I hate to play devil's advocate on something like this, but it's possible these accounts are genuinely bot accounts that upvote posts without posting isn't it?

I know some of these big companies did actually slowly get drug into banning a fair amount of the feminist hate speech eventually...

He explained that he felt it is better for one to resign from a job that doesn't make one happy, rather than stay and let the job damage one's mental health.

I have done this, but it's a lot easier to do when you have a prince's bank account to fall back on, you know?

I don't want to diss him or anything as I think the rich and influental discussing the subject is a net positive but a lot of the people who don't pretty much can't.

They're literally evil people looking to kill you.

Reduce the population of men to 10%.

They steal your jobs so you can't work, brainwash your kids, destroy your relationships with propaganda, then sit back and wait for you to die. It's morally like the nazis but they implememt it like the russians did in starving large parts of western ukraine to death.

"But something something good intentions"

If they gave 2 shits about gender distribution and whatnot, they'd be making the same requirements that men make up 50% of managers and employees in teaching, in nursing, in hr.

Of course you won't see that happen, because it's not about any inequality at all.

There is ZERO reason to ever point a gun at someone's chest and pull the trigger unless you want that person dead.

You seem to be being very loud that you don't know how movies work.

it's possible they mocked everything up

Trivially easy to fake screenshots.

Here's a fake screenshot where you admitted you did all the forgery yourself.
https://i.imgur.com/2VYCIhJ.png

a vigilante group. Meanwhile a representative from People v. Preds tells Kotaku that the reason this information was released publicly, rather than handed directly to authorities, was that “The police department doesn’t work with ‘Cyber groups’ like us. That’s when the internet takes over.”

Dunno, this sounds like the usual feminist tactics.

• "senior vice president" - a high title, high salary job a woman wants where you talk all day and have no objective criteria for it you're doing your job or not.
• He's unattractive in the way women judge men, which means they see him as easy to attack an undeserving of being treated as human.
• Software industry.
• Story is unverifiable (screenshots don't even require much skill to fake and since it's not the police we know there's zero chance 3rd party sight verified anything).
• Story has some "subvert expectations" element to mix things up for entertaining whoever drives these things.

I'm imaging some meeting with the women at the company.
"So we're all set to accuse him of sexual harrassment, but there's a snap"
"What's that?"
"Well I did what we said and wore my super low cut shirt to meetings so everyone would see him gawking before I stay late then accuse him of grabbing my boobs...but didn't even look."
"Girl, you have the best boobs I've ever seen. I wish I had them. No man could avoid staring at those - unless he's gay."
"Yeah, that must be it, he must be gay."
"Well what can we do?"
"Well he must be gay if he wasn't interested in you, how can we use this against him..."

Maybe they fake the whole thing.
Maybe they pay someone in a vigilante group to fake it.
Etc etc...

Whatever it is, I bet a woman will be rewarded with a new senior vice president position.

P.S. Seriously, do you have any idea how easy it is for even unskilled people to fake screenshots? Breaking into a site requires big agencies and/or skill, but faking a screenshot? It's like leaving fake male in someone's unlocked mailbox at the end of their driveway.

This is interesting, but it's not some sort of covid thing:

A team of 15 hired assassins murdered two rival drug dealers on a beach next to the Hyatt Ziva Riviera Cancún in Puerto Morelos on November 4. The broad daylight assault forced tourists and workers to seek refuge in the hotel before the armed gang escaped on speedboats.

They're trying to protect their tourist industry.

This comic is backwards.

They aren't against this system, this system is their deliberate end goal.
Women who leave the workforce to raise kids are seen to them as "losing money".
Women who marry a man and don't work are seen to them simplistically as "losing money".

Women who have to work is exactly, explicitly what they're going for.
If they sell their bodies that's fine as long as it doesn't result in children or a permanent attachment that lets her leave working.

Seems like it's always self-projection.

The exact problem dems are crashing right into right now is they've reached the point where their big lies stop working:

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

That's pretty good, the tactic does seem to be simply pointing at reality using hysterical tones doesn't it?

Man seem tsking to work, just days after subway murder!

I know the obvious problem with #StopAsianHate was the people attackingvthem were black guys, but I still say it stopped because someone realized being targetted as a political punching bag was the worst thing that could happen to asians.

Every group left rhetoric targets somehow never improves or gets pulled down despite people believing they're "helping".

All the polls I've seen show huge majorities in favor of extremely restrictive coronavirus policies.

Are these the same pollsters that said hillary would win the election or (any number of other tbings they're off on)?

There seems to be a very strong correlarion between the biden admin moving away from it's original middle ground perspective, into things the radical wing enjoys, and an immediate drop in it's popularity.

I kinda feel like they're going to appeal ot just to give the political parties something to fight about that doesn't dive into the hate group crap they left has gotten into.

Like they need something to politic on, and obviously run out they've turned things into a shit show.

You could argue that perhaps he just goes with whatever is actually popular, vs current "go with whatever the screamiest radicals in my party want" thing the party is doing.

days after journalists, left-wing activists and self-described "sedition hunters" reported their accounts had been locked for sharing publicly available images of anti-maskers, anti-vaccine protesters and suspected Capitol insurrectionists.

Honestly, if twitter is actually applying these evenly I'm good with it.

I'd be happy for the shitshow to be over.

All that study shows me is that women think their jobs are supposed to be easier and don't want to admit that men have always had to work harder than they realized and are just used to it.

I thought this is actually basically what the other poster is saying.

It's literally a "steal your jobs" program. Management is where men go when they're older and they're working t f-you out of that.

Ask them what their plans are to make the HR departmemt 50% male.

(crickets) (angry looks about how you're trying to steal their jobs).

Or, if you're TheImp, is still progressing and will be completed by 2030 when women kill most the men and bar the rest from any job other than garbage collector.

If you've been through this at work, it's definitely the fanatics attitude. He's not understating it.

Best time I had was when those women were in a different department. Far enough away to not have to avoid the shared grind of work, close enough to get together to chat/lunch/etc casually.

White men's greatest enemy is white women.

True, unfortunately.

While I don't disagree, Thomas Sowell had a theory that liberal policies actually caused black people to be stuck in poverty.

Started to wonder in the last few years if this might actually be true.

Problem is they could start it up but not turn it off when they wanted?

White men saying "white men are inherently bad" really mean "I am inherently bad personally".

If, say, gold was discovered in Honduras and the nation became rich and immigrants started flocking to Honduras because an uneducated person could feed his family there, then the lack of white people having kids would be something the media would be SCREAMING about.

I've been trying to come up with a similar analogy.

I wouldn't even say they'd be screaming about it - I bet if people having kids suddenly became immensely profitable, they'd flip a switch on what we see in the media and within a couple of months women would suddenly be horny and aggressively seeking out men to have kids with.

There's something in humans that cause/diminishes desire for sex based on messages from the social group. Probably tribes of people survived who didn't have kids when famine was coming and did have kids when prosperity was on the horizon.

If it was beneficial for themselves for people to have kids I'd bet they know exactly how to change the messaging to accomplish that.

Yeah, at best those subs are amateur stuff.

The US Military was running "Operation Earnest Voice" 10 years ago which used "persona management software" to post on social media. Imagine how much progress every group with an agenda has made in doing it since then.

I don't know that it's as much "advanced ai" - it's probably a scripted set of "questions" and responses, autoposted by bots doing relatively simple text matching.