This apparently worked up until February or so I heard. Biden is making them check.
How long ago?
I guess sneaking over the border might be the thing to do if I really wanted to.
Yeah, it seems that way. That's very disappointing for me because I'm single, early 30s and pretty much at my peak but the women in this country are trash. I'd like to go to central america and search for a wife but I can't do that. I'm basically trapped in this country alone and miserable.
Even if I got a job in Florida, it would be a huge hassle and large cost to get there which is ridiculous. Assuming I can even manage to get there.
Wait... So they don't even know it's hepatitis but are calling it that because of the symptoms? That's like saying we're seeing cases of AIDs increase cause someone had a body rash wtf.
Women are not on my side and never can be. Any man who supports women in roles outside of the home are only working against their own interests. But I guess it depends what everyone's objective. Why does politics matter to you? You want a dopamine high for reading some owning on degenerate social media? Then yeah let the whores fight each other and get your next hit of narcotics. I for one will only be happy when we've reestablished the patriarchal imperium and women are regarded as nothing more than my prize. But to each their own obviously.
Taking gender out of the equation, I think the naturally tendency of all humans is to advocate for free speech when such speech tends to benefit them and people are against free speech when such speech goes against them.
Take for example all these leftists on social media that advocate for censorship. They only do so because right now the power and flow of society benefits them. If tomorrow all of a sudden National Socialists were in power and censoring leftists you would immediately see a flip where the leftists would start screaming for free speech.
There are only a few people that always advocate for free speech at all times and it's usually only because these people were once oppressed because of their speech so they understand the dangers of ever censoring speech. That would be say the founding fathers of the USA who understood the dangers of the British and Catholic Church censoring speech because it hurt them so they advocated with free speech and when they had the power to censor speech they chose instead not to censor because they had experienced first hand the problems of censorship. They then tried to instill those values in Americans and that worked for a while but now too many people living today no longer understand the issues of censoring speech. They don't fathom that one day it could be them being censored. They think they'll always be in the right because we're at the dawn of a new age of humanity or whatever. The lessons of the past have been forgotten and the people are naive.
How does this apply to women? Well, women are benefiting the most between the sexes by a significant margin. This means women will be more likely to advocate for censorship because they see less problems with it and the censorship is benefiting women far more than men. If for example our society was censoring women from insulting men, censoring feminists from suggesting women are equal to men, censoring women who speak disrespectfully to a man, or censoring groups that promoted women in the workforce, in slutdom etc... And the censorship was benefiting men over women, you would see less women advocate for censorship.
I also think there is a natural lean where holding all else constant, women prefer censorship than men. The reason for this comes down to the fact that men are stronger, smarter and more capable than women. That means men have less to fear from the free speech of others because men have more power on an individual basis to ensure the free speech of others doesn't negatively impact them. Women have less individual power than men so therefore are always more threatened by the free speech of others, most especially men. This creates a naturally lean where women always prefer censorship over free speech.
Between the two factor, we see a large descrepency between the two sexes.
Exactly. Were she never obese, she may never have developed the problems.
Let me just post this here for the losers.
Family History. Weinberg Name Meaning. German and Jewish (Ashkenazic): habitational name from a place called Weinberg or Weinberge, of which there are numerous examples, especially in Austria and Bavaria. Jewish (Ashkenazic): ornamental name from German Wein ‘wine’ + Berg ‘mountain’, ‘hill’.
San Francisco isn't real progressive policies. Those damn Republicans fucked everything up. Next time we'll get real progressive policies and you'll see, it'll be a utopia!
Everything is unrealistic in a political sense. None of our ideas will be realized.
I mean, it starts to get a little trickier in modern society. Why are my tax dollars going toward welfare for black people? I only want welfare to go toward white people... same for healthcare and everything etc... This is IMO an argument for why all government funded social programs are unjust.
I think you underestimate your own knowledge of the subject and overestimate everyone else's. Many people are still in denial about the truth.
I'm not against voluntary associations just against people forcing themselves on others on the grounds of discrimination if they are not welcomed.
