0
Gizortnik 0 points ago +6 / -6

That would be great if you could tell the difference between enemy globalist elitist and literally any jew.

So, besides a nose check, do you have any evidence regarding this person being a cartel member. Say, any white papers on Financial Inclusivity?

16
Gizortnik 16 points ago +17 / -1

Unhelpful and unproductive. It's probably not in the cards at this point. A scandal and an impeachment would do better.

They'd have to kill both Trump and Vance, and that's a tall order without causing an absolute shit storm.

People are now actually conditioned to suspect them more than random psychos.

-5
Gizortnik -5 points ago +6 / -11

I was hoping you had literally anything besides hurr durr jerr ((()))

But you don't because you're a stupid faggot.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

thanks, not OP

Doin' the real work.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe also don't go to Texas in the winter because apparently they can't drive for shit if it's icy.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now, we can unify with people. We don't unify with Communists, and we don't unify with Neo-Conservative backstabbers.

0
Gizortnik 0 points ago +1 / -1

I understand how deserted it is, I just didn't realize he was from Canada.

That gas price though.

19
Gizortnik 19 points ago +19 / -0

California and LAX might be a problem, mostly because LAX is busy and California has stupid regulations and cities paved with shit and crime; but most of America is going to be absolutely fine. We are a very big country and the Left have a a lot of places that they are not.

If you're going out to Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. You're gonna be perfectly fine. In fact, Wyoming might require some excitement.

Also, be cognizant of the distances you're going to be traveling and the weather you'll encounter. We measure distances in hours. Don't be surprised when we tell you that a short drive is 30 minutes. Also don't be surprised if you get told by navigation systems "Turn left in two-hundred and thirty seven miles". It sounds like you might need both cold and warm weather clothing. Check the weather of your destinations now and see the differences.

Oh yeah. Gas prices in California are going to astronomically retarded. Possibly higher than Europe. When you get out of the state, it'll come down to normal America prices.

Use websites like Gas Buddy or the like to find gas prices if you need cheap gas.

Feel free to ask more questions!

And, if you've never been here before, and you're from Europe, I'm going to say it again. You do not understand just how big America really is.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you think this could at least translate into more customers becoming more vigilant about signs of wokeness, avoiding products with those things, and using word of mouth to promote better design and marketing philosophies?

Sure, remember how wokeness got here in the first place. Wokeness promotes being an "educated consumer". They buy "fair-trade, organic" whatever because of their political alignment, even though it's more expensive. That's why marketing teams use it as a sales pitch to the C-suite.

The problem is that the entire marketing industry is now comprised entirely of corporate Antifa; so they will straight up lie about whether or not gamers want SJW politics.

In gaming we don't have the ability to make institutional safegaurds. We actually have to straight up defund the bad institutions, and ask good institutions to make apolitical good games, or make anti-Leftist declarations.

This has been the problem. The customers have been there since 2014, that's what GamerGate became. We really need separate institutions at this point.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that's the gap. It's one of the few places where the Republicans got their shit together nationally on voter integrity laws. A lot of states stopped mail in voting after Covid, because Covid was the justification they needed in the first place. Then the Republicans started working on banning it as much as possible, or shifting it to absentee voting which is a safer process, which has to be requested ahead of time in person, has a signature confirmation, address confirmation, and ID.

That's basically the majority of that gap, even more than printed votes. It's probably something like 10 million mail-in votes weren't cast. We'll know if someone does a proper breakdown, but that seems to be it.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, fair enough. CDPR is funded by Poland. I was primarily talking about America.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it a purity spiral if the Islamists are only working with the Left so that they can kill them second?

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +4 / -1

Really desperate to undo this victory, aren't ya?

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hope he does that first, but I think he might need to first push in judicial appointees, remove executive orders, and fire government employees before even getting to those, just so he has a path that will allow them to go free without follow-up charges.

-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +4 / -5

Linda wasn't a performer but she was in the business.

Also she was a staple of the previous Trump administration. She never lost her cabinet position. I don't know that she did anything important, but she seems like a loyalist appointee.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +7 / -0

I knew he'd get over 300!

Lez goooooo

14
Gizortnik 14 points ago +14 / -0

These people are shockingly ignorant about everything

These are the people who think 14,000 unarmed black people are killed every year by the police. They think Kyle Rittenhouse shot 4 black people and fired over 100 rounds. They think 30% of the country is gay. And best of all, they think the economy is booming.

I'm not kidding. This is not Scott Adams' "One screen, two movies". We're watching a movie, and these motherfuckers are outside, in a ditch, tripping on mushrooms, and shitting themselves.

