Is there a conservative journolist equivalent? Probably yes
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I mean, she is a big ugly coalburner. Hasn’t she done enough to ruin her own reputation?
Is this possible? Absolutely.
Am I going to trust anything from, or drama started by, a shit disturbing grifter like Pearl? Nope.
I've noticed the same people commenting on the same things with the same thing. First was gg2 , second was the crowder divorce. There was definitely a bit of that during the primaries as well with de santis.
Frankly i think if anyone is on any list and told to push a certain agenda, they should be blacklisted from conservative discussion
Edit: forgot the christ is king issue as well
Maybe? I do wonder if there could be some use in at least hearing what the people in or behind a media group are talking about, or perhaps planning. If they pretend to cater to conservatives, there's a slight chance they could listen and take in conservative values. Not sure if the good outweighs the bad, though.
There's no shortage of backstabbing RINO scum, but Pearl Davis and her ilk became lolcows entirely on their own.
Considering women do this for dating, it wouldn't shock me. This sounds like exactly something women would do.
A guy in LA is suing about 50 women who belong to a facebook group called 'Are We Dating The Same Guy? LA'. The group has well over 50k members and seems to exist just so women and defame and degrade the men who have the misfortune of going on a date with them. They have, apparently, been making up things about this guy and other men for years.
Naturally facebook has no interest in removing the group and apparently similar groups exist for other large cities in the US. Recently made national news and of course the media couldn't fall over itself fast enough to defend the women and the libelous activity they were engaged in.
Of course there's a DailyWire-sphere equivalent to the Journolist. Every subfaction on every side has group chats and secret Discords and email lists. Why wouldn't they?
https://twitter.com/paleochristcon/status/1773747232161824988?t=_ByRVlW08Q3fO9c6chiR8g&s=19
I'm convinced that there are lists for everything. Whether it's a journalist, or a 'journalist', there's a list for it. And if there isn't, someone is making it right now.
I believe we call them "thinktanks"
Yes I've noticed a similar group response to those things and from the same people.
Yeah, they used to call that slow boiling the frog.
But these people just fire up the grill, so it's very easy to spot when a group is engaging in it.