Israel is explicitly an ethnostate (and implicitly the weapons testing range of the deep state). Conflation of the criticism of a nation with criticism of an ethnic group is a common tool used by leftists. All leftists project.
Almost never do the actions of the governments of the world reflect the will of their people. Ethnic groups do not control nations. Small groups of elites control nations. A nation's people is it's greatest resource in most times, but a nation and a people are different. Look at the arbitrarily designed states in the middle east.
A state that is both culturally and politically dominated by an ethnic group, and where the government explicitly prioritizes that group above all others. For example, South Africa when controlled by whites wasn't really a white ethnostate - they were politically dominant, but not culturally dominant. Now it is an african ethnostate, because it is culturally and politically dominated. Germany under hitler would have been an ethnostate, Germany now isn't. Israel is, because it is dominated specifically by jewish culture and jewish people.
It has to be to an undeniable degree. For example, I would say that China, despite being pretty xenophobic as a culture, isn't really an ethnostate, or at least not to the same degree - because everyone is treated like shit there. The government doesn't promote an ethnic group, it promotes itself at the expense of anyone it can exert control over. I don't think the US was an ethnostate - while it excluded a specific group or multiple groups, it didn't prioritize one specific group - there was always a confluence of different ethnicities involved, even counting just the european groups at first.
Israel is explicitly an ethnostate (and implicitly the weapons testing range of the deep state). Conflation of the criticism of a nation with criticism of an ethnic group is a common tool used by leftists. All leftists project.
A nation is its people.
Almost never do the actions of the governments of the world reflect the will of their people. Ethnic groups do not control nations. Small groups of elites control nations. A nation's people is it's greatest resource in most times, but a nation and a people are different. Look at the arbitrarily designed states in the middle east.
Conflation of religion and ethnicity is also stupidly common. Racism is their hammer and noticing trends are their nails.
I agree with the latter part, but what's your definition of 'ethnostate'?
A state that is both culturally and politically dominated by an ethnic group, and where the government explicitly prioritizes that group above all others. For example, South Africa when controlled by whites wasn't really a white ethnostate - they were politically dominant, but not culturally dominant. Now it is an african ethnostate, because it is culturally and politically dominated. Germany under hitler would have been an ethnostate, Germany now isn't. Israel is, because it is dominated specifically by jewish culture and jewish people.
It has to be to an undeniable degree. For example, I would say that China, despite being pretty xenophobic as a culture, isn't really an ethnostate, or at least not to the same degree - because everyone is treated like shit there. The government doesn't promote an ethnic group, it promotes itself at the expense of anyone it can exert control over. I don't think the US was an ethnostate - while it excluded a specific group or multiple groups, it didn't prioritize one specific group - there was always a confluence of different ethnicities involved, even counting just the european groups at first.