They live in a Leftist media hyper-reality. This is why we can barely even talk to them.

-6
Gizortnik -6 points ago +2 / -8

Unity through victory.

The default Left will come along once we win because what they respect, more than anything, is power. Meanwhile, the 'right' respects specific values and practicality. Just keep strong moral integrity and regular positive outcomes, and just don't compromise with terrorists.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like Musk is slowly becoming the poor man's, autistic, Vanderbilt.

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

I answered this before, so I'll paste my answer again because I think it's straight forward.

The tariffs are not going to cause a recession, but you'd better bet your ass that international finance will cause a recession to damage Trump. As for the criticisms you are hearing, they are the Austrian and Chicago School economic criticism of tariffs, so I know what they are doing. You are looking at Syndicalists and Socialists engaging in "Momentary Anarcho-Capitalism."

As a Libertarian and Austrian School guy, tariffs hurt the economy and hurt the tariff enactor more than the person whom you enact tariffs against

... assuming a free market otherwise exists on both sides

If you listen to what Trump's actually complaining about, he's basically saying he will use tariffs as a diplomatic weapon to remove the tariffs that have already been intentionally placed on us. Which would actually be a good thing if he can pull it off. That's not in the framing of this question.

Secondly, he's saying that he'd like to basically move back to a Gilded Age economic and tax system (which means massive de-regulation and de-taxation, replaced with tariffs for income). This would be a huge boon to the economy, as we currently exist in a Keynesian Socialist monetary system which is why the government is such a large share of the GDP. Trump's obsession with President McKinley suggests he wants that to be closer to 1% of the economy. The tariffs won't hurt us if we have a massive free market economy to balance against any problem they create, when our opponents will have massive command economy that won't be able to take advantage of our market.

Third, he is using to push back colonization. A foreign company operating in your borders is not a problem to most of the Chicago School because it comes with implicit assumptions like, "they will hire locals", and "they will be an independent entrepreneur". But these assumptions are false when dealing with Communists and Socialists. What we have seen so far, especially from China's Belt & Road Initiative in Africa is that all Chinese companies are in service to the Chinese Communist Party (no different from any other Socialists ever). The purpose of the corporation is not to make money, but to extend the power of the CCP. They will operate at a loss so long as the CCP can weaponize the lives of 1 billion people to extract all available wealth from and subsidize the corporation and it's operations in foreign territories. They can always out-compete to the detriment of their own economy so that they gain political power. They will hire predominantly chinese foreigners, settle them in the country, then use that colonial population as a political power base in the local government. If they do it a few more times, then they will do it in the state/provincial government. Unfortunately, China aren't the only ones doing this. You'll notice that the government is settling mass migrants in blocs of ethnic group. It's not random distributions, it's 20,000 Haitians in Springfield, OH; not a random aggregate. Having giant blocs of well placed colonies in the US not only guarantees extracted income from welfare that gets turned into remittances, but also political blocs of power within the US. Despite being a failed state, Somalia has a colony in Minnesota and a congresswoman who explicitly stated that her president is the president of Somalia. The point of some of these tariffs will be to stop colonization in the US which are using both American and foreign companies to create political revolution. Again, these are not hypotheses, it's already happened.

I'll put it like this: Thomas Sowell is a Chicago School economist who bitterly complained about Trump proposing tariffs before he was elected in 2016, and explicitly changed his mind on Trump because of how he actually did use tariffs. He changed his mind because he saw what Trump was actually doing. He wasn't having tariffs for the sake of having them because 'foreign product bad'. He was countering monetary aggression and building a gilded age economy. It might not be the perfect Chicago School style that he wanted, or the Austrian School style that I want, but it's a hell of a lot better than the SOCIALIST economy we currently have.

12
Gizortnik 12 points ago +12 / -0

We are not in the cultural institutions, we are just rebuking the institutions politically. Gaming isn't funded by the government, and isn't well connected, so the problem in gaming is a genuine infiltration by Leftists.

These "bitter, angry people" are Communist terrorists. They are Eric Harris and Dylan Kleebold being the Principle and Vice Principle of Columbine High. You are still not going to be able to get them to leave. You have to bulldoze the institution with them inside, and they won't give you another option. Just don't be afraid to do it.

The rest of us who don't have institutional power have to keep building and gatekeeping anti-parallel institutions. When the economy finally falters, gaming will go with it, and our anti-parallel institutions will be the ones where all growth will come from.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›