Is it because you're a faggot clearly running from a discussion you got backed into a corner during? Answer the question. if the entire scope of the game was reversed and not killing Ellie would release the fungus, is Joel still a good guy for murdering all the doctors who are trying to stop the apocalypse because "its a girl muh famileeee"? This was literally the plot of 28 Weeks Later lmao.
In both situations, either she has the cure or the disease, not killing Ellie will kill all of humanity.
Go ahead and rationalize your nonsense why one is okay and presumably the other is not.
Let's flip it around.
Let's say humanity has NOT been wiped out, but this 13 year old girl shows up to a hospital with a cough, and they learn she's carrying a new strain of cordyceps that if it begins producing spores, will 100% kill everybody on the planet. Basically the opposite of the scenario in the game.
The doctors sedated her for the scan but they say at any second the spores could burst. You must make a decision now.
You have three choices.
The first is to kill her and incinerate the body. This 100% prevents the outbreak.
The second is to try to quarantine her. Lock her in a prison against her will for her entire life She can never interact with anyone again. There's a much higher chance than zero that the spores could escape and cause the apocalypse.
The last is the bullshit retard choice at the end of TLOU: you cry like a weepy emotional woman and you whine about "muh morality" and do neither of the above. You say the the moral thing is to leave the choice up to her even if she says no to quarantine. 100% chance everyone dies.
How is this a hard choice whatsoever lmao. Do you think early Man never faced a choice of casting sick people out, condemning them to death, but did so to spare the health of the tribe?
Actually take quarantine off the table. Let's pretend due to the spores bursting any minute, that there's no time to build and move her to quarantine. You either kill her or you don't.
Again how is this a hard choice?
That's the point killing Ellie was going to be fruitless, it was a hail mary even they knew wouldn't work. It was the Fireflies who were willing to kill an innocent child in the name of doing something. It was about them looking like they were doing good as opposed to doing good
Literally everybody who defends Joel writes this speculative drivel. You haven't even the slightest reason to doubt their research. Ellie was the first immune person they found. At worst you find ONE journal entry by someone who expressed cautious optimism. Everybody writes this shit about how they "never would have found a cure" but it's all retcon.
Joel also never once even indicates that's his motivation. His motivation is that he decided despite being a failure as a father the first time, he was entitled to a second chance. And us players are expected to agree with him?
Since you want to attach all these excuses, how about we remove the excuses? Let's say it was 100% guaranteed slam dunk for sure that they'd come up with a treatment? Does that change your mind? If not, then why even bothering mentioning their slim chance of success when it never mattered to you anyway?
Lol and what's the better option?
The savage ignorant barbarian wasteland isn't going to produce anyone with an education. Joel killed everybody with knowledge of the skills needed to find a cure.
Roll into the second game and Joel dies early on (so his stupid rampage was worthless) and Ellie is a degenerate dyke in a relationship with a tranny, so she's not producing kids who might carry the immunity.
An absolute top to bottom pointless waste because Joel was a weepy bitch crying about his irrelevant gay daughter-issues. And he died and the feelings of a corpse are utterly immaterial.
And as a result, in the second game, Ellie ends up a barren genetic dead end because she's a degenerate lesbian in a relationship with a tranny and anyone with any hope of finding a cure was killed. Yes I'm sure the savage barbarian cannibal wasteland future will totally produce the geneticists and microbiologists needed to find a cure. All because Joel is a weak pussy with boo hoo crybaby relationship issues. And he died for it like a bitch.
I only played the first one and it was mediocre and cliche and the ending was retarded. "Save the human species or murder literally the only people with a potential cure for some troon Zoomer. Also no you don't get a choice".
Maybe it was called the Trail of Tears because all these ingrates do is bitch and moan.
Neat root concept, boring cliche story, the most visually interesting movie ever made.
Early lifer.
