It's the same dynamic everywhere. When women aren't economically dependent upon their men then they stop fucking them. You can dress it up and try to make it more palatable but it's the same thing across the globe. If you want women to create children in sufficient numbers to sustain a society then they need to be directly dependent upon the men of their society. We've done too much too abstract away that dependency and allowed them to participate in the economy with pretend jobs to the point where they perceive themselves as no longer dependent.
When women aren't economically dependent upon their men then they stop fucking them.
Is 'fucking' the problem, or fertility? There seems to be no lack of 'fucking' other than smartphone/social media-induced isolation.
And aren't black women in America most economically dependent on the government, with their men being most likely to be deadbeats? And yet.
If you want women to create children in sufficient numbers to sustain a society then they need to be directly dependent upon the men of their society.
This is a rather negative way of putting "one man should be able to support a family so that the wife doesn't have to work and can take care of the family". Oh, and that children aren't as much of a financial burden as they are today.
If she can support her own hedonistic lifestyle without the support of a man then she'll just do that instead of raising a family. Women require boundaries enforced upon them by society at large or else you get the current shit show. This is how every civilization on earth has worked for all of recorded history.
I think you may underestimate the extent to which women want kids. I won't disagree that the hedonistic lifestyle is far too attractive for both men and women though.
That so? How have you acquired this experience of Japan, being a Canadian?
It's the same dynamic everywhere. When women aren't economically dependent upon their men then they stop fucking them. You can dress it up and try to make it more palatable but it's the same thing across the globe. If you want women to create children in sufficient numbers to sustain a society then they need to be directly dependent upon the men of their society. We've done too much too abstract away that dependency and allowed them to participate in the economy with pretend jobs to the point where they perceive themselves as no longer dependent.
Is 'fucking' the problem, or fertility? There seems to be no lack of 'fucking' other than smartphone/social media-induced isolation.
And aren't black women in America most economically dependent on the government, with their men being most likely to be deadbeats? And yet.
This is a rather negative way of putting "one man should be able to support a family so that the wife doesn't have to work and can take care of the family". Oh, and that children aren't as much of a financial burden as they are today.
If she can support her own hedonistic lifestyle without the support of a man then she'll just do that instead of raising a family. Women require boundaries enforced upon them by society at large or else you get the current shit show. This is how every civilization on earth has worked for all of recorded history.
I think you may underestimate the extent to which women want kids. I won't disagree that the hedonistic lifestyle is far too attractive for both men and women though.
YOU'VE NEVER BEEN?