This is true. Still, most men are way less picky than women suggest. The amount of men ruined by porn is very small. It's women who tend to have unrealistic expectations warped by porn.
Women complain about men's "unrealistic" standards due to porn because women get with a guy who already finds them attractive then the guy wants her to try things he's seen on porn. The woman doesn't want to do those things and that creates conflict. The woman then gets made that porn has warped the guys mind because she imagined if he never saw porn he wouldn't want her to do those things.
Women on the other hand will not find a man attractive because he doesn't live up to standards she thinks she can expect because of porn. You'd be shocked at how many young women don't understand men can't instantly get hard and they get mad if he doesn't or can't last or fuck them at super speed nonstop super rough etc... and lots of young men knowing women have these expectations are dropping Cialis and Viagra when they sleep with women because they feel pressured into it. The problem with this though is that women won't give men chances to develop the relationship. If the man doesn't perform as king pornstar from the first time they have sex, she's already done with him (bad sexual compatibility) and she's out hunting for the next pornstar. Young women into porn don't realize the time and effort it truly can take to develop emotional connections and then work on developing some comfortability with the other person such that they can mutually woke on improving the sex. They expect it all from the start. This prevents relationships from developing.
It is exceptionally rare for men to decide not to be with a woman because she didn't perform like a pornstar on day 1. Guys just want to see women who are eager to please men so if he says he wants her to suck his dick and she says sorry, I'm not into that because my pastor said blowjobs are unholy and my feminist friend said blowjobs are demeaning to women, he's going to walk. However porn might lead the guy to developing some odd fetishes but if they aren't crazy, it really shouldn't be outside the realm of something a woman should consider doing for her BF. The fact women get mad at porn because their BF doesn't just want vanilla sex is kind of selfish. At least these men still find the women attractive even if she's not a pornstar unlike the women who have too high of expectations in men now. There's are some outliers where the guys like you have to shit on my face while I wear a diaper or we can't be together which is just fucked but that's a really fucking small minority and guys with those types of niche fetishes can sometimes find women into them too.
I always get a chuckle at "conservatives" that think women are in the fight politically with them. Women don't belong... ... ... And if you don't agree... You aren't a conservative. Simple stuff people.
Fair but also, there's tons of women out there who are into that. I've slept with dozens of women and outside of Asia, I've never seen a woman with a bush. Most girls tell me to fuck their ass and I'm the one who has to tell them no. And every threesome I've been in has been initiated by the woman who wanted one so.... yeah. I agree those are unrealistic expectations but they're so prevalent among women, if a guy wants the above he might as well look for it because he'll find it.
I've yet to meet a woman who won't wear latex if asked to and gifted the latex. I mean, once she finds out how much the latex costs she'll be right into it as long as she's being gifted the outfits.
Elaborate?
The issue is that women's demands for standards in men are too high such that this leads to a reduction in demand by women for men which is causing the imbalance. The statistics on online dating show this. Men rate women /10 in a perfect normal bell curve as it should be. Women on the other hand rate men basically such that like 10% of men are 9-10/10 and 80% of men are <5 and 10% are inbetween 5-9. It's a fucked up exponential-like curve. And that's 5/10 women rating men like this. That's what's causing the imbalance. Women's perception of men is unrealistic.
Yes but it's not just about her perception of her appearance but the main point is actually her perception of where she stands on the overall social hierarchy. u/marsupialLarge kind of alludes to it but seems to think it's about the mid chick finally getting the opportunity to cutdown some guy. No, the women cutdown the guy hard because she's scared of others perceiving her social status as being equivalent to the man who she perceives as not having high enough social status to want to be seen as being equal to. Hot women don't have as much fear of their social status being ruined by ugly men hitting on them because the hot women understand they're so hot no one would think the lower social status man has a chance with her and even if she gave him that chance, her social status wouldn't be impacted. The mid women fear that the lower status men will drag their social status down and overreact in cutting these men down as a defense mechanism and in an attempt to signal their status superiority to high status people.
That has been my observation anyhow. I think it has less to do with appearance/looks and more to do with perceived "social status" more than anything. Mid women are insecure about their status and want to be perceived as being high status. Looks obviously correlates with social status and especially for women. The men women can attract also correlates to status. But it's not really about appearance so much as it is about status.
