I've personally destroyed more than ten thousand dollars worth of ingame items in Eve. Not counting normal things like regular ships, but irreplaceable BPOs and POSes and such.
Never got on a Chribba killmail and that's about my biggest regret for the game.
Yes, but also the other less savory implications as well.
Psychology is important to win, sure. If you surprise most people, the caveman part of their brain will lock up and you can get a few good hits in before they can make themselves react. It also includes understanding tactics like attacking during the opponent's sleep schedule.
But also that attacking the other person behind the character is effective as well. Eve is filled with doxxing, hacking, even outright espionage. If the other guy stops playing then you've won.
And beyond that, it's the understanding that it's real people spouting the vile things leftoids believe online. Those are people, and those people are enemies.
Once again, proven wrong by history.
The majority opinion of almost every major step of degeneracy in the last century was opposed to what was enacted.
Take sodomite marriage for example. Legalized by judicial fiat, majority of states and people across the board opposed it.
And yet here we are. Where you can get cancelled for saying that a man isn't a woman. And the proles just sit back and take it. Just like they sit back and take everything.
Because you can legislate morality. Even against an unwilling population.
Hardly, I'm just not enough of a fool to fail to understand that the concept of formally codified laws is inherently a legislation of morality.
That's why murder is illegal, for example. That's legislating morality. There's no utopian thinking here, rather the opposite.
A people can be guided along a particular path, positive or negative, by leadership. Because most people, normies, are stupid sheep.
Being stupid sheep, they go in whatever direction they're herded. In this case, from a lack of strong moral direction, be that from a self satisfied and corrupt financial cartel, a demonic bolshevist cult, or the abdicated clergy, the American people have been deracinated. A once distinct identity as a people dissolved into a colorless, nonsensical sludge.
They can be herded back into a strong, decent people eventually, although likely not without unprecedented violence against the above negative influences.
Sure you can. It's a trite, postmodernist soundbite that claims otherwise. I don't subscribe to millennial snark as a substitute for an actual argument.
In this case, a degenerate law, not even a law really a judicial ruling, was enacted to foment more down the line.
Which has observably happened in the last few decades. It's "we just want to get married" but for sluts instead of fags.
Any parent knows. Permissiveness only leads to more bad behavior.
You absolutely can legislate morality, there are very few other purposes for formally codified laws.
And to answer your question it's both. Slippery slope and all that. In this case, specifically infiltrators from the Frankfurt school and other various remnants of Trotsky's bullshit. One mustn't violate rule 16 by naming them of course.
That's an example for more stringent moral watchfulness, not less. Our ancestors did not guard against the enemy and thus opened the doors for worse down the line.
Simplicius is very good on OSINT, less so on philosophy. I believe he's some form of agnostic and it colors his writing there.