There are three reasons why pro-life is such an unpopular position, even in red states, that most people are too polite to say out loud, but which make a helluva lot more sense than the explicitly stated reasons for being pro-abortion.
-
Most people are absolutely terrified of the prospect of not being able to abort a cripple or retard baby. Throughout most of history, outright infanticide was often used to dispense with such profoundly burdensome people. And tbf, people can barely afford to raise a normal child in our dysfunctional economy, nvm a child who will never really "grow up," will always be as tedious to attend to as a toddler in terms of having to protect them from themselves, to say nothing of the medical costs.
-
The nigger population would explode. No matter how much groid worship Baizuo engage in, no matter how much public self-effacing bullshit and BLM signs they put up, etc, even shitlibs are absolutely terrified of this happening. Hell, functional blacks are terrified of this as well.
-
Only a complete degenerate would have an abortion of convenience, rather than of necessity. So why in the world do you want trash like that to reproduce, and to raise kids? They're only gonna resent and often abuse any kids they're forced to have, because kids to these people = no more fun.
You don't have to like it, or agree with it, but this is the subtext behind why pro-life is such an uphill battle electorally. Moreover, even if it is killing babies, most people don't actually have a principled stance against infanticide - sure, it's unpleasant, nobody wants to see it, but history and even third world countries today attest to the fact that a principled opposition to infanticide is a luxury belief.
Even a principled opposition to homicide is a luxury belief, as there are plenty of contexts where we're willing to kill people, even civilians. It's just that you can't have a functioning society where people are allowed to kill each other, whereas you can have a functioning society where people are allowed to kill their babies.
God cursed the United States when we legalized child murder for convenience.
Since the Roe decision, we've fallen off cliffs demographically, economically and socially. Not to mention morally. It was alongside the Hart Celler Act the largest blow against the American people in the last two centuries.
Of course it needs to go away, regardless of the arguments for it after the fact. Not only was it ever legalized through judicial fiat, and therefore unjustly enacted in the first place, but it's bad policy that has among other things been the biggest contributing factor in the modern psychopathic zeitgeist of women.
Yes the negroid population would explode. That wouldn't have mattered sixty years ago, because they were a tiny fraction of the population they are now. If you really want to curtail them you need to abolish all social welfare and commit to letting them starve until they reach a population they can sustain. That applies to Africa as a whole too in terms of foreign aid. They breed like rabbits because we keep throwing them more free stuff to do it.
I agree about God cursing us. Sadly it is a big loser for our side.
I don't allow political convenience to override moral correctness.
That's precisely how we got into this situation to begin with.
No arguments from me. It just sucks but like you said the Lord calls us to a higher standard
If we could deport 90% of blacks first, then I would be okay with banning abortion outright.
Make it 100% with the option of maybe 5% being able to reapply for merit based re-entry and you're on.
But we definitely need to deport 100% of Somalis and Pakis and Jeets with no hope of the entry ever for them or their kin.
I was with you until you said reapply.
Deal.
How do you propose deporting people whose ancestors were brought here against their will 6+ generations ago. That's an absolutely retarded idea.
Their ancestors should've been deported in the first place
Agreed.
Easy. We just copy what the rule16s are doing with muslims. We set up NGOs that load them into boats and then simply drop them off in another country against that country's will. Rule16istan would be a perfect place to drop them all too.
Same way the first got here.
I guess we'd do the same thing but in the opposite direction. You know, against their will.
Yeah I mean to the extent you can actually deport anyone, I see not the problem with this
"God" is a psyop. He's supposedly omniscient and omnipotent and yet he can't even do a little thing like stop abortion?
2009 reddit atheist tier take
Which came first, abortion or degeneracy? You cannot legislate morality. When the people are degenerates, they will demand degenerate laws.
You absolutely can legislate morality, there are very few other purposes for formally codified laws.
And to answer your question it's both. Slippery slope and all that. In this case, specifically infiltrators from the Frankfurt school and other various remnants of Trotsky's bullshit. One mustn't violate rule 16 by naming them of course.