So for example if I say you can't shop here because you're black. That's fine. If you say I have to serve you because it's a hate crime not to serve you because you're black, that's a problem.
Speaking of "banned books" You guys ever see the list of Red Flag Books that Female Dating Strategies tells women to stay away from guys who have these books?
Some of my favorite mentions:
Thus Spoke Zarathustra - Nietzsche
The 48 Laws of Power - Robert Greene
Meditations - Marcus Aurelius
Revolt Against the Modern World - Julius Evola
Bronze Age Mindset- Bronze aged pervert
The New Encycopedia of Modern Bodybuilding - Arnold Schwarzenegger
The Rational Male- Rollo Tomassi
12 Rules for Life- Jordan Peterson
And and... wait for it...
Guys to watch out for if they follow on social media:
elonmusk
This is honestly the only book I can think of besides Mein Kampf that would cause a leftist, if he recognized the book, to get super triggered.
The entire purpose of burning it was to prove a point that the muslims proved. Sweden has no freedom of speech when those who threaten to use violence over your speech have all the power.
I don't like discussing race on this sub cause the mods are sensitive but I'll give it a shot, maybe they'll listen to my name...
Segregation is how we operate. We're already going toward this end but haven't realized it yet. Black movies, black businesses, black culture. black music etc... How do you think Chinese people operate when they come into a foreign city? They setup their China town, their friends kids all are friends with their friends kids, same schools, shop at same local businesses etc... Hell, even white or jewish democrats and liberals that push integration then go and move to a 96% white neighborhood. People don't truly want integration and if they do want it people should be allowed to want it at their own pace rather than have it rammed down their throats by governments.
Step 1: Repeal the Civil Rights Act.
Forced integration is a failure IMO and actually harms everyone in the process. Right now it is harming whites the most. This whole D&I crap seems to be nothing more than punishment for white people. This is how larger nations functioned for centuries. The X race would stick to their side, the Y race to their side. Everyone is happy. If the country is under attack they maybe join forces for a time etc...
If we actually stopped pushing forced integration and let different groups naturally segregate, I think everyone would be better off in the long run.
Could also be due to racial factors regarding the racial makeup of East vs. West along with the impacts of the war of demographics. The Germans were humiliated after the war with Jews pushing black marriages on the women. Tons of rape from non Germans etc... Still an interesting study but still with potential flaws unless those variables were hammered out. Still, is that 1 standard deviation the 20%? Though that would imply more like 33%+.
Personally, I happen to think it's more like 50/50. Nature should not be so easily discounted by most people.
She must have watched him...
I believe he's telling the truth.
Violence itself is a natural trait also. So it's one of those "violence may cause it but genetics cause the violence that causes it". Malnutrition is going to have a factor of course because then people genetics can't properly develop. I think a lot of the modern research on this though is not done fairly. Example: A country like Canada only really has black people because Canada immigrated in black people. Canada has standards for black people that immigrate in this Canada will only accept on average higher IQ blacks as part of its normal immigration process. To then compare Canadian blacks as well-nourished and then compare them to blacks back in their home country who are malnourished is going to give a highly biased result. Of course the Canadian blacks have higher IQ because they were filtered out specifically for their higher IQ as part of the immigration process.
If you take black people in the same country who are well-nourished vs. those who are not, you're again creating a bias because generally speaking the people with better genetics are going to end up getting more nourishment as a factor of their better genetics. Better genetics leading to them being more capable to get into position where they can get more resources and being born to families of superior genetics that have more resources etc...
To truly do an unbiased study, you need to essentially find a village that split into two randomly. The one village go good nourishment and the other village did not. Then compare IQs but that's not how a lot of the studies on nourishment are done. The way in which the studies are done, often lead to a lot of biases in them. However since nourishment advocates the "environment" angle, despite the flaws, it is pushed heavily by many in the field.
You didn't specify the kids and kid IQ ratings are notorious for fluctuating. We'll see the true impacts in a decade. It's still early to draw conclusions.
If I kill Trudeau, I think that might make it hard for me to leave. But yeah, I get your point.