Roughly 3% of western men have autogynephilic thoughts.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005209/
At max, 2% of dudes think they're chicks. There's probably some overlap there.
It's also true in the US. If we were going to hate groups based on their ethnicity, which I of course oppose, surely the group commtting 53% of the homicides despite making up 13% would be a far more worthy candidate.
Yeah, the hate bit is stupid. Finding the line that ethnonationalism has valid and practical application can be a tough one. Too many fall off the argument, and into ideology traps. I do it myself sometimes.
As to 13/53, it's old hat. I think it's mostly convinced those who will be convinced. Every once in awhile, the arguments are worth reiterating, but the facts are known, with a wealth of supporting data.
But, in the end, it shouldn't be about hatred. Ethnonationalism has dirty connotation, but there is a solid rationale to it. It's just not well placed to replace in most parts.
Precisely what criticism can you not utter because of the Holocaust?
It seems to work like this: "If you criticize, Israel, Jews as a people, point out that someone is Jewish, or that Jews are disproportionately represented in a field (especially the lawyer/banker/journalist class), it's anti-semtiism. Anti-semitism is what created the Holocaust. If you continue to follow this line of reasoning, you're a Nazi. You don't want to be a Nazi, do you?"
Firings may follow.
How is it then that you only 'notice' when something is in accordance of your ideology, and you don't happen to 'notice' when it's not? Surely, if impressive skills of perception and 'pattern recognition' were involved, you'd see: "wow, there sure are a lot of Jews being regressives, and also a whole lot of Jews being against them".
Who said I don't notice? There's just no major purpose in stating it. Though, I guess there kind of is, if it's part of how you're informing your opinions.
It seems the more influential are on the regressive side. Those who push back tend to be pretty Zionist or neoconservative. I don't see it as a black and white choice. None of these ideologies are really in my interest.
I don't think that exists. I see far more attacks on Jews than any other ethnic group, even ethnic groups who deserve it more.
That may be true in Europe. Not really sure. In the US, evangelicism has severe judeophilia due to Armageddon prophesy. There's also no critical examination of Jews throughout history on what brings about their persecution. If it's spoken of at all, it's attributed to "jealousy" or "scapegoating". Intellectually dishonest. edit: In our education setting we also generally spend more time on the Holocaust and individual stories than we do on WW2.
Their biggest issue has always been lack of assimilation. Just the persistence of distinctly Jewish identities across Europe for centuries is testament to this fact, though we can even see this lack of assimilation between Jewish communities when forced together into ghettos. They moved up the Rhine for trade opportunities, but they never really emigrated. They just moved. Usury certainly didn't help perceptions.
But the main driver of judeophilia is, of course, the Holocaust. Judeophilia may not be as apt a word, here, but it's certainly a shield. Any criticism as a people is strictly taboo because of the big H's big H.
Tell me about it. I know that Jews are more likely to be regressives, but I deny that this is because of some essence of pure evil in their blood. It's because they are more likely to be professionals and so called 'intellectuals'. What is the truth to which you think I am blind?
Why boil it down to evil? They have a high verbal acumen in their blood (if you buy into IQ). They make a lot of arguments. Hell, half their religion seems to be arguing the nuance of just how much they can get away with without violating their holy scrolls. Natural lawyers.
I think the greater question is, just how many lawyers do we need? Does a plethora of lawyers create its own issues? Does an overabundance of the professional class create societal imbalance? Just how much of an economy should deal with and reward financing production of goods, versus the actual creation of goods (and therefore value)? Can an oversized intellectual class be unhealthy for a nation?
I think so.
I never see those people on threads where there's a Jew opposing regressivism, of whom there are none too few.
They exist, but I disagree with the last part. There are too few. Regardless, to praise them would just be the "based black man" meme. The problem isn't one of individuals, but of demographic tendency.
Your sort says "it's the jews", the red pills say "it's the women", the nationalists say "it's the mexicans (or the chinese)" and the race baiters say "it's the blacks".
You forgot "weak men". And there's truth in every argument, but no single one is a complete picture.
Yeah, sort of, though I think it has more to do with the judeophile conditioning we're taught from womb to grave. When people start looking at it objectively, it creates a bit of a "They Live" hysteria. You want to give everyone glasses, but you just come off as crazy. Of course, that just isolates the person, distorting their perspective and feeding paranoia, and the ability to create a nuanced and reasoned argument becomes lost. It becomes The Jews, rather than a characteristic that seems prevalent in the Jewish demographic.
But, that's not the same thing as pointing out that some individual degenerate journalist or academic is Jewish, as they often are. That's just to trigger others pattern recognition.
When the FBI estimated that 50-60% of communists in the US were Jewish during the Red Scare, that doesn't somehow absolve the 40-50% who weren't Jewish. However, it's easy to blame Jews for the 2/50, just like it's easy to blame the 13/50 for disproportionate violence.
I came back to Epic
boo to you, sir.
To your questions:
Not sure, and not.
Yes.
No, and No, and ect. No, other than kia2 and pure injections of absurdity.
Our problem isn't just an economic one. It's also a messaging issue.
Much like CNN, they believe a leftist regime is coming into power. It's a short term investment for long term gains. We're close to a major turning, and corporations have mostly signaled their loyalty. Whether or not they win depends on how people like us approach it. Shit arguments will have shit results. They have quantity to their advantage, but quality reasoning is hard to ignore.
If you think it's all women, name them. Build a trail of reason to follow.
The Israeli government seems fairly progressive authoritarian. Granted, they haven't abolished the Knesset, but its structure and legislative freedom would suggest tyranny of the majority.
Not that I'm complaining.