3
VeryFinePerson69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure it's cause the left happens to be anti Israel / pro Palestine

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice how the rapist bitch rephrased "medical consent" as "vaccine mandate bans". Trying to say only the left can support medical consent — the very same group who were against it.

7
VeryFinePerson69 7 points ago +7 / -0

In the first few seconds of the video she says she agrees with the 200 immigrants being dumped in their small town just not all in the one place. What a joke, she absolutely deserves the consequences of that. Or possibly she's saying that to try and avoid being called racist.

4
VeryFinePerson69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct response

In the article he says the MSM isn't lying, but rather the issue is that nobody believes them anymore. Taken to its logical conclusion, this means consumers must therefore be stupid for not believing the MSM's true claims. Then he proceeds to shit all over podcasters and social media news channels, saying they are beneath the MSM due to misinformation.

3
VeryFinePerson69 3 points ago +3 / -0

The creator doesn't believe in gender identity and said stuff like he's going to change the name of the game to Dominus because that's it's new identity and anyone who continues to use its deadname Domina will be banned. Very benign criticism of gender identity.

5
VeryFinePerson69 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was reading about Domina ... fuck Steam, fuck Gabe. They can go jump in the lake of fire for all I care. Disgusting commie child mutilators conspiring to have people removed from their jobs for refusing to endorse conversion therapy for kids.. They want to hate and criticise others on a range of issues that suits them, but if you dare criticise conversion therapy, even in a PG13 way, Gabe has his goons remove you from your source of income. Fuck the lot of them. They deserve a very severe punishment while I eat a nice hot meal and watch them suffer.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump will do mass deportations and its gonna be glorious. If he doesn't, I'll throw him under the bus so fast.

0
VeryFinePerson69 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok let's say it's only a small detail whether 🐊a or Trump wins. But the details matter! As the saying goes, the devil is in the details.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't get too confident. You should prepare yourself for the very real possibility of a Kamala government. Don't fall into the trap of thinking the real world reflects what we see online in our echo chambers. There are millions upon millions upon millions of Democrat voters out there who WILL be voting Kamala. Go into their online spaces like Reddit and MSNBC YouTube channel and have a look at how much support they've actually got. Our "Kamala is a joke" attitude is matched by their "never Trump" attitude. Our disbelief that Kamala could be presidential material is matched by their disbelief at Trump. We live in different worlds. Biden won against Trump* and that was without J6 flipping a whole bunch of fence sitters / nonvoters. They also have millions of additional migrants since then who will largely be voting Harris. Nick Fuentes isn't voting Trump and wants Harris to win so things can get super fucked up and provoke a backlash 4 years from now. I think that's the wrong move strategically. Once they get more migrants into the swing states it's game over. *officially

5
VeryFinePerson69 5 points ago +6 / -1

The self-loathing Trump-deranged Michael Moore put it best: Trump is like a Molotov being thrown at the system. That's why people love him. That's where the cult of personality comes from. He has no filter.

15
VeryFinePerson69 15 points ago +16 / -1

I totally understand if you don't want to endorse Trump, but you should use him as a temporary stop gap so that in 4 years time you'll be in a position to elect someone better. Otherwise Kamala gon dump migrants in swing states and your chances will be much lower, possibly zero.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +7 / -6

Actually I've changed my opinion on this. I used to think nonvoting was stupid because it just allows your opponent to win. But if enough people don't vote, then in 4 years time — which is relatively short in the grand scale of things — the losing party will remember they lost the previous election due to nonvotes and be motivated to change their policies. I believe Jimmy Dore is doing this but not 100% sure.

