Also I’ve seen plenty of women hit their 30s or 40s and then they want the “sweet guy” they claimed they wanted as a teen
yes, and that perfectly fits with my description of their motives:
once they get older & post-wall, they suddenly become fearful & insecure that they will die alone, therefore they switch from their high-risk bad boy preference to "settling" for their low risk "nice guy with a good paycheck" preference.
lol she's a total bitch & her bf could have knocked her the fuck out without trying.
thing is, this is why you never want to fuck with "alpha" type A personality women. they don't pair bond with you, it's purely transactional. you're only as good as your next win to them. it's the female equivalent of a guy who only dates a woman for the pussy & is 100% prepared to dump her the moment the pussy stops impressing him.
the attraction to "bad boys" is because conformity is a proxy for weakness & submission
rebellion is a proxy for strength & independence
women have a genetic impulse to seek out "future alphas" so they can get in on the ground floor then reap the benefits of their man's rise.
"bad boys" are people who reject societal rules & do as they please. these are the kinds of men who historically would become leaders instead of followers later in life.
it is a high-risk high reward mating preference, thus is adopted by ambitious women who feel secure/safe. since society is very good at making women feel safe & protected now with laws & police, the preference towards bad boys has dramatically increased. I guarantee you that women did not prefer bad boys in the 1800s.
women who feel less ambitious & safe/secure prefer competent beta males. and no, not "beta" the way it is used as an insult today, beta in the true sense of being a successful conformist who avoids risk & takes the surest path to success. it's much safer & smarter to be the #2 guy than the #1.
women in older generations rejected alpha bad boys because they correctly feared that their gamble would not pay off & their life would be ruined.
that's not a concern anymore since these same women just figure if their bet goes against them, they'll get a divorce. most of the consequences & risks associated with bad boys don't exist anymore, hence their meteoric rise in popularity in the dating scene in the last 40 years.
What makes you think that having principles is an advantage? I used to think like this, but an unending string of losses make me more inclined to "do whatever it takes". You can have the best principles, but if you do nothing but lose, it doesn't really matter, does it?
-
"do whatever it takes" on the tactical level to win battles
-
have principles on the strategic level to create a lasting majority
This is how DeSantis fights. See for example how he fights Disney & pledged to ballot harvest. Principles are a weapon you use to entrench your supremacy. It's a way to weaponize being right. They aren't Queensberry Rules you handicap yourself with.
DeSantis seems too good to be true, except on foreign policy. My worry is that a lot of establishment types are backing him. Why? He has not burned his bridges with the establishment, so he can turn on his anti-establisment supporters in a way that Trump cannot.
-
DeSantis foreign policy is Realist like Elbridge Colby. So if you support that, you'd support him. Trump has no meaningful foreign policy except to attempt to "be historic", which is why he will be subject to elite capture on it.
-
DeSantis is openly against the establishment & his relationship with them is strictly "you can support me but I'll give you nothing in return except a ticket to watch my victories". Trump desperately wants the approval of the establishment which is why he constantly talks to the NYT & other lib media personalities.
-
Despite you saying Trump "burned his bridges" he routinely flirts with & kisses up to the Establishment, including taking their side against DeSantis.
-
DeSantis being young means he can bring the Right 30+ years of owning the libs, just like Clarence Thomas.
And you say Lindsey Graham supports Trump. Yes, he does. Probably because he thinks he can manipulate Trump like he did during his first term by ingratiating himself. Neocons got almost everything they wanted out of Trump except a new war.
Roger Stone openly said he manipulated Trump with flattery. It's obvious to everyone that Trump is easy to manipulate as long as you kiss his ass. Trump even praised Gavin Newsom. The Neocons would have a field day with him.
As soon as Trump decided pacifism & isolationism weren't cool anymore, he'd be the biggest warmonger you've ever seen. Trump wants to "go big" on everything he does.
Winning with a Mitt Romney is like losing.
Agree but Romney isn't running, DeSantis is. Dude is like Genghis Khan of the Right. Go to Florida & all you'll hear are the lamentations of their women.
If I'm good enough to be occupied by Americans, I'm good enough to at least comment on politics of Americans, not?
Realists want to end the US occupation of Europe. Unlike you, we see this "occupation" as a scam by which Euros steal $33b per year from the pockets of the US taxpayer. We can't afford to subsidize their social welfare states anymore. Neocons sold us out to Europe so they could get their asses kissed when they vacationed there.
