Thirding catbox.moe. I'd definitely participate if you did this. And yes, a fairly niche theme is recommended, to make the entries more comparable, and limiting the amount a mere difference in taste from the judges plays. Make it clear what the judges are looking for.
I don't know If I'd limit it to specific characters, but you should engineer the theme in such a way as to push people out of their typical habits when generating, make it complex enough that mastery over the generation tools is required, but broad enough to give space for ambition and skill to shine through to differentiate between works that meet the theme.
Yeah, the key thing about this new round of AI's is that they are very good at predicting what a user wants to hear. This is immediately apparent in a multi-turn chat with an uncensored AI in which the AI will very quickly align it's ethical positions and politics with those of the user.
They are world class bullshitters. Despite what it appears, the sum total of human knowledge doesn't fit in one hundred gigabytes or so, it's just very good at filling in the gaps with things that it feels are plausible. Sometimes it's right, sometimes it's not.
Leftist feeds it examples and all the examples referencing Africans are labeled racist and all examples referencing women are labeled sexist, it isn't going to question anything, and will readily rate any references to Africans or Women with high scores.
A case of using a shiny new tool in every application regardless of how suitable it is, likely compounded by a poor training set .
Seems like it's an even split Atheist and Christian, but most of the Atheists here admit that religion is a necessary tool to control the segment of the population that immediately indulges in their most depraved desires when freed from societal obligations.
I think there's also a significant portion that are not commiting to anything just because of how cucked most segments of Christianity are these days. In short, even if it's probably not true, Christianity is a useful tool, but one badly in need of sharpening.
Probably late in the 2016 republican primary, when it started shaking out that it was going to be him and Ted Cruz fighting for the nomination to go against Hillary Clinton.
I liked him before, but it was around the time the "The Delegates, Dahnald" and Zodiac Killer memes were running full bore was the time I went from liking him compared to Hillary and Cruz to actively supporting him.
The fact that he had just taken down Jeb! and I was actively starting to hate Clinton, also probably played a role
Welcome to the new space race. No one can slow down, as hesitation could lead to a stark technological disadvantage that could loom over the country for decades.
Buckle up, there's really no telling how all this shakes out.
I'm just going to go on record saying that the rivalry between Heinz ketchup and French's ketchup for the Canadian market, has done wonders for the quality of Canadian ketchup, and is a net benefit for the Canadian consumer.
I don't know what tools exactly are available in discord, but I'd just make a rule against "showing your power level" aka handing out excessive and unsolicited personal information. If he persists, suspension. If it's a small server, and he complains that he's being unfairly targeted, have a friend intentionally run afoul of the rule and ban him for a day.
If he comes back, add more time for each suspension until you've impossible1ed him.
No kid gloves, enforce the rule vigorously, (and on everyone) or this will only get worse.
https://files.catbox.moe/hbq5fx.png
How's this?
It's true regardless of the subtext. Russia doesn't like NATO. There are many reasons for that.
Ukraine being allowed to join NATO is non-negotiable. Hence the war.
I don't think you disagree with me on this topic in any substantial way. Forgive me if you believe I've oversimplified anything just because I didn't write a five page essay with citations on a web forum.
Of course, but NATO seems to be Russia's big sticking point. If Ukraine gives up on that, suddenly they're back at the negotiating table hammering out the details of how this can be resolved, instead of blowing each other up.
No one will leave 100% happy, but that doesn't mean that tensions can't be lowered enough to end the conflict.
They reportedly believed that they could destroy Russia with sanctions.
.........
They reportedly believed that they could destroy [one of the largest countries on the planet, with huge amount of natural resources by not buying their shit.]
We did that once already. IIRC it took nearly 80 years. /s
Flip a coin, they're either lying or retarded. (Or more likely both.)
But they were all of that before joining NATO.
Remember, that's what all this is over. Russia was willing to bring the war to an end nearly three years ago if Ukraine would give up on joining NATO and it's claims on Crimea, and the part of the Donbas that Russia already controlled since 2014.
Everything seemed like it was wrapping up. Then the US, the UK, the EU, and a bunch of other places jumped in the middle and yelled "Stop! Stop! We'll give you infinite guns and money if you keep fighting!"
Why? What is so crucial about this dumpster fire that more and more fuel needs to be shoveled on it?
Can't escape Sturgeons law. 90% of everything is shit. No exceptions. At least this way we don't have to deal with the glorified prostitutes with the over inflated sense of self worth.