Holy shit imp can you see more than one color for a second.
Zelensky is a CIA puppet, not a secret woman cabal puppet. The men being conscripted aren't slaves for "women's protection". Nobody in Ukraine is being protected except the corrupt and congress' money laundromat.
Fuck letting workers in at all right now. Our economy is fucked and fucking the labor pool worse will just mean serf wages for citizens. Labor is supply and demand like anything else, allowing corps to destroy the scale by importing workers is a shit idea.
If a corporation needs more skilled laborers it can pay better or contribute to education for that field. Used to be a company would offer to pay for training in return for a guaranteed x years contract.
You are fundamentally incapable of understanding cost-benefit analysis. Stop embarrassing yourself replying while missing the point.
You don't need to deliberately put reactors in unsuitable areas to make better designs. That's fucking idiotic.
You are legitimately dimwitted if you didn't catch the point, which is that you must assume these things will always fail. Which is why you put it somewhere that the inevitable failure will cause minimal damage. They don't belong everywhere and Japan is an unsuitable area for nuclear power.
My argument is in no way related to gun control. Guns don't kill tens of thousands and leave decades of fallout behind. Defensive gun uses mathematically outweigh criminal gun uses.
You're just illiterate. It's called a cost benefit analysis. The challenger explosion cost 7 lives. Space development is worth exponentially more than that. Dams have massively more utility than risk.
Nuclear reactor failures are EXPONENTIALLY more devastating than anything you just listed, comparing a mountain to a molehill.
If you were capable of following a conversation you'd see I said there are acceptable places for nuclear development. You especially wouldn't have tried the "u no into space" shit because I said nuclear energy should absolutely be used in space. Go read the end of my first post.
Were you an adult during the Fukushima incident? I doubt it given your brainlet take on the potential consequences of putting a nuclear reactor somewhere prone to natural disasters.
The full on gun bunny look all done up but in gear always looks comedic instead of the "badass" they're going for.
Wipe that shit off your face, cut your hair and put some actual plates in the carrier, or stop roleplaying. Just take some range day photos in jeans and you've got the same effect without looking like a poser.
Because retards and those who manipulate them always win in the end. There is no incorruptible society. Governments always fall. If anything it's so incredibly common that the intelligent analysis assumes government defaults to incompetent evil.
A nuclear reactor will eventually fail in the same way that rain will eventually fall. "Why not just not ever let bad things happen though?" This is you right now. Do you realize what website you're on?
If bill gates decided to build a nuclear plant in texas would you be ok with that? Even though he is hostile to human life and deliberately engineering a reactor failure would align with his stated goals.
As for your shitty analogy, it's more like being against the use of nukes in warfare. Or opposing insane governments getting nukes.
The people who built Fukushima reactor didn't predict funding and upgrades being prevented by acts of government stupidity. You're saying " if people just don't act retarded it will be fine". You have to account for people being retarded to the point of self destruction, because people will never stop being retarded.
A nuclear reactor is dangerous on a scale vastly eclipsing conventional fuel explosions. Don't be a retard.
So in a good and just world nuclear is mostly fine barring freak accidents. Except we don't live in that world and freak accidents also need to be accounted for. Not accounting for people being retarded is a design flaw.
Nuclear power should be reserved for geologically stable and desolate areas, and space.
You all really want 50 million more angry single mother raised, fetal alcohol / fetal drug abuse victims running around? Abortion is morally wrong, yes. It should be accompanied by a mandatory sterilization and a bar from working in a medical field or with children .
However it should also be free. It's cheaper both short and long term compared to welfare queens having 6 kids and raising none of them properly.
We've long since transitioned from an actually competitive capitalist system to a corporate oligarchy where idiotic concepts like corporate personhood allow corporations to grow beyond where they would naturally, because the people running them are no longer held accountable for misdeeds or failures.
No matter if 51% of people in Ukraine voted for it, forcing people to fight in a war that could have been avoided by not provoking the nuclear superpower on your border is illegitimate.