What's more likely to cause you to kill yourself, sterilizing yourself and mutilating your body forever, or NOT doing that?

The question is how many customers will they have left by next week?

fucking apple thieves. shoot em.

Wasn't this the show that attracted a 'based' fanbase despite being "a satire" that is "making fun of you" like Fight Club or Starship Troopers? And the creators were mad the fans liked it for the "wrong" reasons? This is clearly an attempt to correct that.

Well I've never seen an episode and I won't start now.

Legal realism. Negrolotry is the state religion, and blasphemy will not be tolerated, regardless of laws.

"Legal rigging" is an interesting take.

For a fact, most of the states (but not all) had laws against changing election processes too close to the election, and against sending out mail in ballots without signature verification. In most cases these laws were ignored "because Covid" and went unchallenged. (Texas challenged this and won every single case against it)

So the question is, if someone breaks the law but isn't punished, is that ""legal""? Especially if someone else was punished for breaking the same law in another jurisdiction. What does "the law" even mean in this context?

There's also the question if a clearly unjust law that does not serve the public interest is a valid law? In my state, what happened in 2020 was fully legal, but hardly moral, just, or right.

"Most X ever" is a classic lying tell.

If I said I was a good shot with a bow, or even that I was in my school archery club and won several state competitions, you would have no reason to doubt me. But if I told you I was THE BEST archer in HISTORY, you immediately know I am lying.

If the 2020 election was safe and secure, fine. But the MOST SECURE? They stole it. Period.

The left's response to the assassination has been textbook female. Trump's blood wasn't even dry, an innocent bystander got his brains blown out, and the left was saying, "You need to lower your voice. Stop yelling at us!" It's just like arguing with a woman when you caught her red handed doing bad shit. She knows you got her, so she attacks you for the act of confronting her.

Removing the nonsensical "actual malice" standard would go a long way. The current SCOTUS has indicated it is interested in overturning this, but not on behalf of thought criminals like Jared Taylor or Peter Brimlow.

Free speech was never meant to cover lies. The founding fathers believed strongly in libel and slander laws (which were seen as more civilized to public dueling, the previous way you punished someone for lying about you.) Since libel and slander have become effectively legal, cancel culture is the only thing left.

If we restore free speech to the pre-Sullivan standard, where truth is always a defense and lies are illegal, I'm fine with Carmack's view.

The issue was always one of moral standards. The left cancels people for saying true facts like "men aren't women." We're going after people who are saying "DIE DIE DIE WE WANT YOU TO DIEEEEEE!"

Societal morality needs to be corrected.

I doubt this is what people think it is. Microsoft is a pajeet company now, DEI rules are meant to undermind the ruling group so they're getting rid of them. They're not going to magically start hiring meritocratically, they just don't want white people deploying those weapons against them.

You're the typical "leftism but slower" conservative who would shoot your own side in the back for the crime of returning fire.

That dude is a shill. No one on our side uses the term fascism unironically. It's just an enemy buzzword. He's a typical entryist meant to shame and attack us.

Found the shill

Correct. The history of the world is a history of murder, violence, and war. We've been spoiled by peaceful times. Every leftist is sad he missed, and every righty wants heads on spikes. Both attitudes are perfectly normal. This is, in fact, Who We Are.

Billion dollar fine

Called it. Women will mindlessly follow the rules without doing any follow up or attempting to accomplish their intended task. All they want to do is offload responsibility to a faceless policy. It's why all the most intractable bureaucrats are women, e.g. usless DMV hags filling out paperwork, etc.

Hope that dude gets a hero's funeral.

Yeah it's mid 70s here (midwest) we haven't even gotten the hot August weather yet, it's been very rainy, yet the news is all HEAT WAVE OMG.

Most popular president in history folks

There's no such thing as judeo Christianity. Judaism is phariseeism. All jews are called to repent and convert, or be forever damned. That was church dogma for 2000 years. Don't adopt your enemies' frame.

Reform Judaism is the same as wokism

Not to mention Jones was never convicted of anything, the court made a default judgement against him, something that normally only happens when you fail to show up. Imagine showing up in court only to be told you're guilty by default, and given this outrageous fine. If this was a movie plot it would be aughed at for being unbelievable.

I don't even disagree about Mother Gothel from Tangled. Every time I watch that movie I remark that she's one big Jewish stereotype. The explanation is probably closer to home though. Hollywood is super Jewish, and Jewish moms are notoriously selfish, vain, and manipulative. Everyone who worked on that film probably has a mom just like that. Jews just used to have a better sense of humor about themselves.