National Socialists were also socialists.
They just hated the Marxists.
Emergency authorization was only available because the medical community strenuously rejected any existing treatment.
There were doctors threatened with being struck off for trying to publish treatment protocols.
Eventually, there were clinics that were giving effective treatment, but they had to do it in secret or else they would be destroyed by the state government's regulatory agencies. All to set the stage that the Pfizer clot shot could be rolled out.
In Australia they passed an act of parliament granting Pfizer unlimited immunity to repercussions of the clot shot so the Australian medical system could get access to some of the first exports of the treatment.
It is a conspiracy with a shocking, staggering reach.
Having studied Pharmacy at university; the first year had a course on the reading and understanding biological studies.
It was made real clear that most studies are pushing an agenda by starting from the conclusion and working backwards, cherry-picking "facts" to support their conclusion.
I was working in a hospital at the time of Covid, in a non medical role. Policy was set from the top down by management and specific training and procedures were rolled out.
It was made very, very clear that if you toed the line that all medical incidents and similar bullshit would be ignored by the hospital (who have a lot of practice doing this) but if you kicked up a fuss they would do their best to have you fired.
Management used the opportunity to get rid of anyone who wasn't a follower, anyone who objected, or spoke up, or complained.
Covid 19 was an application of realpolitik and empire-building. It was a failure of the community.
It really isn't hard to regulate.
You just declare that castration / cosmetic mastectomies are a violation of the Hippocratic oath. Take the medical license of any doctors who perform them.
The procedures become uninsurable. Surgical theaters are now unavailable for the procedures, and a hospital that provides them is liable to lawsuits without insurance coverage. Problem solved.
People can still travel to Thailand or whatever to get themselves neutered. So what?
Nah mate. You butter your bread, then apply a small amount of Kraft (tm) Vegemite (tm) on to both pieces.
Add sliced tasty cheese (or cheddar if you can't find tasty); assemble the sandwich and microwave it for 30 seconds to soften the cheese.
Move the sandwich to a hot pan and brush the outside of the bread with melted butter or vegetable oil.
Squash the sandwich with the bottom of a small saucepan to flatten it and to allow the steam to further melt the cheese.
Flip. Repeat squashing. The sandwich is done when the cheese is gratinated (melted) and the outside of the bread is a golden brown.
Cut in half and serve.
Enjoy the salty, savory flavor of the Kraft (tm) Vegemite (tm) along with the sharp, savory flavor of the cheese.
Specifically, they were Jewish, Pro-Marxist Militia. They conducted terrorist activities in Berlin and Germany, including bombings.
A rough equivalent would be if the IRA were Jewish and in Germany instead.
In case anyone was wondering what the difference is:
Bushi: A professional warrior or soldier. Someone trained in the skills of battle, logistics and fighting as used by a soldier. A follow of bushido which is literally: The Way of the Warrior.
Samurai: A retainer of a daimyo. A person appointed to a privileged position of power in the service of a powerful, local lord. Usually appointed to oversee military matters, which could include logistics and supply, but more usually pertained to the disposition of fighting men and their duties. A samurai had roughly the equivalent of the duties of a commissioned officer in the western tradition.
To sum up: A bushi is a soldier or fighting man. A samurai is of the officer class and enjoyed considerable power and authority. Not the same.
Barron Trump for King.
I don't think you understand, bro! If you just get a really great job, a good car and then hit the gym to become a total Chad ... you can spend some time with a run-through slut that will dump you the first moment she sees something better or that the tingles fade.
Just be better than 80% of other men and you can enjoy a harem of mercenary sluts and, like, get sloppy 50ths. Just do better!
Single women are the single largest voting block.
Hey, don't forget state-funded no-kill shelters! Unlimited free cats!
Just reminding people that Epstein maintained a house in New York. It had masseuses / escorts in it, and they used to invite people around all the time.
Trump attended the house several times. There were interesting people there and he enjoyed hanging out a bit.
He always refused the catered food they had delivered. He was scrupulous about refusing the massages offered to him by the girls. We know this because there is on-the-record testimony by girls who were working there at the time.
Trump had a very good idea that the operation was a honey-pot and he took steps to protect himself. He did independent investigation into the bullshit that was going down.
Trump, later, cleared his schedule and gave unlimited time to the prosecutor bringing the Epstein bullshit to trial in New York. He was very frank, and had many, many details of who was doing what and when.
