks off.
(Edit: By 'macro thing' I mean you were sort of managing the relationships, you weren't down in the trenches.)
Western RPG. Like how Japanese RPGs are called JRPGs. It's talking about the style of game moreso than place of origin, they just happen to align most of the time.
Yeah but it kind of has the same result, doesn't it? The leftists/global elites are always dishonestly redefining terms to get their way, so why can't we define homosexuality as the evil cultural subversion and just turn a blind eye to the sexual acts? Actually, didn't it work that way for a long time? Homosexual acts were technically illegal but the laws just weren't enforced?
How is it possible to be be a communist and still be a fat fuck?
They think they'll be the ones telling everyone else what to do while they take all the resources, which in their minds makes being a fat communist perfectly sensible.
Oh THE EXPERTS said it, I guess I'll just ignore the evidence of my own eyes and the alarm bells ringing in my head if THE EXPERTS said it.
Fucking pathetic excuse for a human being. He's a braincuck, he gets off to watching his own thoughts be replaced with the wet thrusting of propaganda bulls.
Dominick T. Armentano
Holy shit, I thought you were talking about Guybrush Threepwood's voice actor for a moment (Dominic Armato)
Sounds like a good read though, thanks.
It's probably calculated subversion. Our sanctuaries of - well not quite free speech, but freer than the wider hyper-pozzed internet - are too useful to us, they have to be made less so. Propaganda and division, is still the most effective weapon they have.
Seems pretty petty to just take that away, because you can, simply to force everyone to only have access to this year's content, week by week, lol...
Especially if you're not actually fuckin' teaching anything!
She doesn't want you learning anything but her propaganda. She's disgusting.
What's weird is that it's only sort of. They have this super-weird double-think going on where depending on crazy circumstances, giving your friend a bro-job is totally not gay bro. However, homosexuality is somehow also obviously evil.
We could do with that kind of doublethink. Let people do what they want, no harm no foul, but stop the cultural subversion in its tracks.
More dishonest weaselcuntery.
God bless based Aussie Malcolm Roberts for asking these questions.
There's some reasoning involved for me, but it's mostly things like 'We as a species don't know nearly as much as we think we do,' which I use to navigate the obstacles my rational side tries to throw in the way of my faith. Intuition is still very necessary, and not just in matters of faith either.
Progressives only ever use reason as an argument when they want you to abandon your gut instinct. Most of the time they don't give a flying fuck about what's rational, they live by the creed 'my feels over objective reals, Nazi scum', but the second your healthy intuition rejects their sick web of propaganda, suddenly (their mangled version of) rationality is back on the menu!