They'll use the correct version in the completely wrong way in which they should and then gimp the consumer product so no one can actually do good with it. Sounds about right.
$100b to build a Super AI that they'll gimp with their leftist programming. Nice.
Based centrist. That's a laugh. Next you'll be like trad feminist.
Exactly. Banking is pretty much an arm of the government now.
Considering women do this for dating, it wouldn't shock me. This sounds like exactly something women would do.
Canadian so even worse than Cali. Yes, there is a huge difference between a Canadian's experience and an Americans when it comes to these stats. America is probably the only place in the Western hemisphere that isn't entirely fucked.
I remember when I went on a date with this Hawaiian girl and she was telling me about her best friend, a White girl, who only dated black men. She showed me pics. Girl was hot and yeah, all the pics with her and men were almost all black guys. But you know what? It wouldn't shock me to learn she married a white guy just like yourself. Then you'll interpret the stats as "she's a heckin loyal huite woman!"
You seem to make the assumption that if not for the internet, I would never come to these conclusions except it is dating women that actually led me to come to these conclusions not the internet. It's your interpretation of the stats that would indicate limited in-world experience.
Once you understand what the propaganda is trying to tell you and for what reason, it becomes easier to see what is and isn't propaganda. You can't see it yet because you don't recognize what is and isn't propaganda. Once you see it for what it truly is then you can tell what sources are legitimate and what sources are just pushing the propaganda. And sometimes the propaganda tells the truth, it's not all lies. Sometimes those who aren't peddling propaganda tell lies also. This all becomes easier to evaluate though once you can see what is clearly designed as propaganda though.
This is definitely one angle. Another angle though is that women chase "Chad" when they are young but Chad only wanted her around for sex. At first she maybe didn't realize that but eventually it became obvious when she was only getting calls for sex, when the second she stopped wanting to have sex she stopped getting calls and whatever other signals made it apparent. The women though, wanted Chad to love her for her and to be valued for something more than sex. The women though were going for the wrong men. It would be like if men who wanted housewives kept going for prostitutes and then wondering why it wasn't working out. These women who went for Chad and only got used for sex then starts to see all men who want sex as being the same as Chad who pump-and-dumped her so she starts looking for men who don't like her for sex. Of course, the problem though is that all men like women for sex and ironically, the non-Chads are the guys getting sex the least so sex is more on their mind than Chad because they're desperate from not getting sex since young girls chase Chad not non-Chad (just like her when she was younger). So now, these men who might actually be good boyfriends who would love and care for the woman forever unlike Chad are getting passed over by women simply because these men really value sex since they aren't getting sex since these women never slept with these non-Chads and these women are mistakenly attributing the fact these men want sex to mean these men are just like Chad who only ever valued her for sex.
The system is broken. Women are the cause of it and they could be the solution but they choose not to be.
I understand the issue of simps enabling women by their simping; however, there's more to it than that. Even if men were entirely not willing to put up with a woman's shit, we'd still have many of the same problems though the overall situation might be slightly different. Simps are a problem but they're also a symptoms of the overall system. The system itself needs to change.
Women don't struggle to make men content. As you say, it's easy to do. If all a woman wanted to do was make a man content, she could easily do it. Women struggle to make themselves content and that's no easy task.
Men's actual standards in women:
- Don't be fat
- Enjoy having sex
- Don't be annoying
That's about it. Sadly, only 30% of women aren't fat. Most women seem to think men liking sex is an insult to the woman or something. And don't be annoying is probably the hardest thing for a woman to do. All she has to do is literally shut up but they just can't help themselves and when they learn the man finds them annoying they get insulted at that knowledge that they could possibly be annoying which makes them become even more annoying.
A kid in 5th grade could have made something funnier.
It has got to the point that only poorly programmed hobby games actually have characters and stories anyone actually wants.
This makes a lot of sense actually. And feminists that want to destroy what men like.
Yes, exactly. It's like telling a slut she's supposed to be monogamous then act surprised when she cheats on you.
Trump isn't selling a bible. Lee Greenwood is. Trump just endorsed it. Of course, you'd never know that if you get your news from CNN.