Correct. The guy is also however at the end correct about the guards. They blocked him in, then tried to "arrest" to remove him, but did not leave an exit path.
A warning would have been sufficient. "Stop. Wait for the question period. Persist and you will be denied entry and removed."
$5 sale per LFT that are billed to the gov at $55 each. PCR that are billed to the government at $85 each, then you have lab fees, analysts to be paid, the manufacturing companies to be paid, the whole new industries of covid "specific" (titter) safety equipment...
It's 100% about the money now.
Disrespect towards women, is stepping in to help them when they're in need of help, being attacked or merely talked to. /Sarcasmbutnot.
Seriously tho. Don't step in. They asked for police to be disbanded. Realised their mistake and are now asking random civilians to do it instead. All that will happen is they'll be immediately grateful, then find a way to implicate you too.
That does not refute what I said. That is entirely opportunism. They didn't install anyone.
There was already an election going on. They preferred one over the other. They then stacked the deck.
Installing someone means offering up their own client in an election or removing the already in place one.
You really need to understand that difference. The outcome may look the same to you, but it's an entirely different beast.
It's like claiming Biden was installed because the votes were rigged. Biden wasn't installed. He was already in the runnings. They would have stacked the deck in favour of any other candidate they preferred. Which is why we saw the huge push and then sudden candidate flip.
Person A and Person B are fighting over Object 1.
Person C asks person D for a gun, but doesn't say why. Person C gives the gun to their favoured participant.
Person B was not installed or made the victor by Person D. Did they make it easier? Yes.
There's a difference. The CIA saw an opportunity and took it, but that does not mean they installed Pinochet.
I hate it when they use ungrounded percentages.
40% higher. Higher of what? 1.4 is 40% higher than 1.
78% full again of how many...
1 in 5 (the real actual figure that needs to be paid attention to) are "covid" patients, but how many are hospitalised because of serious issues and how many are hospitalised because they're being forced to? How many of them are registered as "covid" patients simply because they have covid like symptoms (when really it could just be flu).
Deaths over a thousand, but doesn't state if those are all deaths recorded (meaning 200 out of 1000 are covid) or if they're adjusted already (meaning 1,000 out of 5000 are covid, in which case we should really ask, what are the other 4000 dying from?)
Aye, not saying you're wrong, just providing an actual source, as we know that Wikipedia is pozzed.
In 1774 the major German literary figure Johann Wolfgang von Goethe published “Die Leiden des Jungen Werthers” (“The Sorrows of Young Werther”) which included a statement that thematically matched the adage under investigation. An English language translation 3 follows the German text: 4
Und ich habe, mein Lieber! wieder bey diesem kleinen Geschäfte gefunden: daß Mißverständnisse und Trägheit vielleicht mehr Irrungen in der Welt machen als List und Bosheit nicht thun. Wenigstens sind die beyden letztern gewiß seltner.
And I have again observed, my dear friend, in this trifling affair, that misunderstandings and neglect occasion more mischief in the world than even malice and wickedness. At all events, the two latter are of less frequent occurrence.
And yes, I'd rather assume evil intent and be pleased it was only neglect/idiocy than expect neglect/idiocy to find out too late, it was evil intent.
Only one of them can be corrected.
The problem I have with Hanlon's Razor is that most people don't realise that the full message is that it's more likely to be Stupidity (not ignorance) than it is malice.
By rewording it to become a never, they're ignoring the chance that things do happen out of malice. Then they act all shocked.
So people get a layman's explanation of this sodium bicarbonate thing. Can it kill covid? Yes. The same way you can die from dihydrogen monoxide poisoning (that's water).
The study doesn't recommend it as an ingested medication because their method of killing covid, with bicarbonate, would kill anything.
They effectively make the ONLY environment around the covid cells, bicarbonate, thus making it impossible for it to live. You could put an entire human in that situation and you would die.
It's not "two teaspoons in water". It's absolutely covering yourself inbicarbonate so you cannot eat, breathe or drink without ingesting lethal amounts.
At the bare minimum it should have been Incitement and Incitement to Cause Terrorism.
Disorderly fuckin conduct... Disorderly conduct is dropping an F bomb in a kids play gym, or decking someone.
Not trying to fuckin start a racially motivated fight/riot.
He means women ofc.
Spidergwen :The movie incoming 2023 bet.