There are three reasons why pro-life is such an unpopular position, even in red states, that most people are too polite to say out loud, but which make a helluva lot more sense than the explicitly stated reasons for being pro-abortion.
-
Most people are absolutely terrified of the prospect of not being able to abort a cripple or retard baby. Throughout most of history, outright infanticide was often used to dispense with such profoundly burdensome people. And tbf, people can barely afford to raise a normal child in our dysfunctional economy, nvm a child who will never really "grow up," will always be as tedious to attend to as a toddler in terms of having to protect them from themselves, to say nothing of the medical costs.
-
The nigger population would explode. No matter how much groid worship Baizuo engage in, no matter how much public self-effacing bullshit and BLM signs they put up, etc, even shitlibs are absolutely terrified of this happening. Hell, functional blacks are terrified of this as well.
-
Only a complete degenerate would have an abortion of convenience, rather than of necessity. So why in the world do you want trash like that to reproduce, and to raise kids? They're only gonna resent and often abuse any kids they're forced to have, because kids to these people = no more fun.
You don't have to like it, or agree with it, but this is the subtext behind why pro-life is such an uphill battle electorally. Moreover, even if it is killing babies, most people don't actually have a principled stance against infanticide - sure, it's unpleasant, nobody wants to see it, but history and even third world countries today attest to the fact that a principled opposition to infanticide is a luxury belief.
Even a principled opposition to homicide is a luxury belief, as there are plenty of contexts where we're willing to kill people, even civilians. It's just that you can't have a functioning society where people are allowed to kill each other, whereas you can have a functioning society where people are allowed to kill their babies.
Hardly, I'm just not enough of a fool to fail to understand that the concept of formally codified laws is inherently a legislation of morality.
That's why murder is illegal, for example. That's legislating morality. There's no utopian thinking here, rather the opposite.
A people can be guided along a particular path, positive or negative, by leadership. Because most people, normies, are stupid sheep.
Being stupid sheep, they go in whatever direction they're herded. In this case, from a lack of strong moral direction, be that from a self satisfied and corrupt financial cartel, a demonic bolshevist cult, or the abdicated clergy, the American people have been deracinated. A once distinct identity as a people dissolved into a colorless, nonsensical sludge.
They can be herded back into a strong, decent people eventually, although likely not without unprecedented violence against the above negative influences.
Another dipshit comment.
Making murder illegal doesn't legislate the morality of it, only punishes the act. Laws don't dictate morality, they only reflect it. Most people think murder a should be illegal, so the law punishes it. If most people thought murder was acceptable, laws would reflect that, even if the minority insisted it was immoral.
Hence, blue states legalize murdering infants in utero, because they believe that is moral.
Regardless, I'm done arguing with an aithorittarian cunt who believes that with harsh enough laws you can legislate people into goodness.
Later, moron.
Once again, proven wrong by history.
The majority opinion of almost every major step of degeneracy in the last century was opposed to what was enacted.
Take sodomite marriage for example. Legalized by judicial fiat, majority of states and people across the board opposed it.
And yet here we are. Where you can get cancelled for saying that a man isn't a woman. And the proles just sit back and take it. Just like they sit back and take everything.
Because you can legislate morality. Even against an unwilling population.