First wave was mostly "let me own property and not be property" along with "let me vote". While at first glance, the vote thing was a mistake, in practice it gave most married men a double vote. Even though women could own property, it wasn't really an aspiration.
The problems arose with the second wave, and the rejection of all tradition, which is baked into all Jewish critical theory.
Judging people based on their ethnicity is ignoring their individuality.
On this we agree, but I would never judge an individual as anything but an individual. Where we probably disagree, is that to me, a demographic group must be looked at as a demographic group, even though it's comprised of individuals. I have nothing against an individual black person, but I know blacks commit half the homicides in my nation. They also have a different way of thinking (as a group, though individuals do closely mirror my own thinking), that I believe is highly destructive to all the ideas my ancestors have built up. If they were half the demographic group, and their social values were the same, there would be no rationale to find their inclusion immoral in relation to my own demographic.
As for enrichment, many countries have suffered economically because they threw out a group of middlemen.
Yes, financial innovation helps Capitalism. Capitalism at its heart works off of greed, which is simply human nature. However, pure greed is destructive to social trust. There is a balance to find between individual liberty, and social benefit. Anarcho-Capitalism is as horrible of an idea as Communism. Jews (as a group) tend towards both extremes. All extremes, really. It's hard to moderate that influence. Individually, Jews run the gamut, but they find themselves individually at the extremes in disproportion, and that acts as a force multiplier of those extremes where ever the group exists.
Anti-semitism is immoral for the same reason as hating any other race is.
You assume hate, which is emotional. My question concerns the rationale. Why, from a rational standpoint, is antisemitism (or racism) immoral? It's a question I've never seen answered. There is simply a dogma that insulates it from inquisition.
Maybe we should start with a basic definition of morality? For myself, it's an action or encouragement that harms societal trust or enrichment for individual benefit.
The impetus of second and third wave feminism were Jewish in nature. Now, these two women didn't act without a firm groundwork of critical theory in place to reject tradition, but these two are at the nexus of the most destructive forces to the family in Western societies.
Do you want me to find their Jewish facilitators? They're there, but it's a lot of research to give you names and connections, and I have no illusion you'd be convinced even if the research was put in front of you.
How about a simpler question? Is antisemitism immoral, and if so, why?
Jewish women have nothing to do with obliterating the foundation of society.
I read up to Crossroads of Twilight. Too much Elayne, Egwene, and Nynaeve. Not enough Rand and Matt. And Perrin was pretty boring most of the time. Some of the misc chapters were entertaining enough, but the focus on the Tower was a drag.
Did it improve?
Anyway, I couldn't give a rat's fuck about a possed Amazon series.
It's just Marxism evolving.
https://www.anumuseum.org.il/blog-items/frankfurt-school-jewish-intellectuals-made-60s/
The goal is the destruction of western capitalist nations. Mass unskilled immigration is just one of many tools used to achieve those ends.
Well, I don't think putting all your eggs in the Jewish CRISPR Womb basket is very realistic. Also, terrifying.
I don't hate women, though. I doubt my wife would betray me or our family for an ideology that disgusts her about as much as it does me. A lot of modern women are admittedly shit, but so are modern men. Weak, infantile, self-absorbed. We've all been groomed to varying degrees become this way, but some of us are resistant to the programming.
Technology won't end anyone's privilege. The easier life is, the greater entitlement becomes, always straining for ever greater ease.
Privilege ends when life gets hard, and priorities focus on necessity instead of fickle, hedonistic desire.
E: as a caveat, it is one of the interesting aspects of space travel. Technology actively making life harder.
It really wasn't too bad, until the Frankfurt School's critical theory had sufficient time to spread, permeating American academia by the 60's, and turning youth against tradition and "the System". Especially the impressionable fairer sex. Second wave was pure societal cancer.
I'd be inclined to blame the Lew Rosen's and Samuel Roth's, who really blazed the trails of media degeneracy for those who would follow. The history is long, and while not completely tribal, it's disproportionate.
Ultimately, women are necessary to humanity. May as well rail against water, instead of the assholes pissing in it.
Then stop worrying about the dogs that have been conditioned into this infantile but profitable behavior, and start worrying about those that made this behavior acceptable through the media messages they've been bombarded with all their lives.
Honestly, it's too late for that, though. Carry on with your misguided ramblings against half the population.
The point is to secure public support so that they minimize the backlash when they eliminate the filibuster, expand the SCOTUS, and create 2-4 secure Democrat Senate seats through statehood. By the time the monetary crisis really sets in, they're gambling that they will have permanently secured power. It's a sacrifice they're willing to make.
I think it will end poorly for them.
A lot of New Left folks throughout Europe advocated for the legalization of pedophilia and/or child pornography.
Over time, this will become just "the Left", and that's when opposing it threatens their power. Privately, I'm sure many would love to embrace it, since they've created this New Left, but publicly, they still need centrist support. Enough critical theory and critical race theory in primary school will get them there eventually.
If the last 100 years have taught us anything, it should be that they know patience when prudent.
You're reading a whole lot that isn't there. Military occupation, combined with appointing incompetent people to positions in government that they have no knowledge how to execute, based solely on the color of their skin, is going to create backlash.
You can see that in how the KKK turned from essentially a Confederate Oddfellows group in late 1865, then beginning to shift to a white supremacist vigilante group in April of 1867, about a month after the Reconstruction Act passed, dividing the South into 5 military districts. The generals in command appointed commanders and freed slaves to replace the southern government for 10 years. It was a complete shitshow. Hell, a quarter of the black population starved to death or fell to disease. White southerners didn't have a great deal of agency, other than what they took for themselves. When the authority in charge is incapable (or in this case, maliciously negligent), vigilantism is a natural consequence. The KKK went from a veterans organization to radical terrorists with broad popular support, thanks directly to the actions of the US Congress.
Doesn't really matter how overbearing we find the rules. DoM made the site, like AoV made the sub. They're faggots who despise stormfaggotry. Granted, I don't think we have any actual stormfags here, but anyone who points out an observation along those lines they'll instinctively want to quash. Their prerogative is their right.
Make your own internet.