i'm agreeing and amplifying, not attacking strawmen, my friend. all logic must be proven by being taken to its extremes: if policing any drawing is bad because it could potentially lead to policing the wrong drawings, then policing anything is bad because it could potentially lead to policing the wrong stuff. it's faulty logic, because we as practical reasonable people know that some things must be policed, including pedophiliac material.

as for the part where you would instantly give up free speech once it personally seriously offended you, i stand by that. keep your cool in front of guys free speeching towards your toddler to try to rape them and i'll cede, but we both know that it's not even possible.

now the question is who decides which actions are ok, where the line is, and half a dozen other fronts... if murder isn't okay, suddenly tomorrow walking backwards is a crime!

no, sorry. this logic doesn't compute, it's a dead-end, you end up standing for absolutely nothing and thus standing for everything, including the sickest of our world. you would quit this very logic the moment a man walked up to your toddler daughter and used his free speech to ask her to suck his dick, you'd punch his lights out and suddenly you're the one taking away free speech (after all, he just said some words, he didn't do anything...)

let's solve it this way: when things collapse and the people with the integrity to hate pedophilia (and a million other depraved things) come out on top while you're bickering about your naps and free speech, we can rope the shameless ones and you guys can just kinda slip by and conform, alright? it's a good deal.

equating no longer having spiteful mutants fuck with our media to wanting sexy kids in that media makes about as much sense as lumping any criticism of, say, the CIA, in with flat earth reptillian Q people.

in other words, it's a poisoning of the well, it's pedophillic kookification. "free speech means i get to jack it to kids".

let me tell you something: i don't really approve of all the people wanting women with big tits in every game and show out there. i think it's hedonistic, it depraves society and the character of the consumer, and it's basically adjacent to pornography, which does those former things tenfold.

but, i get it when people say that they want women with big tits. i'm heterosexual, i too like that, and between that and having 400kg negress muttoid abominations in my media, i'll take the japanese women with the big tits.

what i won't ever get is why you would seriously, as a supposedly sane and healthy person, want sexualized little kids in your media. it is only pedophiles that want that, and pedophiles are insane, unhealthy, and deserve the rope. it is that simple. waiting for one to actually abuse a kid when they tell you upfront they're a pedophile (by, for instance, saying they like drawings of sexy naked kids...) is just too stupid to be a natural occurrence among so-called free-thinkers.

and inversely, a small number of competent dissidents can still do a lot of damage to an army when they have God and will to power...

no, he said loli, which is kids.

yea, pornography and rampant hedonism are very republican values...

this pedo apologism shit is so widespread here on kia2 one wonders if it's a psyop.

jacking it to kids: horrendous! how can leftism do this?

jacking it to digital art of kids: wow, stop cramping my style libtard, she COULD be a 900 year old dragon even though i jack it to her because she looks and acts like a kid.

yeah, you're right. who cares if you get off to kids? how does it affect you personally?

your children's children's children will hopefully hear The Myth Of The Jew and go "wow, grandpa, more fairy tales?"

we can get back to killing each other and skyrocketing technology with brother wars after we solve the jew problem. until then, we're all White.

Jesus

was not a jew

we will withhold your payment ben-moshe until you specifically mention White women. the 0.03 shekel will transfer to your account afterwards, thank you for your service brave warrior

does he name em

has to be photoshopped or touched up on, AI doesn't produce guns that accurate usually. though zion don does have 6 fingers there.

well, better than conducting a study to confirm something false..

if you tell them to stop vaping, they'll stab you to death...

Open a fucking Talmud once in your life.

careful what you wish for, rabbi. we wouldn't want the goyim to find the writings on how it's alright to rape three year olds, or how the romans wickedly killed tens of millions of jewish schoolchildren, or how jews should feel free to swindle non-jews, steal from them and keep their lost property, or how Jesus was a brick-worshipper who is now supposedly boiling in excrement in hell, or how if you shoot an arrow at a man and there is a doctor nearby, it's his fault for not going to get stitched up if he dies, so you're not a murderer...

and that's just the stuff i could confirm myself. if you include all the things that the various (((organizations))) swear up and down aren't true but which every jew lives by anyway, the talmud and indeed all of jewish culture both paint a picture you really don't want people finding out.

definitely hitler we're dealing with right now... i expect those kkk demonrats racists to throw up nahtzee salutes any day now !!

they should hire me as chief economist, i know a much cheaper solution: couple m60s and belts of 7.62mm will keep every mexican right out.

i mean, i also support gun violence as long as it targets my opponents. not sure what guns are for otherwise.

the ai cat is already out of the bag. the only way to lessen the negative effects is to make it available to everyone.

any "regulations" are just going to keep this stuff in the hands of the powers that shouldn't be, we know that.

unfortunately you must exterminate the cause, not the symptom, and lord knows that that's a hard sell nowadays...

if White women were supreme, there would have been a nigger genocide ages ago on account of how many women have had to pay tolls.

it's really eye opening to see studies completely contradicting their own conclusions, especially on hot topics like this. you start realizing 99% if not 100% of it is a lie, it totally changes your worldview on how mass psychology and media control works.

i still vividly remember one study saying you had a 0.17% or so chance of catching the flu from an asymptomatic person that you lived with in the same house, then directly and authoritatively saying that asymptomatics are super mega dangerous and will infect everyone just by passing them by on the street if not tested and controlled...

dying light's 2 story sucks, the damage is done