Programming language used by people who annoy you
You're just stringing words together now.
It's called writing. Seems like you struggle as much with that as you do with reading.
Counting some mechanical failures and accidents
Ah, these are the new euphemisms for when a drone blows up your soldiers? Or when your helicopters become smoking wrecks?
it wasn't Iran that did it. You're up in arms whether it was 0 or 5 that died? That's nuts.
No, dude, it's nuts that you would claim that NO ONE got killed when it's actually 13 (not 5 either). 13 is a different number than 0, as much as your innumeracy matches your illiteracy and your bloodthirst.
And it's only 13 because you fled the entire middle east with your vestigial tails between your legs.
We
You participated? You managed to fit your fat ass through the helicopter door? Astounding. Although it would explain all those 'mechanical failures'.
rescued a guy inside their territory and took no losses except from mechanical failure.
You will believe literally anything. You may as well claim that you took no human losses except for the 13 (a.k.a. 0) who failed due to biological failure... from Iranian shrapnel in their organs.
You guys have completely lost the plot here.
There is no 'you guys'.
Apparently, the very smart CIA viagra-supplied Afghans of yours were too stupid to use American Wunderwaffen.
You're doubling down on "no casualties" and "flying over their country at will"? Dude, you know literally nothing.
When women aren't economically dependent upon their men then they stop fucking them.
Is 'fucking' the problem, or fertility? There seems to be no lack of 'fucking' other than smartphone/social media-induced isolation.
And aren't black women in America most economically dependent on the government, with their men being most likely to be deadbeats? And yet.
If you want women to create children in sufficient numbers to sustain a society then they need to be directly dependent upon the men of their society.
This is a rather negative way of putting "one man should be able to support a family so that the wife doesn't have to work and can take care of the family". Oh, and that children aren't as much of a financial burden as they are today.
As I mentioned, they had advanced defenses from Russia and China. Iran was a modern army.
No, they really didn't, nor would Iranians' inability to use Russian and Chinese weaponry say anything about the inherent quality of those weapons. Remember when the Taliban with AK-47 kicked the ass of your Afghan army armed with state-of-the-art American weaponry?
We decapitated their entire leadership, could fly over their country any time we wanted, and took I think zero casualties doing it.
'I think'. Looks like you didn't think hard enough. Also, just so you know, you were using stand-off munitions because you couldn't fly over their country at all, let alone any time you wanted.
How get a mind, such as it is, get this possessed by propaganda?
You guys shouldn't live in a make-believe world. How does it help you to pretend.
Saint Anthony: There will come a time when people who are mad point at those who are sane and say: you're mad, you're not like us.
That so? How have you acquired this experience of Japan, being a Canadian?
We demonstrated that America can completely destroy a modern military with advanced Russian and Chinese defenses.
What defenses? And what have they exactly destroyed, other than such anti-air as Iran had?
We tilted the global economics in our favor, where every dollar we were spending more in gas I'd say was two dollars into the country
That's an impressive level of delusion, on par with believing that higher housing prices are an asset and not a cost.
And Trump has re-established madman status giving the US much more negotiating power.
He re-established total buffoon status, which decreases US negotiation power even further. Not that I'm complaining, try using it for something good first.
Why would the strings be clipped when all the impeachers are as beholden to Israel as Trump is?
Like Trump, they also say one thing and do the opposite.
You could compare it to the Soviet Union after WW2, although Iran's position isn't nearly as dominant. But in terms of the country being in ruins (Iran less so obviously) but the strategic situation being much improved.
The embarrassment would be comparable to Reagan pulling back the Marines after the 1984 barracks bombing in Lebanon - an admission that the US is too weak to dictate Middle Eastern politics.
Not quite. It'd be a far greater embarrassment, because no vital US interest was at stake in 1984. That's why he was so quick to pull them out. Here, a vital US interest would be at stake, and you'd have to accept its loss anyway.
So will Trump actually concede to Iran a.d try to sell the resulting disaster to the American public?
I doubt most Americans will care. And it's not as if their opinions matters to the powers that be. That said, most of the stuff that Iran wants would also be good for Americans. How does it serve America to sanction Iran? The problem is that the people who do have influence, the warmongers, are universally against it.
So my expectation is that Trump will try to pull tricks on Iran. Maybe stabilize the energy market, make a plan for Hormuz, and then attack again. Or maybe (smarter) renege on the concessions made in the deal, and when Iran retaliates by not upholding its end, claim Iranian ceasefire violations and put into action an actually smart plan.
I would've thought this would be inevitable given the iron grip Netanyahu has on Trump, but now I'm not so sure.
It might seem at a low ebb because Trump trashed him publicly. It might just be for public consumption. Trump is criticized for being Netanyahu's puppet and Netanyahu is criticized for following Trump too much. This benefits both.
You've soured on this war as well? Astonishing.
That would be too obvious. Unless they're co-ordinating with Trump, which I wouldn't put past him, but then he'll never, ever be able to get peace with Iran.
I bet they continue striking Lebanon to bring Iran to the boiling point.
Trump gives them pallets of cash
You mean their own money?
"I don't trust women when they point out that they were raped by migrants." Well, they must love you.
Calm down now, mutt. I bet Europeans have far more spine and self-respect than Americans. Now go whip yourself some more over swavewy.
If it's he said/she said
If it is, the presumption of innocence applies.
Women have no credibility, and have proven time and again that they will weaponize the state against anyone for any reason.
Good thing men never did that.
Glad you cleared that up. The court found that the women were asleep or incapacitated. That clearly makes it not rape. Also, the mom is involved with Jeffrey Epstein, and literally asked his advice on how to raise kids, so yeah...
he denies the rape
That settles it, I guess.
Rest assured, my country isn't overrun by murderers because I'm willing to give people arsenic.
Jewish? What? You're saying that because of his name?
Anyway, I was mocking the media for labeling him white (even though he's clearly not) as soon as they could blame whitey for a fake crime.
I'd probably argue back a bit that most American stadiums don't even have the facility available for everyone there to neatly dispose of their trash
So the Japanese feel right at home.
For them, this is not being respectful, it's just being normal. It's no wonder that Japan is so clean.
Don't call the police if you're being robbed by a black guy, sit down and take it, but a black guy killing someone is a perfectly reasonable response to allegedly being touched and merely reflects 'having boundaries'. Of course, she also brings up Trayvon Martin. So Zimmerman, the white Hispanic, is supposed to NOT have the boundary of "not having his head smashed into the pavement", but a black guy can stab you because of his "boundary" of a white guy (allegdly) touching him to say that he's in the wrong tent. What if non-blacks had these same "boundaries"? If they started killing people for something as innocuous as "this is not your tent", and I'm not saying they should, how many blacks would remain alive?
Black boys are afraid around white people, says this article. Pretty sure it's a lie, but if it were true, then they're very stupid, because they should be afraid of fellow black guys.
Oh, and if you think this is bad... this has thousands of likes. I thought people were exaggerating the support for this killer.
I don't generally support this sort of thing, but Leo Terrell should unironically be unhireable. What is his talent exactly? Being a house nigger for the man? Piss off man.
Also, did he say work with a Jew or work under a Jew. Major difference.
The modern right is more Nietzsche than Nazareth.