24
WEFFaggotsMustDie 24 points ago +24 / -0

I've noticed in the past year or so, there's been a sudden push to legitimize pseudoscientific claims such as the idea that because brains apparently don't stop forming until you're 25, anyone under that age is basically a child in an adult's body. Despite being debunked, bear pickers are frequently citing this bullshit to try and have society treat them like children for as long as possible and not accountable for their actions.

The age gap thing is just largely jealousy for the most part, even when it comes to genuine instances where it is fairly creepy (i.e. Leo di Caprio). Yes, you can argue what he's doing is disgusting and degenerate by swapping out partners like iPhones every few years instead of being faithful to one and starting a family, especially at his age, but it's certainly not illegal. Those women choose to be with him, either out of fame or gold-digging (or finding him physically attractive, he is a Hollywood hunk after all), and there is nothing any snivelling roastie can do about it.

51
WEFFaggotsMustDie 51 points ago +51 / -0

Yes, Ms. Shields, you got abused by Hollywood, and there are people, including certain groups, whose blame you should be directing yours towards. Instead, you use it as another opportunity to call out an invisible "patriarchy" and shame people who might have even internalized deep-seated aspects of their sexuality (i.e. school uniforms, swimsuits) because of consuming the content you produced when you were younger and didn't know any better.

I didn't see you complain for 40 years over your treatment; only when your looks faded and you started to look busted up, did you decide to start protesting over your past. You just rode the initial wave of fame it brought you, and kept a job on TV or on film because of what you did in the 1970s. You would be completely irrelevant otherwise, and only in the wake of #MeToo and general misandry becoming trendy are you trying to make yourself relevant again. Stop that shit. Call out what and who actually abused you, or shut the fuck up and pick the bear.

19
WEFFaggotsMustDie 19 points ago +19 / -0

Best way to deal with bullies is quite simple.

Firstly, have an older male relative. Brother, cousin, uncle. Father as absolute last resort because of its traceability. If you don't have one, confide in your best friend and see if he has anyone willing to co-operate.

Follow the fucker home, and take note of his address. Then during a weekend, send your relative to stalk the bastard, corner him when he's alone, and get the shit beaten out of him. The bullying will stop, the teachers won't be able to get involved, and if they send the police, just feign ignorance until they go away.

3
WEFFaggotsMustDie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for saying this lol - NOT ONE FUCKING PERSON ON THE PLANET had a problem with the 'Divas' era aside from loud eggless harpies. Even the wrestlers themselves didn't mind it, until years later when they stopped getting booked and started getting real busted, then they suddenly cared.

I will always hate left cunts for taking away my Divas, among many other things.

2
WEFFaggotsMustDie 2 points ago +2 / -0

It can work, but Cena needs to keep up a constant TV presence and fight at least once or twice a month. 2012 is when everyone was getting tired of Super Cena (but not to the point they were in 2014/2015 when they were loudly chanting 'John Cena Sucks' every match he had) and it was right in the middle of his year-long feud with The Rock, so it would have been the perfect time to turn him heel for a couple years.

18
WEFFaggotsMustDie 18 points ago +18 / -0

Honestly? 24 more than needed. Game journos are dead - they said it themselves back in 2014. Now I get all my video game opinions from AndyPants. He's better than any ex-Gawker faggot on the planet by a country mile.

8
WEFFaggotsMustDie 8 points ago +13 / -5

Even if they both agreed to go out together, you wouldn't do something that cruel to a dog. Sounds accidental to me. That's what I'm hoping. If it was pact-related, it's going to tarnish my view of his work, and you can fuck right off if you're going to reply to this with "noooo not the heccin doggos".

6
WEFFaggotsMustDie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those first 20 days were absolutely insane. I'm only just starting to see it again with Trump overwhelming the US government's bureaucracy this time around.

The problem is, back in 2014 we didn't have any media representation and those fucks did. So most of the momentum we'd built up through to the beginning of #NotYourShield was quickly reversed and pushed to its most extreme, right up until "GAMER GIRLS GO HOME" a year or so later.

And by the time we did get public figures on our side, many of them ended up grifters or wishy-washy towards the whole issue. Our only choice was to dive into the many-headed political monster and begin subverting every single elected government in the Western hemisphere for anti-woke populists, which to our credit is working magnificently.