If Trump had not gone to extraordinary efforts to avoid blackmail, he would absolutely be appearing on some kind of list, smeared with the same brush.
It isn't just quitting, they are ending their career.
People who went to Epstien Island are not necessarily depraved criminals. The island was contrived (By the CIA and Mossad) to generate plausible blackmail material. Even someone who just flew there and had a few cocktails and a chaste, boring massage is compromised.
I am not saying that none of the people who went there are depraved criminals, just ... not all of them, and we will never be able to sort out who is who.
The biggest blow will be to the Israeli and Democrat interests who have been deprived of their blackmail material and the leverage that it provides.
Except when ... a local activist group starts stringing up all of the rapists, murderers and drug dealers, certain trends will emerge.
"You fuckers are just racist!"
Tony,
is this you inching towards conceding a point? That, in general, women don't find men, as a group, worthy of respect? I'm shocked. Truly, genuinely shocked. I could have sworn that no amount of evidence nor negative experience could disabuse you of your rampant feminine worship.
We live in the most gynocentric society in history by more than a standard deviation. Never has society spent so much effort and resources to give women exactly what they say they want. Never has the base, essential nature of women been so clearly revealed. In general, the women of today are doing exactly what they want. They have never had so much power over men as they do today in the western world. The way women, in general, treat men is exactly how they want. The marriage rate has never been lower. Divorce has never been higher. Both of these are behaviors mediated by women.
Children have never had less access to their fathers. Women are the majority of university graduates, and in major cities, women under 30 make more money than men of the same demographic. Western women have never in history been so incredibly, insatiably promiscuous. Worldwide, abortion is now the #1 cause of death as a direct result. Yet despite all of this disposable, junk-food sex, the birthrate has bottomed out as a direct consequence of giving women exactly what they want. It turns out what women want, in general, is to fuck and party and to not have any responsibility to other people through marriage or family; which by the way, is exactly congruent with the core principles of feminism.
Your usual response seems to be to say "Not all women!" and "lol. Do better men." And to ban the Imp.
Despite your protestations, broad trends can be noticed. Women (as a group) absolutely need to be held accountable. Part of that is that women (as a group) see men as disposable as facial tissues and (in general) not worthy of respect; with a few exceptions made for chads.
It isn't rocket science to figure out where these trends lead. They lead fairly directly to the implosion of major cultures and the end of nations. Three or four generations after the "sexual revolution" and the invention of the hormonal birth control pill, giving women exactly what they want ends civilization. But "Not all women" amirite?
Want to know the successful recipe for finding a woman who values marriage and engages in a mutual, beneficial partnership forever?
It requires carefully selecting a partner to minimize western, cultural influences.
There are tells and traits that separate high quality wives from low quality women. These are not preferences, they are indicators that predict the future of a relationship. Some are more accurate than others, but together they can give a fairly sound picture.
Want to minimize your chance of divorce? It turns out that your wife should be a virgin with a strong religious and family background. That she should dress modestly and have a good relationship with both her mother and her father. Her parents should not be divorced. She should not have tattoos or piercings.
Hopefully she should have studied the bible and seriously considered the lessons that it teaches about both men and women and especially marriage. She should want children and be trained in all of the skills to run a household. The foremost of these is that she should be skilled in financial planning and the prudent use of money. Many divorces cite financial difficulty (fights about money) as a point of friction. It turns out both partners being able to cook and manage money helps avoid that.
It may be possible to find such a woman in a Western country. I suspect that you'll have to go to a small, rural town. In most cases her attending a major university is a negative factor, because the modern academy is equal parts slut factory and indoctrination center. It takes a very exceptional woman to make it through university without being corrupted by the steady marination in promiscuous sexual influences and the steady diet of neo-Marxist bullshit.
"lol, just go find a unicorn!" Does this give some context to your advice?
If my parents had taken any effort at all to teach me how to spot a good wife, then I would have been saved vast amounts of suffering. Instead, they went out of their way to do the exact opposite. "Women are good people"; "Why would a women ever lie about that?"; "Just follow your feelings"; "Your heart will tell you when you've met the right person."
