Beating an incumbent President is difficult.
Not when the incumbent is Dementia Joe Biden--probably the worst president in my 61 years on earth.
If DeSantis runs he will win because many who voted Trump the first two times did it holding our noses.
If Trump manages to win the nomination it would be insane to vote Biden against him, given the last four years of sheer insanity and creeping authoritarianism.
That's some feminist horseshit there.
Jordan Peterson told his audience the facts years ago: Women mate across and up status hierarchies, men mate across and down.
When all the men in their social stratum are either already married or not interested, high-powered hose bags bitch, freeze their eggs, and hope for some miracle to happen before they're 50.
"Compatible." Right.
History of In Loco Parentis in Education
In early 19th century England, life expectancy was poor, and parents worried what would happen to their children should they die. In 1855, the Cheadle Hulme School, originally named The Manchester Warehousemen and Clerks’ Orphan School, was established to care for children who had lost their fathers. Because fathers had sole responsibility for, and control of, their children, these children were considered to be orphans. The school adopted the motto in loco parentis to describe its dedication to caring for and educating the children in their custody.
The term in loco parentis became a legal precedent applied to wards of the court, gaining legal standing in the educational field. This concept was adopted in the U.S., where primary and secondary schools, as well as colleges and universities, were permitted to act in loco parentis for their students. As a result, schools were given broad discretionary power and authority in restricting and disciplining students, one court stating in 1866, “…we have no more authority to interfere [in what teachers do or say to students] than we have to control the domestic discipline of a father in his family.”
Roadblock to Students’ Rights
The doctrine of in loco parentis allowed schools to place restrictions on students’ behaviors, both in school and out, and allowed them to punish students in a parent’s stead. Such restrictions included sex-segregated dormitories, curfews imposed differently on women than men, and the expulsion of female students who were “morally undesirable.” Colleges and universities also sought to restrict students’ right to free speech, forbidding student organizations from demonstrating on campus.
In the 1960s and 1970s, in loco parentis met public opposition, especially where it applied to imposing the will of educators on adult students. Following a number of landmark rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, the application of in loco parentis disappeared from institutions of higher education in the U.S., though it still applies to some extent in primary and secondary schools.
A fitting end for a narcissist.
At the start of a life, one should expect less-than-ideal conditions. I lived in a rooming house for the first year of my independence until I upgraded to a nice studio apartment with my first tax refund, and so on and so forth. (Interesting anecdote: a guy died in the room next to mine and I notified the owner of the stench, after which she entered the room, revealing a rotting corpse set upon by roaches.)
Maybe some of the older stay-at-home types have unrealistic expectations about independent life.
An adult living at home ought to do these things voluntarily. This "contract" is something the parents of a complete asshole would be forced to write. Item 3 suggests some prior unpleasantness in the relationship.
I can think of a lot of kids who would have been glad to have all this shit spelled out in black-and-white. It would have spared everyone a lot of neuroticism and game-playing.
Yahoo "news" never fails to amuse with its transparent click/race baiting.
I thought it was something like that.
This is the only politician actively attacking our real internal enemies. I'm willing to overlook any past inconsistency for this present scorched-earth approach.
I really hope he runs next year. Everyone wants a moderate version of Trump--here he is.
Ask and ye shall receive:
This fucking harpy again? She gets a slickie any time there's race conflict.
Butterface really needs a boot in it.
(((subversives)))
Neo-Marxist identitarian intersectionalists?
What's with the triple parentheses? Does that mean something?
Is this what's called "chimping out"?
I wonder what the Patriot Twins will have to say about this.
Add another incident to the hate crime hoax database: https://www.fakehatecrimes.org/
Nonsense. First Amendment. All the more reason to never, ever capitulate to their demands
It would be interesting if anyone actually put the bag on Vlad and he was banged up the same time as Trump.
How utterly bizarre.
I agree. Every single move toward totalitarianism by the DP has been motivated by their loss in 2016, just like the conversion of corporate journalism to pro-regime serial liars was motivated by their clownish imbecility leading up to their apparently fatal loss of face.
A rogue, uncontrollable bull like Trump will not be groomed, and as crazy as he is, Trump's real purpose, whether he's aware of it or not, is to destroy the bureaucratic status quo and keep the deep state in focus, in the light.
I can't imagine the lengths the regime would go to if he's elected again next year.
Why must propaganda always be "spewed" to these morons?
So what?
Another asshole "journalist" shilling for centralized information control.
deviated from its original purely anti feminism/anti sjw focus
How is being antifeminist and anti sjw not "political"?
So how is being "anti sjw" not a part of "world politics"?
It just never ends.
Fifty years from now Trump's mummified corpse will be displayed on the WH lawn for ritual debasement--they'll put donkey ears on it and have trannies fuck children before it to appease Moloch.
Upvote for Harlan Ellison reference.