4
WEFFaggotsMustDie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you remember when they took down an article about natural disasters because of the Boston Bombing? That was one of the first signs that Cracked's writers were a bunch of cucks. Then there was the "Top 64" articles from 2012 where the writers who talked about video games hadn't actually PLAYED them, and then they threatened to get rid of the comments section about a year before they actually did.

tbh I'm kind of just reciting a lot of this from Cracked's EncyclopediaDramatica article (probably because I actually wrote it lmao)

12
WEFFaggotsMustDie 12 points ago +12 / -0

Not reading it yet, though it looks good at a glance. Any prospective timeline on GG is incomplete unless it includes the 2 - 3 years of "background". What happened didn't spring up overnight.

Journo outlets such as Cracked gave a platform to views such as Anita's about 2 years before GG happened, and were among the first to give Zoe a soapbox. Zoe herself was already known to /v/ by the end of 2013 because she was involved with a much smaller controversy. Does this timeline mention any of that?

2
WEFFaggotsMustDie 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was crazy how much of a wolf in sheep's clothing ACB turned out to be. Not even Giorgia Meloni did such a dramatic heel-face turn after rising to power.

Together with Kavanaugh, Trump made some horrific choices when it came to doing something very few Presidents are given the ability to do, to load the SC with a new candidate, let alone twice. If he'd made a based selection, the SC would have basically been impenetrable for the next 5 election cycles easy.

It was just one of many, many mistakes that castrated Trump's power during his first term.

3
WEFFaggotsMustDie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Believe me, the early - mid-2010s were a HORRID time to be in college - personal story time.

This was about a year or two before that Mattress Girl (remember that lying bitch?) did her Jussie Smollett act, btw.

For a very brief time, I was part of an extended friend group that all partied in the same dorm out of tradition, about 10 - 20 times a year. Kind of like what you see on shows and movies, but not the stereotypical "beer pong in red cup" parties, we never did shit like that. Just listened to music, discussed our courses, watched sports, played multiplayer games on the fat PS2 that was still going strong, and feasted on take-out. We also had the occasional trips across and out-of-state. It was genuinely fun while it lasted.

To give an idea of how long this thing had been around, the group itself was effectively a "Theseus group". The seniors were originally the freshmen who got introduced to the group in the late '00s, with some of the older guys staying in touch (anyone who stayed in town after graduating would often be at the bar ~5 minutes outside campus, and we'd usually go there anyway). One of the older regulars was in his mid-30s at the time, and I even found a few Usenet posts from the turn of the millennium referencing the exact building. The same dorm had been used for these parties since the late '90s AT LEAST. Whether it was the same or a revival, I'm not too sure. But there were hundreds of stories attached to this one dorm, some good, others not (no killing but a few people did go over a balcony one time). Modern day folklore.

Anyway, I'd been a part of this group for about a year, shared some really good memories. Can't remember the exact year, I know it was around the time GTA V had either been announced or released. It was definitely cold outside.

Two of the seniors (can't remember if they were one or two years older than me) are giggling and cradling these girls around their arms, and I remember their expressions perfectly. Innocent little smiles. No sign of distress in the slightest. Furthermore, these weren't girls they'd just picked up off the street. We'd seen them around each other for weeks, maybe months. If not girlfriends, they were at least fuckbuddies. They take them into the spare bedroom and have a little fun. Out of tradition, we don't disturb them, and think nothing of it for the rest of the night.

Two days later I'm fucking being called to the Dean's office, pulled in the middle of a lecture to give my statement on a "rape incident on campus". I had no idea what the fuck he was on about until he asked "Do you know X and Y?"

"Yeah?"

"They just got busted for drugging and raping (girls). We want to know what you saw."

BULL. FUCKING. SHIT. Everyone who was there could see they weren't coerced into doing jackshit. But they did it because they knew they could. One guy got acquitted, the other did time and wrecked his entire adult life before it even started.

The dorm was shut down for forensic investigation, and when it re-opened, we never came back. The group just silently split one day. Everyone knew why they did it. Jealousy that their men could have a good time around people that wasn't them. In one weekend, they destroyed a friendship group that might have still existed by the time we colonized Mars.

I learned my lesson that day. Stay away from any girl, even if they look inviting. Because the feminism-charged atmosphere of the 2010s told them that they could just scream "RAPE" and everyone would believe them every single time. You'd get your life ruined if you tried engaging with a girl, so just wait until adulthood to make your move.

I will never fucking forgive them for what they did to me. For what they did to us. Every time I see a College party in a film or TV show, there's an irrational anger that grips me. Knowing what I had stolen from me because of the lies of two degenerate whores and society completely blind to any sort of truth.

It's why I wasn't so fucking surprised when GG happened. You can only push young men so far before they reach the point of peak demoralization and fight back.

