3
VeryFinePerson69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course you need consent of your husband, it's his child too. Just like if you wanted to sell your house you need to get a signature from your husband as well.

0
VeryFinePerson69 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're all falling for it, there is no executive order that says people can't put a pronoun in their bio, that would be in violation of First Amendment, government can't tell people what they're allowed to write in their own biographies

2
VeryFinePerson69 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to be pro "marriage equality" for libertarian reasons. I've changed my view on this as I now see marriage as a purely cultural phenomenon that has nothing to do with your rights as an individual or a citizen. Married and unmarried people already have equal rights in society. As an unmarried person myself, I am not oppressed or limited in any way. There is nothing I can't do that only a married person can do, and if there was, then that should be permissible for unmarried people as well. So the whole idea of marriage equality is based on the premise that unmarried people can be discriminated against. Counterexample: if indigenous people have some special ceremony of cultural recognition within their culture, that doesn't mean I am entitled to be part of it. It's a purely cultural institution and those can be arbitrary and exclusive, otherwise nobody could have any culture because all cultures would have to be inclusive of every other culture.

8
VeryFinePerson69 8 points ago +8 / -0

They do when the Christians are sanctifying drag shows and George Floyd.

I think those are the fake atheist Christians who are doing that. I think they've infiltrated many churches. For example the Church of England flies the child mutilation chevron symbol and performs wedding ceremonies for gay men who kiss in the church "you may now kiss the husband" 🤢 These people hang out at Reddit r/Christian or r/Christianity

2
VeryFinePerson69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok I will turn my cats into cat food for other animals then, happy?

3
VeryFinePerson69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure it's cause the left happens to be anti Israel / pro Palestine

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice how the rapist bitch rephrased "medical consent" as "vaccine mandate bans". Trying to say only the left can support medical consent — the very same group who were against it.

7
VeryFinePerson69 7 points ago +7 / -0

In the first few seconds of the video she says she agrees with the 200 immigrants being dumped in their small town just not all in the one place. What a joke, she absolutely deserves the consequences of that. Or possibly she's saying that to try and avoid being called racist.

4
VeryFinePerson69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct response

In the article he says the MSM isn't lying, but rather the issue is that nobody believes them anymore. Taken to its logical conclusion, this means consumers must therefore be stupid for not believing the MSM's true claims. Then he proceeds to shit all over podcasters and social media news channels, saying they are beneath the MSM due to misinformation.

3
VeryFinePerson69 3 points ago +3 / -0

The creator doesn't believe in gender identity and said stuff like he's going to change the name of the game to Dominus because that's it's new identity and anyone who continues to use its deadname Domina will be banned. Very benign criticism of gender identity.

5
VeryFinePerson69 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was reading about Domina ... fuck Steam, fuck Gabe. They can go jump in the lake of fire for all I care. Disgusting commie child mutilators conspiring to have people removed from their jobs for refusing to endorse conversion therapy for kids.. They want to hate and criticise others on a range of issues that suits them, but if you dare criticise conversion therapy, even in a PG13 way, Gabe has his goons remove you from your source of income. Fuck the lot of them. They deserve a very severe punishment while I eat a nice hot meal and watch them suffer.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump will do mass deportations and its gonna be glorious. If he doesn't, I'll throw him under the bus so fast.

0
VeryFinePerson69 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok let's say it's only a small detail whether 🐪a or Trump wins. But the details matter! As the saying goes, the devil is in the details.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't get too confident. You should prepare yourself for the very real possibility of a Kamala government. Don't fall into the trap of thinking the real world reflects what we see online in our echo chambers. There are millions upon millions upon millions of Democrat voters out there who WILL be voting Kamala. Go into their online spaces like Reddit and MSNBC YouTube channel and have a look at how much support they've actually got. Our "Kamala is a joke" attitude is matched by their "never Trump" attitude. Our disbelief that Kamala could be presidential material is matched by their disbelief at Trump. We live in different worlds. Biden won against Trump* and that was without J6 flipping a whole bunch of fence sitters / nonvoters. They also have millions of additional migrants since then who will largely be voting Harris. Nick Fuentes isn't voting Trump and wants Harris to win so things can get super fucked up and provoke a backlash 4 years from now. I think that's the wrong move strategically. Once they get more migrants into the swing states it's game over. *officially

5
VeryFinePerson69 5 points ago +6 / -1

The self-loathing Trump-deranged Michael Moore put it best: Trump is like a Molotov being thrown at the system. That's why people love him. That's where the cult of personality comes from. He has no filter.

15
VeryFinePerson69 15 points ago +16 / -1

I totally understand if you don't want to endorse Trump, but you should use him as a temporary stop gap so that in 4 years time you'll be in a position to elect someone better. Otherwise Kamala gon dump migrants in swing states and your chances will be much lower, possibly zero.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +7 / -6

Actually I've changed my opinion on this. I used to think nonvoting was stupid because it just allows your opponent to win. But if enough people don't vote, then in 4 years time — which is relatively short in the grand scale of things — the losing party will remember they lost the previous election due to nonvotes and be motivated to change their policies. I believe Jimmy Dore is doing this but not 100% sure.

That said, the Democrats would wreck America so inconceivably beyond repair if given another 4 years. As Musk says, it would be "the last election" because they'll just start dumping migrants into the battleground states and you'll never win those states ever again. So this election is special and I would say a vote for Trump is mandatory even if you hate him, if only to save America so that in 4 years time you'll at least have another shot. If you don't vote Trump, you might not have another shot in future.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already said omnivore diet is the nutritional IDEAL cause we inherited the biology for it from our ancestors but it's not a REQUIREMENT as proven by the fact I am alive and well. The Bible doesn't say animals shouldn't use self defence when attacked otherwise God would have just created them defenceless. So animal defence should be morally permissible too.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was after the fall of man tho. Why did humans start eating animals after the fall?

view more: Next ›