16
acp_k2win 16 points ago +16 / -0

start assuming everything on the internet that doesn't contain nigger is generated by AI

11
acp_k2win 11 points ago +11 / -0

There haven't been any real radical Christians for the last 500 years. The closest we came in more recent history were the proto-commie terrorists like john brown.

7
acp_k2win 7 points ago +7 / -0

"gay people just like you, they just walk around with shit on their dick and have aids"

13
acp_k2win 13 points ago +13 / -0

to summarize: the right thinks the left is retarded so we shouldn't take them seriously, the left thinks the right is evil so any harm they commit against us is justified

guess which side keeps winning

7
acp_k2win 7 points ago +7 / -0

context is king

on this site you can tell the truth

on twitter you stick with the currently within-overton high ground position because that is what moves the zeitgeist in our direction

4
acp_k2win 4 points ago +5 / -1

the primordial linchpin choice is "serve God" or "reject God, and serve yourself"

everything else is downstream from that decision

there are actions/attitudes/decisions that appear to straddle the line from a distance but once you drill down you will see they are either on one side or the other

6
acp_k2win 6 points ago +7 / -1

Maybe an 1800s a feminist was chaste once, but there isn't a feminist in the 21st century that isn't a consummate whore. They might virtue signal about it but they are all getting railed if not daily then at least multiple times a week.

Because that is female nature unleashed and it has to be suppressed by a comprehensive, purpose-built, social framework to keep it in check in order to have a sustainable civilization.

13
acp_k2win 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's funny how their origin story is basically the plot of Mazes and Monsters

29
acp_k2win 29 points ago +29 / -0

I already liked him, you don't have to keep praising him.

2
acp_k2win 2 points ago +2 / -0

games weren't movies you say....

Feast your eyes on THIS! (still better than the sequel trilogy)

13
acp_k2win 13 points ago +14 / -1

We must have a different definition of globalist then. I define it as the intentional weakening of national sovereignty by delegating more and more power and decision making to stateless/international organizations. Along with that the weaking of ethnic identity particularly European and White ethnic identity, primarily through mass immigration and cultural promotion of things like race mixing. Additionally most globalists are at some level anti-Christian and promote anti-Christian practices like "religious freedom" and faggotry.

Summary is globalists think they can make Star Trek happen once they kill off all of those stinky rednecks.

Zionists are less concerned with weakening America, and Europe, than they are with strengthening Israel through expansion, "aid", and using political influence to hide behind America while sniping at their enemies, specifically Iran. They encourage evangelical Christianity which has this retarded conflation of the current nation-state of Israel and jews in general with people of Israel as described in the old testament.

There is certainly overlap. Jewish globalists aren't necessarily anti-Israel but their anti-Americanism also makes it harder for Zionists to marshal America to fight their wars for them. Zionists don't care about any nation other than Israel but don't want their puppet states so weak that they can't serve Israel's needs. Zionists tend to be more religiously observant, globalists are almost universally atheist.

As much as it pains me I would rather live in the US that Ben Shapiro wants than the global Brazil-tier faggot dystopia Soros/Schwab appear to want.

19
acp_k2win 19 points ago +20 / -1

Globalist jews and zionist jews are going for the same destination but taking different paths. Occasionally they will butt heads.

Where they are united is in squashing any White racial consciousness or solidarity and any discussion of or legal diminishing of jewish power.

1
acp_k2win 1 point ago +1 / -0

I played maybe half of the game and the best thing about it was the flying car, so I could just skip travel, skip the obnoxious roadblock battles, and go straight to the slightly more fun open world boss fights and occasional story missions.

29
acp_k2win 29 points ago +29 / -0

IMO gaming peaked with PS2. That was when there was enough budget to give creative people the freedom to make their visions real, but not enough that the industry caught the attention of the MBAs, marketing drones, and HR nags.

There are enough games from that era to fill any adults free time.

Ratchet and Clank 2/3 are kind of amazing.

10
acp_k2win 10 points ago +10 / -0

Requiring bnet login to play Starcraft 2 single player was the nail in the coffin for me. I don't think I bought a single blizzard product after that, though I did keep paying my WoW sub until just after sunwell and I burned out.

You could see the way the wind was blowing and the company flipped from creating great gaming experiences to "how can we best corral these losers to shove our 'important marketing messages' down their throats".

12
acp_k2win 12 points ago +12 / -0

His twitter has been fire the last few months.

9
acp_k2win 9 points ago +10 / -1

And then they threw them in a cage with a bear and an eagle, and then electric floors and rollercoasters and froze them then hit them with a hammer so they shattered into ice cubes like in Tom and Jerry.

You can trust me, look at how big this pile of shoes is.

14
acp_k2win 14 points ago +14 / -0

If the "open world" is just empty spaces between quest markers sure. If it has cool stuff happening between them then that is the point.

Mad Max did a good job of this between storms and random raider encounters.

The main thing is traveling has to be fun, which Mad Max did right. Compared to the retarded Rage 2, which REALLY should have stuck to its scripted FPS formula.

view more: Next ›