That said, the Democrats would wreck America so inconceivably beyond repair if given another 4 years. As Musk says, it would be "the last election" because they'll just start dumping migrants into the battleground states and you'll never win those states ever again. So this election is special and I would say a vote for Trump is mandatory even if you hate him, if only to save America so that in 4 years time you'll at least have another shot. If you don't vote Trump, you might not have another shot in future.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already said omnivore diet is the nutritional IDEAL cause we inherited the biology for it from our ancestors but it's not a REQUIREMENT as proven by the fact I am alive and well. The Bible doesn't say animals shouldn't use self defence when attacked otherwise God would have just created them defenceless. So animal defence should be morally permissible too.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was after the fall of man tho. Why did humans start eating animals after the fall?

0
VeryFinePerson69 0 points ago +1 / -1

Humans weren't originally omnivores in the garden of Eden and the Bible says in the end the wolf will live with the lamb so you better get used to not eating animals in eternity. It's only this relatively short period of time on Earth that you will be eating them. There are no slaughterhouses in heaven. It was only after the fall of man that humans were given permission to eat animals, and permission isn't the same as an ideal. I can give my kids permission to eat yummy food but that doesn't mean I'm recommending it as the ideal. I'm talking in terms of moral ideals here — I'm well aware the omnivore diet is the biological ideal in terms of bioavailability of nutrients due to probably evolutionary reasons to do with what our ancestors ate. But this doesn't entail it's the moral ideal.

I have no problem with you eating carnivores as they're going to inevitably kill a whole bunch of peaceful nonaggressive herbivores so the rule of self defence applies, it would be a righteous preemptive killing in self defence. Carnivorous cats and dogs shouldn't be exempt from this on the basis "they're our friends so they get special status" cause the vast majority of people are NOT pet owners and are NOT their friends, otherwise a minority could befriend cows and then we couldn't eat cows anymore, plus the whole thing is an appeal to population fallacy anyway. When I try to help stray cats I feed them artificial kibble which contains synthetic supplements. These haven't been proven broadly but it's better than killing them, I would rather be a bit malnourished than dead. You hate me cause I think animal lives matter, stop being so demonic please. Like I said you wouldn't get angry if an animal defended their own life so why care if I defend them. Just calm down bro.

1
VeryFinePerson69 1 point ago +2 / -1

Difference of opinion doesn't automatically mean troll , but I am flattered ðŸĪ—

-1
VeryFinePerson69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

The fact they're cautious of being eaten by other animals proves my point that they don't like to be eaten, which was the basis for the point I was making there, which you conveniently omitted from my quote there, aka lying by omission — nice one bro I really appreciated that 👍

And no they wont die on a vegan diet for the same reason humans wont die despite us being natural omnivores.

Look man, I've got to warn you this isn't going to be an easy debate to win despite how much you just know you are right in your own head. Because at the end of the day your conclusion is going to be "therefore I get to kill you" and this is going to carry a much higher burden of proof than typical claims due to the high potential for disaster if the conclusion turned out to be wrong. In your mind you think this is going to be an easy victory because hey look all of society has been doing it for a million years and I'm just some stupid minority who does things differently but might I remind you that society also thinks abortion is ok. Similarities with human pro life movement:

  • Believes it's murder and can't believe society thinks it's all fine

  • Thinks people should avoid committing said murder by resisting their carnal temptations

  • Notices how quickly people turn into angry demons when told they're not allowed to kill anymore

  • Protests outside the killing facilities

  • Knows Bible verses supporting their belief

-14
VeryFinePerson69 -14 points ago +1 / -15

You don't need to be angry at me for the same reason you don't need to be angry at animals when they try to defend their own lives from predators. They're just trying to survive and you can't really blame them for that.

-23
VeryFinePerson69 -23 points ago +1 / -24

There aren't any vegan symbols in the image, you're trying to associate LGBT with pro life for animals which have nothing to do with each other. Most people on the left hate being told they can't eat their animalbased goyslop anymore and will turn into angry demons when told they're not allowed to kill any more just like they do with abortion. I don't want to be vegan either, I would rather have freedom to eat any food but we can't always do what we like. I'm pretty sure that if cats understood that eating other animals meant that other animals could eat them, they wouldn't like it.