Unsurprising if you watched either of the last two seasons.
lmao, the amount of speed he had rocketing around that wall looked like a physics glitch, like wall-running in an FPS.
lmao start with the litany of Russian critics who died of exposure to a potent nerve agent that was literally invented by Russia.
Also, Russia shot down that airliner over Ukraine and everyone knows it. They lied and blamed Ukraine, except they had a tiny problem: they had to get the Buk system out of the country and everybody was looking for it, and it was photographed and geolocated the entire trip until it got on a train and left for Russia.
So you know, they don't lie, just political assassinations and mass murder.
They've said a lot of shit in the past that "should" get them cancelled, but the fact that it doesn't happen at all is proof enough of their politics. Plus, you know if it happened (ie: Rich's joke in uh... Hands of Steel? About the 'Tranny Tracker 5000') they'd weep and cry and apologize and probably have a bunch of tranny guest regulars on the show after that.
or Asian problem
Japanese or Korean.
Han Chinese are just as disgusting as a homeless junkie.
Mandatory prevailing wage laws. And I mean the thing looks like it's indestructible.
Notice the lower-case 'white' and the capitalized 'Black'.
I dunno. I read the LOTR as a kid and loved it. I tried to re-reading it like twenty years later, and I honestly couldn't get through the second book. I don't know, it felt like it was wasting so much of my time. There's just insanely long stretches of absolute nothing.
Was that the season with the 'Sons of the Harpy' shit in Mareen? I always felt like something was 'off' about that season, like they were wasting my time with stupid plots that made no sense. Yeah I'm not gonna believe that a bunch of fat merchants were willing to suicidally attack a bunch of trained soldiers and somehow fucking win, literally charging with no regard for their lives like a bunch of insane zombies. That was so goddamn stupid and for me that was the moment the show jumped the shark.
SHEEEEEEEIT SCOOOB
How the fuck would a conscript "know" if his issued AK was "registered"?
Women in 1922: Manually beating rugs, hand-washing linens and hanging to dry, growing, harvesting, and canning because you're in the middle of the Great Depression, sewing new clothes out of sackcloth.
Women in the 2022: "'Alexa, ask Roomba to vacuum. Also, send in my curbside delivery grocery order.' God I'm so oppressed by this patriarchal hell."
That Redditor is going to be posting in a couple years about how their dad commit suicide.
I just thought, what would be a fun way to trigger a divorce, is to stop paying the mortgage and property taxes but don't tell anyone. Bitch can't get the house when the bank owns it lmao
It seems that the idea that being a stay-at-home parent is a full-time job is becoming a thing of the past. A survey commissioned by Welch’s found that mothers work an average of 14 hours a day or a 98-hour workweek — the equivalent of 2.5 full-time jobs caring for their children. The survey looked at 2,000 US moms with children aged 5 to 12 and revealed that, on average, they started their duties at 6:23 a.m. and ended the day at 8:31 p.m., with only 1.7 hours of free time in between.
lmao fucking what
-
Wake up.
-
Send kids to school.
-
Literally nothing for the next 8 hours.
Also, here's the neat thing about kids - they grow up and they eventually take care of themselves. The older a kid gets, the less work they are. The first six years of a kids' life you basically have to do everything for them because they're stupid fuckups (ever seen a five year old insist he can pour his own juice?), but by the time they're seven they can manage most tasks, they can help with the chores, etc.
Even then those 6 years aren't really all THAT much work. Year one is basically just cleaning up their shit. Year two and three is basically making sure they don't kill themselves. Four through six is just performing basic tasks and slinging food at them.
SAHMs want to pretend that they slave away all day. LMAO bitch what, your youngest kid is like 12 years old.
Also, kids nowadays are retarded zombies being raised by tablets. They probably don't do shit like color on walls anymore because they've never seen a marker in real life.
A gentle reminder that the singular even that took Muslims from being criticized to being elite tier ubermensch was butchering the entire staff of a newspaper.
Take note, Christians.