The truth is that very few western women are worthy of our respect and vastly less are wife material. Women are mostly self-indulgent children who think with their feelings and have utterly destroyed their ability to pair-bond through promiscuity. Being a woman should not be an excuse for being a shitty person and a rotten, self center parent; yet it is. Society will not tolerate women, in general or specific, being held accountable. Instead their bad behavior is both celebrated and funded by the taxpayer.
At the same time Mens' groups (incels, gamers, MRAs) are added to literal terrorist watchlists and investigated by Three Letter Agencies; while people like you minimize the broader issues and say things like "not all women!"
Okay. I agree. Not all women.
Cool story bro.
Want to correct your ignorance? Or are you happy with those blue pills?
How about you start with: The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men by Christina Hoff Sommers.
I don't agree with Dr. Hoff Sommers on everything, but she is right that the education system is a) Run by women from top to bottom and b) Systematically discriminates against boys. Is that how women show respect? Or not?
From there you can go and look into how the bottom 80% of males are just, flat out invisible to women in the dating market. It is well supported by scientific study, and it is leading directly to population implosion in a bunch of nations. It is supported by the human genetic record that shows that only 40% of men (on average) have ever gotten to pass on their genes. 60% just don't ever get a opportunity for fatherhood. That didn't change until relatively recently in human history, and enforced monogamy is (IMNHO) a required precursor to human civilization arising from stone tools and mud huts.
After that you can look at how feminism is the dominant political paradigm. Political parties that don't at least pay lip-service to feminist ideology don't get elected. It is why the Democrats have been so successful, politically, for so long. Abortion is an issue for women. Men, in general, don't care very much. Freedom from the consequences of biology is very much fitting with the political movement of Feminism.
As you are aware, the central thesis of feminism is that men have the power to construct society as they choose; and that they have chose to construct a society with the primary purpose of oppressing women. This is the foundation of feminist scholarship, and we have seen a dramatic feminizing of universities, with more women professors than ever and the female graduates in history. All having been fed this propaganda of oppression and victimhood, painting men as unrepentant oppressors.
The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.
Do men, as a class receive respect for establishing absolute tyranny over women? Do women think they should?
Having worked extensively in female dominated professions, I find, in general, the respect the average woman holds for a blue collar man (which are most of them by numbers) to be shockingly low. In my experience, the respect is lower still from women who were raised by a single mother.
Finally, I'd point out the number of women who are willing to endure a fair and equitable settlement, especially with regard to children, at the end of a marriage; basically none. If women are stuffed so full of respect and admiration for men, why do they treat the fathers of their children so badly, so often?
But I imagine having frothy coffee with fag-hags when you find time between sucking dicks gives you a different perspective.
Get a passport, bro.
Were the Socialists good to the Jews?
We can't and won't stop fifteen year old girls from fucking, yet we won't make them get married to a good husband so they can live their best life, long term.
Victory? I guess?
Tony, you massive faggot, why can't women worship us?
Men build everything. They invent and run everything that is important or worthwhile. A man, in a relationship, earns most of the money, most of the time by being productive and doing the dirtiest and most dangerous jobs.
Yet we can't even get fucking respect, let alone wide-eyed worship. Why not?
Not that you care. You are too busy sucking dicks to understand the crushing disdain that most western women have for almost all men.
Whenever a woman isn't getting enough attention, she just takes more clothes off.
Eventually, no one cares.
But advertising the Aloha Snack Bar isn't?
Deus Vault!
Agnostics believe that proof is impossible within this world.
While they are correct, it misses the point. It doesn't matter if there is a God. It does matter if we carry our burdens and strive to make the world better using guiding principles. Both require faith.
Nations founded on Protestant principles are more peaceful and more prosperous. You can compare that to godless faiths like Marxism and Feminism. Both which destroy civilization.
So National Socialism was a monopsony. A command economy where the government ordered and paid for production.
The government was, effectively, the only buyer for goods. National Socialism is superior to Marxism, because the market can determine value for goods under Fascism.
Under Marxism the government commands what to produce and what price to sell the products for; which does not allow cost, demand or utility to play a direct factor in setting the price.
This is why the CCP has switched over to a similar system and hasn't gone broke yet, rather than the USSR which went out of business.
None the less, both are authoritarian, command economies where the people (as represented by the Party) effectively own and run everything. You know, socialism.
Razorfist did a pretty good video on it.
https://youtu.be/9-SLqdhkvJo?si=yktF1WPkVEpG9mKR