lol
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
So in a good and just world nuclear is mostly fine barring freak accidents. Except we don't live in that world and freak accidents also need to be accounted for. Not accounting for people being retarded is a design flaw.
Nuclear power should be reserved for geologically stable and desolate areas, and space.
That's true for pretty much ANYTHING, the amount of fuel storage that have blown up easily surpasses nuclear incidents, the fact that there's only been 3 notable ones is quite the achievement.
And as many have said the plant itself was very out dated but anti-nuclear activists kept blocking funds for modernisation, it's the equivalent of being against all conflict but blocking modernisation to smart accurate guided bombs so we keep having to use napalm and carpet bombing.
If bill gates decided to build a nuclear plant in texas would you be ok with that? Even though he is hostile to human life and deliberately engineering a reactor failure would align with his stated goals.
As for your shitty analogy, it's more like being against the use of nukes in warfare. Or opposing insane governments getting nukes.
The people who built Fukushima reactor didn't predict funding and upgrades being prevented by acts of government stupidity. You're saying " if people just don't act retarded it will be fine". You have to account for people being retarded to the point of self destruction, because people will never stop being retarded.
A nuclear reactor is dangerous on a scale vastly eclipsing conventional fuel explosions. Don't be a retard.
Well no, that first analogy doesn't work, you have proven malice in his intent, it's like letting a fox who's been stealing your chickens then guard said chickens.
And instead of kneecapping ourselves because we listen to the retarded, why not do what we used to do, don't listen to them and put them in arrow fodder positions
Because retards and those who manipulate them always win in the end. There is no incorruptible society. Governments always fall. If anything it's so incredibly common that the intelligent analysis assumes government defaults to incompetent evil.
A nuclear reactor will eventually fail in the same way that rain will eventually fall. "Why not just not ever let bad things happen though?" This is you right now. Do you realize what website you're on?
Are you German
Nein, just slightly more informed on logistics and safety than the "just nuclear everything" technophiles.
I'm gonna guess prob'ly not.
Given that I actually have a more nuanced understanding beyond "nuclear gud!!111!" You'd guess wrong.