I've also given up on winning. We're up against forces that cannot be defeated. Still, it's worth fighting the good fight, and at least trying to create the conditions where you can win if you estimation of the odds of winning are off.
Even if you are demoralized you have to fight to win, to the bitter end, because you might get an upset & start to turn things around. DeSantis is the one to throw the libs from the walls & lead our counter-attack to drive them before us for the next 8 years.
I've also only heard complaints about funding to Ukraine, but if polls are to be believed, people in my country are utter retards on the issue. I don't know man, maybe people are just stupid.
Some polls are manipulated. Neocons use manipulated polls to exaggerate support for Ukraine in order to use them as talking points to lobby politicians.
And the Republican neocons, who sometimes bash Biden for not doing enough. Unfortunately, they are the people with the power.
Republicans are not neocons. They can be hawks, like Lindsay Graham, but a neocon is a liberal hawk. Conservative hawks are different & have a different vision for how US power ought to be used.
Gay pride bombs = a necon thing that Republican hawks would reject, for example.
I try to be hopeful, but I'm congenitally pessimistic. I think it's just a show, plus some crumbs. The elites have total control over what happens. Sometimes they throw us a bone and then we think the fake steering wheel that they give us and they call 'elections' matter. Of course they don't! You think people in Europe want their farming sector destroyed?
The elites are losing & their power is eroding. JFK Jr is a vehicle for left wing protest against the elites. Both Trump & DeSantis are against the elites in different ways, with DeSantis being far more dangerous to them.
On the grooming issue, polling is against them, and they don't care. Because what people think does not seem to matter at all.
Democrats are arrogant right now because they massively outperformed in 2022. If they get crushed in a red wave in 2024, which they will if its DeSantis, then you'll see them change in a big way.
They'll throw the trannies under the bus so fast your head will spin.
You mean that if we are "selfish" and don't help you fight a war that has nothing to do with us
Of course it does. If China takes over Asia it will fuck over Euro trade just as much as it fucks over US trade. It will totally dictate the terms of trade to both the EU & US in a manner where the trade only benefits China at both of our expense.
BTW, while I do a lot of bravado in saying that "WE WILL NOT FIGHT YOUR WARS", of course I fully realize that the Euros are your slaves and that they will do whatever the USG commands them to do.
I wish that were true, but it isn't, which is why the US needs to pull out of Europe in a big way. We have 100k troops there. We should cut that to 20k & close most bases. Basically just leave a skeleton crew to train with NATO & handle logistics. We need all those troops over in Japan & the Philippines.
I would explain most of it by libs reflexively opposing anything Republicans attack out of partisanship. So since the Right went after this guy hard, the Left starts defending him.
The feds claim that he only called on others to enter the Capitol, and that he never did so himself. Isn't that exactly the kind of behavior you would expect from an agent provocateur?
The Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes basically did the exact same thing but got 18 years in prison.
I do think Congress should call whoever makes the charging decisions for 1/6ers & ask why Ray Epps was not charged. Congress can subpoena records as to whether Ray Epps was ever in contact with the Feds & with Republican control of the House there is no reason why they wouldn't do so.
I support getting to the bottom of this.
Personally though I see it as a dead end & my focus is 100x more on the Biden China bribery scandal we have unfolding right now. Biden ought to be impeached & sent to prison over this & what Hunter was saying to the ChiComs on WhatsApp.
The strategy you said it should follow.
True. The Russians have usually come around to the correct strategy even if they take longer than they should getting there.
The whole Wagner/Bakhmut thing was a total waste of resources so it won't be repeated.
This will leave the war stalemated in the big picture. Sure, there might be some small advances here & there, but nothing big like the early days or the war or Kharkiv or Kherson.
You said General Armageddon (Surovkin) was holding the line defensively and baiting attacks, but that Putin then listened to Gerasimov in attacking Bakhmut (which did not hold, btw, contrary to NYT claims). Now it seems they are absorbing.
Yes Surovkin was right & now Russia is able to hold because he laid the foundation for it. Bakhmut & Prigozhin were wastes of resources. Sure, he technically "took" it as a ruin, but didn't make any progress or gains beyond that, and the cost was so great that Russia won't try to do it again elsewhere.
Neither side has the ability to execute a successful large scale offensive anymore.
Maybe the Russian general staff is reading your comments. Let's hope so, because I want Odessa and Kharkov at the very least.
Hahah I just figure out the obvious answers faster than some other people thanks to a lifetime of reading about military history & being into strategy.
You can't throw them out of power.
