Spider-man of the 60s/70s/80s because he was an obviously good person struggling with the limitations imposed by his desire to be good and the tremendous power he'd been fated to have.
I also found Drizzt Do'Urden appealing because he too struggled to be good despite the many forces aligned against that desire. I hated what the character did to the tabletop though, however inevitable.
Perhaps to add to the theme, Frodo (and Sam) stand out to me as well because they toiled to end a great evil against all the odds.
I suppose the theme here is that I find unlikely heroes who ultimately must stand alone in their beliefs to be most captivating, and all three of these examples embody those tropes (even if Frodo somewhat subverts it).
Search for buccal fat removal.
Nerdrotic and crew carry that cross so we don't have to.
The answer is that the system owns them, of course.
I don't know this theory, but by the title alone I can tell it explains everything.
And we're completely serious.
That and many of these idiots don't even understand the concept or philosophy of journalism. They're either activists or think that being a propagandist is being a journalist.
I can't believe no one suspects background government actors, especially since Biden signed an "AI safety" EO just three weeks ago that represents an attempt to get control over AI.
"There's a reason they're called 'disorders,' libshits."
Two X, no dangling T.
They really want us all to have to pick a side.
That's so fucked.
While that's fine, I'm looking forward to WoW classic plus plus.
For sure, this is a worse release than even the total bomb Ghostbusters on several levels. Rock bottom!
Whatever you've heard, it's worse.
And Iron Man 1 was a make-or-break gamble at the time. Also for Downey, who was attempting to revive himself.
$46 million is how much the Paul Feig Ghostbuster flop took in for its first weekend, too.
You're not kidding, that was really over the top and unnecessary. I get that he's jaded, but damn.
He did reveal that his second "source" was a detective who verified the information the first source had was authentic.
As posted elsewhere here, Candace Owens has now come out and claims that two detectives are being fired over this. She has underhanded reasons to potentially ascribe her next claim -- that one of the officers took money for it -- but that's a possible thing too, with this release.
Honestly, if everything gets released and is authentic, I don't really give a fuck if someone had to pay the cop to get it. After all, it's been suppressed because of corruption and false motives, so it's all fair play as far as I'm concerned.
I didn't catch Jeremy's interaction on this. Is your impression that Crowder beat them to the punch on releasing it? That's pretty funny, if true.
I can't believe Crowder gave up that one of his sources was a detective involved.
View losing as part of the game and a step in the process of improving, not as a final state. If you can think and learn from what went wrong, instead of becoming emotional over the result, you'll actually improve yourself in several ways.
Equality is about treating people equally, not treating them as equals.