7
NoStumpyTrumpy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Uh...no? It's harder to make a libel claim as a public figure, private persons have a much easier time suing someone for libel.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Germany was in the right in WWI. No excuses for WWII (although there were very obviously many contributing factors relating to the persecution & "reconstruction" of Germany post WWI).

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The UK is getting what it deserves at this point.

3
NoStumpyTrumpy 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is great, a list i can quickly reference before doing business with anyone. Saved!

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think all states have a romeo and juliet law that covers the 19-17 issue.

10
NoStumpyTrumpy 10 points ago +10 / -0

First sentence uses "income inequality and gentrification", which is really nice because it lets us know the remainder will be leftist drivel.

19
NoStumpyTrumpy 19 points ago +19 / -0

Thank you for the summary.

2
NoStumpyTrumpy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. The concept of the "Cherokee princess" is perhaps the most common ancestral falsehood. They have some of the most strict bloodline proof requirements since so many people think they have Cherokee blood due to family legends.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The flying of flags, I don't think so (but I could be wrong).

But the taking sides, yes. WWI occurred because nations took sides. The French took America's side during the revolution. Whenever it serves a country's foreign interests, they tend to pick a side.

2
NoStumpyTrumpy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't even recall a "hate crime" in recent memory that wasn't a fake.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The funny part is that privately, I imagine the SJWs prefer either left or middle.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

NAMBLA was the early sponsor of the lgbt propaganda. They got pushed out (really just had their involvement hidden) when the movement started gaining traction

2
NoStumpyTrumpy 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the usual message pushed to try to salvage the "it's not a choice" argument by trying to tie it to genetics.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. I remember playing games and having to gasp read quest text and dialog to figure out where to go. I miss that. I realized the other day while playing a game I was staring at the minimap instead of the open world.

1
NoStumpyTrumpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

If she falls doing a kick like that (or for any other reason), she risks doing serious harm to her child.

2
NoStumpyTrumpy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously. My wife is thin and didn't even show she was pregnant until well into her third trimester. Her mother gained 60 pounds while pregnant with her, she was adamant that wouldn't happen.

Our kid isn't 3 months old and she's below her weight when she got pregnant. I'm super proud of her dedication and self-control.

29
NoStumpyTrumpy 29 points ago +29 / -0

Wow...those sentencing periods. She could serve as little as one year (and likely only half of that as actual time served).

Seems to me someone like that should spend far more time since she basically just fucked up the kid's development. He's going to have issues the rest of his life.

view more: Next ›