8
WEFFaggotsMustDie 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wouldn't trust anyone with a username like that for a million years. They could tell me the sky was blue and I'd have to thoroughly check first.

7
WEFFaggotsMustDie 7 points ago +7 / -0

the culprits seem to be Nintendo of America (NoA) and Nintendo of Europe (NoE)

That's two thirds of Nintendo, my good man. Just say Nintendo. Parent company sees no problem with targeting fan games and emulation so it's not like the Japanese arm is a particularly shining paragon of virtue either.

1
WEFFaggotsMustDie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's supposed to just be a generic '80s console largely based on the NES, as the SG-1000 and SMS were both toploaders, as was the Atari 7800.

5
WEFFaggotsMustDie 5 points ago +6 / -1

If I had to hazard a guess from checking my own post history, it's probably because the post (consciously or not) repeats a WEF talking point: the idea of the "walkable city". And if it were up to me, I wouldn't want to endorse any part of WEF doctrine, regardless if it was intentional or not. Because that is basically how our movement started; fake "moderates" saying games should have more diversity and less scantily-clad women without realizing their games could co-exist alongside ours without erasing our "less mature" titles, and us telling them to go bite a curb.

If you're confused as to how "walkable cities" (which if anyone endorses, it's probably because you heard from a WEF-compromised YT channel like NotJustBikes, who funded Keffals with Patreon money if you ever wanted a reason to unsub) is a WEF construct, watch this video. They've been planning this for upwards of 15 years:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSvb_ZTYS6A

You can be in favor of transport choice without forcibly imposing a way in which private transport is effectively outlawed in big cities.

3
WEFFaggotsMustDie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone gets it.

3
WEFFaggotsMustDie 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, that's not the way it works, and I'm tired of seeing posts made on Scored in favor of walkable cities, because if you accept them, you accept the rest of the WEF's rotten dogma. And I know I'm right, because I angered one tiny hat fellow trying to push it so much on my 3 year old account that every single thing I post gets -15 regardless of which board I post it on or when, often jumping back from a +20 or higher score. Either one no-life faggot with alts, or a Trooncord/IDF squadron leader. But I've abandoned that account (just as I'll abandon this one) because I know I've made them squirm.

All of it, every last piece of their doctrine, was highlighted in their Planned-Opolis video, which includes an early form of walkable cities. I have spent 10 years trying to alert people to this video and many continue to ignore it. This is from 2009/2010, and probably was being drawn up well before then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSvb_ZTYS6A

Over the past few years, the WEF figured that walkable cities are the most sore point dividing the online right over bearing arms or eating meat, so are trying to bruteforce their way in and then forcefeed you the rest of their doctrine from there as a soft-sell. It's the same reason as to why a lot of social media accounts shill the "white room with a mattress and TV" minimalism lifestyle, to condition people into thinking living in small blank rooms with nothing in them is normal.

Anyway, the argument at hand.

Yes, some people have stopped using public transit because of the fact more and more "rowdy rebels" are riding it. But that's not even half of the picture.

Private transport took off at the end of WW2 due to a booming economy, convenience, and above all else, feelings of self-sufficiency.

Getting to work on a bus? Sure. Get up at 6:30 for the bus at 7, or oversleep and be forced to get the one at 8. (And that's if the bus doesn't break down or the service just gets flat-out cancelled, which is increasingly common these days).

After 10 stops, get to your destination at 8:50, then walk for 15 minutes so you clock in at 9:05. Do your business, then spend the last hour subconsciously planning your exit get on the bus home at 17:20 or whenever. Work hold you back? Too bad buddy. Diarrhea cause you to miss that bus? Oof, best carry some Pepto-Bismol around next time. Someone invite you to a party or other gathering? Best start learning the local bus routes or throw in the towel and call a taxi at the end of the night.

Or wake up at 7:30 with zero stress, have something to eat, get dressed and freshened up, start your car at 8:15, drive quietly for 30 minutes to reach work for 8:45, clock in at 9, have a productive day, go home at 17:00 on the bell, and have a few extra hours of leisure and exercise once you get home.

6
WEFFaggotsMustDie 6 points ago +6 / -0

r/SquaredCircle

Found your problem. One of the worst boards to be compromised by the leftist menace.

24
WEFFaggotsMustDie 24 points ago +24 / -0

Add 20 to the blue side, take away 20 from the red side. That's a far more realistic reading.

7
WEFFaggotsMustDie 7 points ago +7 / -0

Whatever, nigger apologist.

No nip burned down my city and attacked my people because a low-level yak choked on his sake in the presence of a cop.

view more: ‹ Prev