2
GiveThemNothing 2 points ago +2 / -0

In another article the convicted registered sex offender complains about "not being invited to my daughter’s friends’ birthday parties."

🤡🤡🤡🤡

20
GiveThemNothing 20 points ago +20 / -0

The 1st Amendment stands as a major roadblock...

Democracies have not proved they can move fast enough or big enough...

Not even pretending anymore.

The plan is clear: effectively repeal the 1st, replace democracy with an authoritarian system that "moves fast enough and big enough".

3
GiveThemNothing 3 points ago +3 / -0

OMG! I could hear the whiteness in that reporter's voice trying to suppress indigenous voices.

Literally shaking at the European colonialist vibes!

5
GiveThemNothing 5 points ago +5 / -0

We will be importing military age males from countries that hate us (for good reason!).

What can possibly go wrong???

But we must serve Zionists and finance their genocide and wars of aggression, and put boots on the ground to defend them.

3
GiveThemNothing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Smash JT: Alyssa sucks dicks for money.

Attorney: it is facially obvious that you made these statements knowing that...

Brilliant if the lawyers themselves made this error, even more brilliant if Smash is just fucking with them by misquoting them.

14
GiveThemNothing 14 points ago +14 / -0

There's fucking nobody visiting their booth, LOL!!!

11
GiveThemNothing 11 points ago +11 / -0

These people use "codes of conducts" they engineer to destroy communities, overthrow old guards and block contributors that are not aligned with their marxist ideology.

The author of the "Contributor Covenant" code of conduct used by Linux, Go, Ruby on rails.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:600/1*3HvH3e107Z3dqmnLZbmgzw.jpeg

2
GiveThemNothing 2 points ago +3 / -1

Only a retard would willingly join a foreign conscript army.

Or any army. Do not bleed for the billionaire class. If they want war, they can send their own sons to die for it.

Do NOT serve.

34
GiveThemNothing 34 points ago +34 / -0

Scientific American isn't Scientific American. It's a skinsuit being worn by a cabal of overpromoted head girls and their housebroken soyboys

This dude is a savage!

-1
GiveThemNothing -1 points ago +8 / -9

Zionists are the scum of the Earth, but in this case, targeting a militant group is totally justified.

There will be civilian casualties as collateral damage, but they are not the main target of this operation.

16
GiveThemNothing 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's probably some type of multimodal distribution with more than one confounding cause.

All the improperly tested vaccines, all the shit in processed food; metals, hormones and other contaminants in the water; airborne particulates and pesticides, all fucking kids up since before birth, from gestation.

1
GiveThemNothing 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other societies in the region had similar practices and beliefs

No, this shows how ignorant you are about Mesoamerica. Itza, Pipilt, Toltecah and other tribes that were routinely targeted by the Mexihcah, followed completely different deities, and did not routinely engage in human sacrifices.

Their deities required sacrifices of small reptiles, butterflies or flowers and forbade sacrifices for other deities in this case Huitzilopochtli, Mexicah god of war, in other cases Tlaloc.

To them, there would be no honor in dying for a foreign god.

Whole wars were fought over this, from the falls of Toltec Tolans to the rise of the Mexicah empire.

Yes one event, the four-day festival where sacrifices were held at several sites. Not one site.

Again, no. All references I find are to all sacrifices taking place on the four altars of the Great Temple (one altar facing each cardinal point: Red, White, Black, Blue). This according to codices from colonial times.

There is no evidence that this is true at all.

I pointed that out. There is no archaeological evidence that 80k bodies were disposed at these sites.

You are simply ignorant and self righteous in your stupidity.

1
GiveThemNothing 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Sacrifice was practised across the Valley of Mexico, and Aztec warriors accepted that they might receive the ‘flowered death by the obsidian knife’ as their own likely, even desirable, destiny"

Those sacrificed here were war prisoners taken from other tribes. They were not Mexicah (Aztecs). They followed completely different deities and religion. There would be no reason for them to find any honor in being sacrificed to a foreign god.

Who even said it was all at one site except you?

The 80k number refers exclusively to one event specifically, the re-consecration of The Great Temple at Tenochtitlan.

It is in the post itself. You argue like you read, at elementary level.

Also, you never addressed the lack of archaeological evidence to back the 80k sacrifices over 4 days claim. There simply is none.

It is simply logistically implausible to capture, mobilize, slaughter and dispose of such a large number of people, let alone leave no mass graves or at least a sizable ash layer (if cremated).

If you argue this poorly against someone who agrees with you, you will be handed your ass when you find real opposition.

Done and done.

3
GiveThemNothing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those captured wanted to be sacrificed...

There is no evidence that this is true at all. The Mexicah were universally hated by other mesoamerican tribes, and it is unlikely that these men would have been happy about being sacrificed to a deity from a completely different religion.

there were 16 - especially since 5k x 16 is 80k.

Yes, there was certainly more than one site, much more likely more than 16. The 80k number however is clearly for one temple at one location, during its consecration.

Tenochtitlan is now at part of a massively populated region, Mexico City, and has been excavated and closely studied, and still no remains have been found to support this number.

Exaggeration just makes it easy to dismiss the key point: Aztecs routinely made human sacrifices in large numbers, and were not the innocent little lambs portrayed by new age liberal retards.

Also, done with this.

4
GiveThemNothing 4 points ago +4 / -0

The total population of Tenochtitlan at the time was about 200k. That would mean a male military age (12-35) population of about 20k (10%) at best. That is just not enough to handle 80k prisoners, all of them military age men (the group typically captured through war for human sacrifice) without being overrun.

I point this out because it is an obvious exaggeration that is easy for "noble savage" advocates to dismiss and ridicule.

The reality is that the numbers were close to 4k-5k individuals, which is a fucking large number of people to murder over four days, by any standard.

Add to that that human sacrifice was an ONGOING activity and you get into the tens of thousands of people murdered for any one given year.

10
GiveThemNothing 10 points ago +10 / -0

Spain could have solved their population issues by bringing in immigrants that speak their same language, have a similar culture, follow the same religion and are ethnically related to Spaniards.

But that is not the true objective. The true objective is to fragment and ultimately destroy the national identity and cohesion, to ensure easier enslavement and a lower standard of living.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›