7
NoEyesNoGroin 7 points ago +7 / -0

The first season of Black Mirror was great (but bleak af). Second season onward, why even bother. Also, paying to watch TV? lol

11
NoEyesNoGroin 11 points ago +11 / -0

The Iron Law of Woke Projection never fails.

2
NoEyesNoGroin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never bothered double-checking it because he wasn't important at the time but didn't RFK say something along the lines of "we have to shut down dissent against [Current Thing that i can't recall right now]"?

2
NoEyesNoGroin 2 points ago +2 / -0

LGBTQ-owned and-operated businesses

Isn't it illegal to discriminate against straight people?

0
NoEyesNoGroin 0 points ago +2 / -2

Congrats on posting one of the dumbest comments ever put on the internet.

1
NoEyesNoGroin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about - hear me out now - not living under a dictatorship? Crazy, I know!

0
NoEyesNoGroin 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'd be happy to but you'd first need to develop a functioning brain.

-12
NoEyesNoGroin -12 points ago +1 / -13

Don't be a fool. The West has one foot in the door of tyranny but isn't there yet. The fact that you can say what you just said and not be disappeared like happens in China or Russia is proof of that.

-9
NoEyesNoGroin -9 points ago +2 / -11

Yup that's not a hard choice. One side actually values things I value, the other side actively wants to outlaw my beliefs.

You're retarded. Putin doesn't care about any of those things any more than woke scum care about equality. It's just rhetoric for braindead scum like you to eat up.

Btw, if you love Russia so much why don't you move there?

7
NoEyesNoGroin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imp is finally becoming the mad scientist out to destroy humanity to pwn the wombs

0
NoEyesNoGroin 0 points ago +1 / -1

NATO would get smoked in a ground war with the Russians.

Putin bootlickers: making woke cultists look sane since 2022

-13
NoEyesNoGroin -13 points ago +3 / -16

I find it amusing that some retards here think a nepotistic dictatorship is fine as long as it holds the degenerates at bay.

3
NoEyesNoGroin 3 points ago +3 / -0

No wonder the 80s were so awesome.

4
NoEyesNoGroin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still like Linus. It's one thing to support the truth in institutions, but in person it's complicated because the blob is mentally ill, so it's like your employee thinks they're Napoleon but you can't fire them because there are laws against discriminating against mentally ill Napoleons - all you can really do is avoid upsetting them. This is why anti-discrimination laws need to be repealed across the board.

5
NoEyesNoGroin 5 points ago +5 / -0

One point of correction on this video - eggs are super healthy and nutritious unless they're fried or hard boiled. Explanation.

4
NoEyesNoGroin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Related: there's a long series about the Linear No-Threshold theory, which permeates the health "science" around toxicity and radiation exposure, that has recently been discredited and shown to be the work of fraud & corruption similar to the kind in this video. It's more than 20 hours long but I binged through the whole thing in 1 day, it's very interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5FjhgcnMjU

2
NoEyesNoGroin 2 points ago +2 / -0

You genuinely don't know what you are talking about. You are just arguing against a strawman, rather than dealing with the evidence.

You're calling me ignorant when you haven't even figured out that the deranged covid cultists, the deranged climate cultists, the deranged race cultists, the deranged gender cultists, the deranged capitalism cultists, the deranged colonialism cultists, and broadly the deranged woke cultists are all part of the same Marxist cult. I suggest you look at how the 1990 IPCC """consensus""" was formed, and at ClimateGate, and at the woke cult generally. And if after all that you still don't get it, you never will.

4
NoEyesNoGroin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not sure I can agree with most of this study

Fortunately we have so many impartial experts who can look at it and freely debate its merits and whose careers and credibility aren't dependent on that debate concluding in a particular way.

Actually most people would try and use this to prove AGW

Probably. Climate catastrophism and reason have long since parted ways.

4
NoEyesNoGroin 4 points ago +5 / -1

That's surface temperature. Try reading what you're responding to before drooling words onto the internet.

8
NoEyesNoGroin 8 points ago +9 / -1

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere alters the environment.

And for all that effort, only 12% of the carbon in the atmosphere is from after 1750.

The vast amount of human activity causes climate change. No shit.

In Feb this year, ocean temps rose so much and so fast that a third of the total warming since 1995 occurred in 3 weeks. This event alone discredits the consensus AGW model.

14
NoEyesNoGroin 14 points ago +14 / -0

Accepting post-op ones with their permanent rotting wound would be even worse.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›