You can bc they're all Democrats. A DeSantis Admin would be run by realists like Elbridge Colby, not neocons like [every Ukraine cheerleading think tank].
Just like McCarthy (who otherwise has surprised positively) said that he would not support a 'blank check' but then turned out to be the same old, same old.
I don't believe he has let through any more Ukraine funding since saying that. Biden's Ukraine funding all came from last year before the Republicans took over. There hasn't been any new funding this year. Correct me if you can find a bill in Congress providing it.
This is why Biden had the pentagon claim an "accounting error" to lowball all the value of funding already given - so he could squeeze more into the $113b.
Why? Russia is not bothering me. They're not occupying my country nor controlling my pathetic excuses for leaders.
Maybe not you but most of Europe except for France feels very threatened by Russia.
actual suicides by trannies is a meme
the high stats for tranny suicides is for thoughts & "attempts" not successes
if they actually killed themselves at high rates we wouldn't be seeing their population grow so much.
all the talk of tranny suicide is primarily done as a tool of emotional manipulation to force policy preferences of far left activists. "give me what I want or I'll jump".
That would be a drastic step. I would be very surprised if they read it like that.
It is. My grandparents are Berniebros & they strongly oppose money for Ukraine. I do as well even though I am "far right". $113b was too much, already. The US DIB is in shambles & we are behind the curve on China.
Nobody except the Democrat neocons in the media & think tank classes still want to keep throwing money at Ukraine.
What US taxpayers want is not really relevant though. The whims of the ruling class does.
You're wrong because the Right is increasingly populist. Sure, the Democrats are totally captured by their elites, but not true at all with Republicans anymore.
Democrats, while captured by their elites, are slaves to polling as well, & they won't fight the Republicans on an issue where the polling is against them.
Dragging us into that war as well!?
The selfish Euros won't help with China, which is why the US shouldn't continue to help with Ukraine.
A while back, you were bragging that "Ukraine kept rolling".
I don't think i used those words, but Ukraine was able to make a lot of progress in August-November of last year because Russia neglected defense.
I have not seen any boasts about their recent counteroffensive.
There has been no "counteroffensive", just smaller advances in limited areas.
The traditional idea of a WW2 offensive like D-Day, Stalingrad, Kursk, or Bagration simply are not relevant to this war. Both sides recognize that defense is dominant & that they lack the power to overcome defenses with large scale attacks without taking unacceptable losses.
Russia is no longer neglecting defense, instead, Russia has become extremely paranoid of Ukraine getting breakthroughs & so has invested very very heavily in layers upon layers of defenses.
You may not care, but your ruling class does, and will continue to care.
Neocons care. But they are hated by the American public & will be thrown out of power come 2025.
Ah yes, your dogs that you can set at will on your enemies.
No. Ukraine is a Euro problem. Russia is a Euro problem.
I agree it's strange that Ray Epps wasn't charged, but that doesn't mean he's a Fed.
The pipe bomb threat on J6 is increasingly proving to be an absolute hoax, as a it has been proven that the "pipe bombs" were completely inoperable.
True & we always knew this was bullshit.
the execution of Ashly Babbit (and extreme amounts of defending for that officers extremely malicious and terrible actions)
He should have been fired & charged but libs don't punish people who kill Republicans. Reverse the parties & have it be a white cop shooting an unarmed black woman & you'd have "Saint Floyd" riots & a Chauvin sequel.
Not at all.
Quite frankly as far as I'm concerned, the Ukraine war is basically over - at least for the US.
It's stalemated. Russia can't really accomplish anything offensively, & Ukraine will similarly be able to not accomplish much offensively.
Just like COVID - it's over. It's still there, it's just that nobody is going to care anymore.
At this point Europe can take over supplying Ukraine while the US pivots to China.
No it means giving more than the $113 billion already authorized.
The US is in fiscal crisis & Russia is not a serious threat to Ukraine anymore. US taxpayers don't want to dump billions upon billion more into Ukraine just so it can retake Crimea or whatever.
The Euros can take it from here.
We have much bigger priorities here in America & in dealing with China.
Ray Epps
I read some stuff investigating Ray Epps & it seemed clear enough to me that he wasn't a fed. It's not like the FBI is putting sleeper agents in the US population. There is a reason everyone says they "glow in the dark". The FBI is actually very bad at hiding itself.
Example: the "Patriot Front", which is so laughably obvious & recently got exposed.
If you want to see how Left wing ideology has destroyed the white race condensed into a few seconds of video, this is it.
This man is truly pathetic, & the woke mind virus made him that way.