He's a yuro, not a US citizen. So he sometimes does, and sometimes doesn't when it comes to more U.S. centric items. U.S. pop culture isn't always popular in eurofagland, especially the more military themed stuff.
Mark Wahlberg is the cooler right wing version of Damon, and Shooter is better than the Bourne movies anyway.
Teaching should be retirement age jobs for people with history in the subject, not 20 something faggots with a "teaching" degree.
A lot of retards don't change, that's why some of the retards just pivot into a different flavor of lefty. "Authoritarianism / gay race communism is cool if it's OUR guys" retards are this type.
There is a common pretense that gamergate was made up of a bunch of apolitical or leftist manchildren. I remember a whole lot more right wing posters saying "I told you fucking idiots" than the "I would be a dem but" types want to acknowledge.
Many leftists on a fundamental level believe the government is their master. You don't have money, the government has money it allows you to use. They see food stamps as free money. They're serfs, mentally.
If they could handle money responsibly without restriction they probably wouldn't be on welfare to begin with. Welfare like food stamps isn't "gimmedat money". It's a tool to provide specific basic needs for the disadvantaged or incompetent.
Wasn't he a huge lefty at some point?
A state that is both culturally and politically dominated by an ethnic group, and where the government explicitly prioritizes that group above all others. For example, South Africa when controlled by whites wasn't really a white ethnostate - they were politically dominant, but not culturally dominant. Now it is an african ethnostate, because it is culturally and politically dominated. Germany under hitler would have been an ethnostate, Germany now isn't. Israel is, because it is dominated specifically by jewish culture and jewish people.
It has to be to an undeniable degree. For example, I would say that China, despite being pretty xenophobic as a culture, isn't really an ethnostate, or at least not to the same degree - because everyone is treated like shit there. The government doesn't promote an ethnic group, it promotes itself at the expense of anyone it can exert control over. I don't think the US was an ethnostate - while it excluded a specific group or multiple groups, it didn't prioritize one specific group - there was always a confluence of different ethnicities involved, even counting just the european groups at first.
Israel is explicitly an ethnostate (and implicitly the weapons testing range of the deep state). Conflation of the criticism of a nation with criticism of an ethnic group is a common tool used by leftists. All leftists project.
There is not and will never be a truly free international market. Free trade works well within the confines of the nation, but purist libertarianism without discernment is as flawed as anything else.
As vicious-snek pointed out, there are nations that use economics as a form of warfare. And for the general benefit of the country we have some standard labor laws, while shitholes use slave labor. There will always be downsides to protectionism as well, but economics should be considered as part of national security, and national industry thus protected to a degree.
We can have free trade with things like entertainment, but our farms and local manufacturing capacity need to be supported. None of our military hardware should be made in China, for example. Taking protectionism too far is also a problem, but we need a certain level of it to preserve the capacity for local industry, and the ability to expand that capacity rapidly.
For another example, oil. Should we not buy oil from the middle east? It's a limited resource, if we can exploit them we should, because it preserves our own stores - but we should produce enough that our own local industry is functional and capable of expanding to meet our needs wholly if necessary.
I think that there are people that definitively do not live up to basic standards for what a lot of us would consider "human". I just don't think it's inherently tied to any one racial group.
Fuck off, fag. I hate niggerspeak but I refuse to be used as cover for leftist authoritarian goblins, just for having standards.
Preferably the parents would be involved first, and government would only be involved at lowest levels starting with actual criminal behavior.
The slang use is referring to social authoritarianism.
Puritanism as used is a broader term, not specifically about the christian denomination. And authoritarianism is leftism, it is what the troons act in service of - using government force to compel behavior.
I have never seen something more bullshit than the "fortified" election in 2020.
Our legal system needs to classify this kind of shit as fraud.
collectivist
Isn't right wing, keep dreaming wehraboo. You commies are literally just a splinter group promoted by globalist actors to harm the right.
Only because this forum is functionally dead, and has been brigaded relentlessly as part of a deliberate subversion operation.
Libertarian principles allow for rejecting the systematic use of homosexuality as a weapon. Actual libertarian principle is "do what you want to yourself but don't harm others or try to force it on anyone else" and the fucking faggots and troonery is nothing but forced and harmful.
I'd be fine if gays got back in the fucking closet, and nobody ever allowed troonery to be taken seriously again - the deranged faggots can go kill themselves in the corners like they used to. It's the system enabling them, promoting them, giving them privileges and access to children that is the harm.
In an actual functional libertarian society, shooting a pedo teacher that tried to groom your kids would be considered justified.
you'd consume and support western dissidents creating media
There is no exclusivity clause. Both are useful.
zoomer babble
Stop
The palworld lawsuit is entirely on terrible japanese patent law.
To the deranged products of our modern propaganda farm called the media, up is down, left is right, and everyone deserves rights except actual citizens.
Almost never do the actions of the governments of the world reflect the will of their people. Ethnic groups do not control nations. Small groups of elites control nations. A nation's people is it's greatest resource in most times, but a nation and a people are different. Look at the arbitrarily designed states in the middle east.