2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly who is being affected, both negatively and positively

My feeling/experience is that "black americans" are unlikely to be benefiting from these policies in the first place.

Most of the people I've seen benefit are either white women or people who's parents are from other countries - completely uninvolved in the so called "history of discrimination in the us".

6
GhostBond 6 points ago +6 / -0

How can they be this tone deaf? It's like they live in a different world.

Every element of their campaign is literally gaslighting to the opposite of reality.

Men are Women
Women are Men
Liberals freed the slaves (it was the republicans)
Genital Mutilation is "medically necessary"

It all revolves around a system where you can't believe what you see, you need to believe what you're told - which is 180 from reality.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

The left plays this theater where they promote things to disuguting to talk about in public or at dinner.

When people figure out what they're doing and they start talking about it - they silence the opposition saying it's to disturbing to be talking about and they can't believe someone would be saying these disturbing things.

The "trans" narrative is this exact process. Once you start talking the real affects of what they're actually doing - mutilating genitals and sewing on non-working fascimiles of the other gender - they go "how disgusting! surely people shouldn't be exposed to this!".

Then they go back to promoting the thing that's to disturbing to openly talking, under cutesy euphemisms.

3
GhostBond 3 points ago +3 / -0

It failed, so he was painted as a conservative. Anything that paints them that way is not the motivation it's just the smear.

Lot of companies contribute to both democrats and republicans because they want whoever wins the election to be favorable to them - so they just contribute to both.

0
GhostBond 0 points ago +1 / -1

The bill forces social media companies to pay news publishers for links to their content being available on the platform.

If the bill is about this I think canada might be kinda right in this one.

Our news propaganda network happened partly because they suddenly lost income to free internet news.

23
GhostBond 23 points ago +23 / -0

These medical-politicians are worse than regular politicians, jesus. The more they fail and make bad decisions the more they double down.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a hilarious Survivor thing where they have a mens-only group and a womens-only group and guess how it goes...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_HApmGofeA

Longer video on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzCO0G8AGLU

2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

But what the Dutch are proposing sounds like race based Price controls.

Just pointing out, we're so used to "marginalized" meaning racism in the US it's understandable but I can't find anywhere that it says race rather than income -

This concerns owner-occupied homes up to 355,000 euros, the AD writes . These may no longer be sold to just anyone. Instead, the municipality can force a house below this price to go to a buyer with a middle or low income.

11
GhostBond 11 points ago +12 / -1

People are trying to say that the Nazi's didn't like Magnus Hirshfeld and burned his clinic and records. This seems to be true.

But you see the US go the same way as the Weimar Republic - widespread moral degeneracy was a big thing for germans. Economic Degeneracy as well.

When is one is both broke and surrounded by people touting immoral things as "moral", a leader with a clear message and promises to clean things up is far more appealling then during good times.

8
GhostBond 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wait, so as a kid I could leave my parents at 12 and get my own room and independence? Sounds pretty cool.

(cough) I'm sure there will be no abuse in the new placement.

9
GhostBond 9 points ago +10 / -1

1. Not happening
2. Only a few edge case or bad actors
3. Biden administration says it is happening and it's a good thing

What are we down to, a week between step 2 and step 3?

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

My recollection is it's a cringe episode, but I suspect the objection is that it portrays how absurd it gets when someone simply insists you insert (skin color) people with no regard of whether the characters are written well or if the actors are interesting.

2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's an interesting experiment.
See how it goes.
Only way you know if it works is trying it.

You can't really logic what school shooters will do as they're nuts to begin with.

by folx
2
GhostBond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big increase in profits from setting up child surgical mutilation clinics.

by folx
1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's also a picture. Sometimes there's photoshopping going on.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is bogus be as it should be way higher than that.

I've never had to win a woman, but I've had a few times where I felt a girl "read" me to see if she could get away with hitting me first - when she decided I would hit her back she changed her mind about whether it would be fun or whatever.

5
GhostBond 5 points ago +5 / -0

I honestly hope their plan is to replace all the mods. All the political-associated - particularly one that are supposedly shitholes - are nightmare places.

1
GhostBond 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dunno, I'm a bit suspicious this is a psy-op from the left.

I mean this is how it always goes right? They send the women in to infiltrate from the inside. Then the organization starts blowing up from the inside and what appears to be it's own actions.

You ask yourself when the org started blowing up and it's when they put women "in positions of power".

Women are often found to be useful for spying, etc.

For example, Eric Swalwell, who serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,[23] was in the past targeted by a Chinese woman believed to be a clandestine officer of China's Ministry of State Security.[24][25] The alleged Chinese spy later participated in fundraising for Swalwell's 2014 congressional election bid and helped place an intern inside Swalwell's congressional office.[26] FBI gave Swalwell a "defensive briefing" in 2015, informing him that woman was a suspected Chinese agent.[27]

Coming in and bluntly breaking an organization apart directly? Men.

Convicing an organization to slowly alienate itself from it's audience by engaging behavior they'll hate? Women.

4
GhostBond 4 points ago +4 / -0

In most of Canada — as documented previously — it is now official policy to keep parents in the dark if children come out as trans to teachers. These guidelines have been brought in by stealth and without discussion with parents

Again, this evil shit where you're magical and special if you sacrifice your genitals in the name of their god.

Keeps reminding me of the Mayans requirung yearly human sacrifices.

5
GhostBond 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Displays of intolerance and homophobia are unnacceptable
"This kind of rhetoric starts at home

Always accussing everyone else, of what they're doing themselves.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›