3
elleand202 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably India. Both Russia and China are demographic time bombs.

1
elleand202 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not Muslims, at least not in the west. It’s jeets and sub-Saharan Africans.

3
elleand202 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t bother with shipping them out, hemp rope is reusable and environmentally friendly.

3
elleand202 3 points ago +3 / -0

She was a leftist lesbian anti-christian white woman, basically every left wing stereotype embodied in one person. I think this result was inevitable given how hysterical the left has been about ICE.

5
elleand202 5 points ago +5 / -0

I remember chatter from democrats during the election from people in Minnesota who were familiar with Walz that he was legitimately retarded. Basically he was supposed to be Kamala’s Joe Biden.

1
elleand202 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it got dismissed. Styz then started gloating about it and got rearrested the next day.

15
elleand202 15 points ago +15 / -0

The apparent backstory is that he's been obsessed with an ex girlfriend who hates him and she recently complained to the police that he illegally discharged a firearm.

13
elleand202 13 points ago +13 / -0

And I think that’s the crux of the problem. Women like the OP have a long list of very high expectations that probably only the top 1% of men meet. (There’s a website that will actually do the statistical calculations but I’m too lazy to plug in her demands.)

The thing that these women don’t understand is that top 1% men are desired by all women, so they can choose whatever woman they want. And this entirely mid Asian woman is not going to be competitive with a hot 10 out of 10 girl that top 1% men get with regularly.

There have been repeated studies that conclude that women routinely overestimate their hotness and also their ability to pair with top men.

6
elleand202 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can’t think of a better place for the FBI to find schizo troons to groom into the next mass shooter.

24
elleand202 24 points ago +24 / -0

This is probably a “water is wet” moment for most people here, but it’s a reminder that these leftists are dangerous. Any armed leftist should be viewed as a potential threat.

As an aside, lolberts are fucking dumb. They’re all up in arms over the SRA being investigated but the SRA types wouldn’t hesitate to toss them in the gulags if they were in charge.

1
elleand202 1 point ago +1 / -0

For those of us living under a rock, which bridge is this and why is it popular for trannies to delete themselves here?

2
elleand202 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the same guy that tried to dox some right wing commentary X account and claimed that it was an alt of Jack Posobiec. I think that he actually has legit connections to the deep state intelligence community, and for that reason, consider him somewhat dangerous.

I consider him to be useful in the sense that he’s a mouthpiece for the intelligence community, so you can see what they want to talk about by seeing what he’s saying.

So in this case, if he’s talking about Russia/Ukraine then the IC is butthurt about the course of the war and/or Trump’s efforts to broker a peace deal.

7
elleand202 7 points ago +7 / -0

By Lisa Lerer and Reid J. Epstein

No wonder they call Fuentes and Carlson white nationalists and antisemites in the article.

2
elleand202 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt the Hyundai employees were even H-1Bs themselves.

They were illegal aliens here under the S. Korean visa waiver program. You cannot work here under a visa waiver status, nor can you stay longer than 90 days. You can be here for business, but not to work. And being here on business means something like attending a sales meeting, visiting a parent company or subsidiary of the company that you work for, etc.

These workers were correctly removed from the U.S.

by SNES_X
2
elleand202 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's being sarcastic you retard.

1
elleand202 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Celebration Parallax may be stated as: “the same fact pattern is either true and glorious or false and scurrilous depending on who states it.” In contemporary speech, on any “controversial” topic—or, to say better, regime priority—the decisive factor is the intent of the speaker. If she can be presumed to be celebrating the phenomenon under discussion, she may shout her approval from the rooftops. If not, he better shut up before someone comes along to shut him up.

source

by SNES_X
5
elleand202 5 points ago +5 / -0

My heckin’ updoots!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›