That's an example for more stringent moral watchfulness, not less. Our ancestors did not guard against the enemy and thus opened the doors for worse down the line.
No. You can't. You can try, but you will fail unless the majority is with you. Attempt legislating morality on majority evil people who reject it, and they'll elect somebody who supports their degeneracy. This isn't hard to understand.
Sure you can. It's a trite, postmodernist soundbite that claims otherwise. I don't subscribe to millennial snark as a substitute for an actual argument.
In this case, a degenerate law, not even a law really a judicial ruling, was enacted to foment more down the line.
Which has observably happened in the last few decades. It's "we just want to get married" but for sluts instead of fags.
Any parent knows. Permissiveness only leads to more bad behavior.
Morality is the only thing you can legislate other than logistics.
Everything else is just negotiating and claptrap.
You cum guzzling mongrel
We absolutely can legislate morality. In fact, we already have. Murder is immoral and it is illegal. You can still kill someone, but you will be punished for it.
What you are describing is them literally legislating their morality lol.
You are assuming the premise of a style of governance where the majority rules, there is voting, and evil people are allowed to vote. Something like a benevolent dictatorship would have no problem legislating morality unless the evil people were in a position to overthrow the government.
Most people were against these laws which is why they were backdoored through court action.
That's because democracy falls afoul of the fallacy that morals are determined by popular vote.
This is one of those things that sounds smart and deep, but the more you think about it the less it make sense.
Just gotta get the lolberts to realize narrowly applied harm principle is a morality.
Obviously degeneracy
So much for "muh just god". You god is punishing people who had nothing to do with it. Hurting people them and driving them to suicide because he was too lazy to kill the jews, too lazy to answer prayers, too lazy to keep the blacks on the east side of the Atlantic.
Why worship such a piece of shit? Because he's more powerful than you? Joe Biden is more powerful than you, go worship him. Because he "created" you? Your parents created you, why don't you worship them?
Fuck your god. Christians are the single biggest cause of the problems of the world. Their love of betrayal and stabbing their tribemates anytime they start to actually solve problems has prevented more solutions than any other cause. If i believed in a god, I would have to slaughter all of his followers because he is an utter piece of shit, and that is the only way to hurt him. Lucky for you I no longer believe.
Incorrect. Collective actions necessitate collective punishment. That is every bit as just as might be expected.
Also obligatory "settle down, Beavis."
You want it that way? Fine. Slaughter every Christian because they are collectively preventing a stable society by protecting niggers, jews, and spics. They are stopping the destruction of whites enemies, so they must be destroyed.
Traitors before enemies.
Teeeeelllll me why!
Maximum edgy atheist tween rant.
"How can a just god allow suffering" is not a gotcha. It is childish misunderstanding of God's will.
A parent doesn't exist to shield their children from all danger forever. Part of raising a child is allowing them to make mistakes and be hurt. A life with no pain or suffering is a life in a prison - a half life. Someone who never experiences suffering will never be able to grow from it - the bad times are a necessary part of the growth of individuals and societies, and even the species as a whole.
I shouldn't expect adult understanding from a socialist, but maybe you'll actually be able to process this basic lesson one day when you grow up.
The childlike understanding of God is so ridiculous. You can't understand joy without suffering. We couldn't have free will without suffering
God's will is not answering prayers. Ask me how I know. He loves giving people crippling diseases as a child, enslaving them to the Medical Industrial Complex. He enjoys utterly crushing children's hopes and dreams. Taking everything they could be and everything they hope to accomplish and compacting it into a tiny ball of oblivion. He does it for the Lulz.
Fuck your god.
I like how quickly it took to devolve into the shit tier atheist rant wherein if God doesn't behave like a genie then clearly He doesn't exist.
What did you pray to God about? And what did he not answer? I feel like many of my prayers went unheard
Found the retard
You're confusing man with God. God didn't put us here to have butt sex and import slaves and shit. Man always uses God as an excuse to do what we want and justify it.
You are disillusioned by and from judeo-christianity. That's good. It's a false religion of man.